• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

APT vs Pendolino Tilt Mechanisms / Sickness

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
21 May 2014
Messages
972
Having watched a program about the APT recently, I've been trying to work something out that's been bugging me. It's clear the APT made people nauseous (actually physically sick?) and the Pendo doesn't generally have this effect. What's the key difference between the mechanisms that means that the Pendolino's tilt doesn't make people ill?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JohnMcL7

Member
Joined
18 Apr 2018
Messages
1,049
The problem was fixed on the APT as well, the sickness was caused by the carriage tilting perfectly which meant when the train was tilted people could see visually they were at an angle but they couldn't feel it at all. The solution was for the train not quite to tilt perfectly so people could feel some sensation of going round the corner to match what they were seeing.

The APT-P was sadly before my time but it seemed to have suffered badly from a lot of negative publicity including the belief it made people ill, latterly it apparently went into regular service with few issues which given the complexity of the train is very impressive. I felt they were a bit harsh on the APT-P on the recent channel 5 documentary making it out to be completely worthless while the HST had been so much better.
 
Last edited:
Joined
21 May 2014
Messages
972
Interesting... what do you mean by "tilting perfectly" though? Too smooth? Did they therefore make the motion a bit more rough? Something like that?
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
The "perfect tilt" meant that the tilt entirely compensated for the forces experienced by going around the corners, so you couldn't feel that the train was tilting or going around the corners which made people queasy when they could see it. To fix it, they made it tilt less and therefore not 100% compensate for the forces experienced.
 

JohnMcL7

Member
Joined
18 Apr 2018
Messages
1,049
Interesting... what do you mean by "tilting perfectly" though? Too smooth? Did they therefore make the motion a bit more rough? Something like that?

If the carriage tilted the correct amount for the radius of the curve, passengers in the carriage would feel the same as if the carriage was flat and it would mean a drink on a table would be level. The problem was when the carriage was fully tilted passengers could see that was the case and would be seeing the sky out one window and the ground out the other however they would feel like they were still level. It's the opposite to car sickness where you're focused on a book which is static but your body can feel it's moving.

The solution was for the carriage to tilt slightly less than was required so people could get a feel of being tilted and even though it was only a very small effect, much less than the carriage was actually tilted it was enough to match what people were seeing and didn't feel ill.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,797
There's probably another, more simple explanation: Hyperbole.
And another one: alcohol taken on by the press before/on the press trip. Private Eye's "Lunchtime O'Booze" was probably there...
 

daikilo

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Messages
1,623
There's probably another, more simple explanation: Hyperbole.

By tilting "perfectly", what the passenger feels is a downward pressure a bit like an aircraft taking off. With the Pendo there is mostly downward pressure but also some lateral which the human brain (ear?) seems to cope better with.

Today, I guess the average new passenger doesn't know that the Pendos actually tilt. I think some don't even realise that the track does on most higher speed curves as well!
 

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
APT-P was a fantastic bit of kit!

What annoys me about how it's presented in the media is a failure when in actually fact the issues were fixed with the train being in service for a year or two after. Also the business case changed for the WCML.

Intercity 225 is heavily based on APT and in actual fact is not much different from the planned APT-S fleet, even MK4 was deisgned to tilt!

Intercity 225 has been an excellent and successful train over the last 30 years let down by poor coach interiors in its first 15 years of operation.
 

zn1

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2011
Messages
435
My old dear who is now in her early 70s hates the pendolinos - she is always complaining of motion sickness when travelling on them, but then she recently travelled on the Voyagers and didnt get any motion sickness, i had no answer for her, so what does one tell her ? why on electric tilt she gets motion sickness but on DEMU Tilt she doesnt ??

she always goes north from MKC - she has yet to experience the fun south of MKC,
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
2,174
Location
Huyton
My old dear who is now in her early 70s hates the pendolinos - she is always complaining of motion sickness when travelling on them, but then she recently travelled on the Voyagers and didnt get any motion sickness, i had no answer for her, so what does one tell her ? why on electric tilt she gets motion sickness but on DEMU Tilt she doesnt ??

she always goes north from MKC - she has yet to experience the fun south of MKC,

Voyagers don’t tilt to the same angle as pendolinos.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
The Voyagers tilt even less than the Pendolinos (6° vs 8°), although I wonder if there is also anything to do with other factors like the larger windows?
 

alangla

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2018
Messages
1,178
Location
Glasgow
I vaguely remember seeing a film of the APT press runs where a BR engineer put a coffee jar on its side through some curves and the jar hardly moved. On a Pendolino it would move a bit, a Voyager more so. On an HST it would be flying across the coach. I think the lack of movement is the"perfect" tilt.

Edit to add - having been on a Pendolino with failed tilt, the difference in movement of stuff on the tables is remarkable - even with the speed restrictions that tilt failure imposes
 

The_Engineer

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2018
Messages
524
I also recall that APT has what is called reactive tilt, so on entering a curve there's a lag before tilt kicks in and corrects the forces. Tilt on the WCML is achieved by the train detecting balises just before the curve which, with a speed calculation, allows tilt to come in right at the start of the curve. In other word the trains "anticipates" the curve. It was thought this made a big difference in the prevention of nausea.
 

James James

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2018
Messages
432
I also recall that APT has what is called reactive tilt, so on entering a curve there's a lag before tilt kicks in and corrects the forces. Tilt on the WCML is achieved by the train detecting balises just before the curve which, with a speed calculation, allows tilt to come in right at the start of the curve. In other word the trains "anticipates" the curve. It was thought this made a big difference in the prevention of nausea.
The second research paper I linked to above goes into a fair bit of detail on reactive vs predictive tilt. I haven't heard of the SBB bothering to upgrade their ICN's (the trains that were used for the study) from reactive to predictive tilt though...
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
8,329
I recall that "feeling sick" was reported after the first press run of APT - but some people thought that sickness might have been due to consumption of too much ethanol by some of the media people.....
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,257
My old dear who is now in her early 70s hates the pendolinos - she is always complaining of motion sickness when travelling on them, but then she recently travelled on the Voyagers and didnt get any motion sickness, i had no answer for her, so what does one tell her ? why on electric tilt she gets motion sickness but on DEMU Tilt she doesnt ??

she always goes north from MKC - she has yet to experience the fun south of MKC,

Were those VTWC Voyagers, as they're the only ones which tilt, the Cross Country ones don't
 

strimmer

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2010
Messages
161
I traveled from Euston to Preston on the APT on 24th August 1984, along with my two sons. None of us felt sick at all, nor did anybody else in the coach we were in.
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,320
Don't forget that sometimes the psychological effect of motion sickness can be extremely strong. I suffer from fairly chronic motion sickness and the thought of some events can trigger a response without even experiencing them. If somebody were to come to the conclusion that the train made them unwell, it might stay that way indefinitely even if the source of the sickness were actually removed...
 

The_Engineer

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2018
Messages
524
I traveled from Euston to Preston on the APT on 24th August 1984, along with my two sons. None of us felt sick at all, nor did anybody else in the coach we were in.
It does vary from person to person. And alcohol intake didn't help on the press run.....
 

ericlesley

Member
Joined
12 Sep 2017
Messages
17
Didn't British rail sell their research and patents to fiat? So the pendilino is essentially an improvement of the ATP
 

nuneatonmark

Member
Joined
5 Aug 2014
Messages
491
Didn't British rail sell their research and patents to fiat? So the pendilino is essentially an improvement of the ATP
Yes, another brilliant British invention sold on the cheap so someone else could make money out of it. The government of the time should have been shot. Just think of all the jobs we could have had in this country and the foundation for a world leading train design and manufacturing company that would have been.
 

dgl

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2014
Messages
3,056
Yes, another brilliant British invention sold on the cheap so someone else could make money out of it. The government of the time should have been shot. Just think of all the jobs we could have had in this country and the foundation for a world leading train design and manufacturing company that would have been.

Remember though that FIAT already had developed the original Pendolino before acquiring any technology from BR.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,572
Location
Macclesfield
The APT tilted to 12 degrees which was to much, Pendos only do 8 Degrees.
The APT-P trains tilted to a maximum of 9 degrees. The APT-E had passive provision for up to 12 degrees of tilt within the loading gauge designed into the profile of the bodyshell and the capability of the tilt system, but was also limited to 9 in main line testing.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,652
Location
Nottingham
Remember though that FIAT already had developed the original Pendolino before acquiring any technology from BR.
The original Pendolino, and the tilting Talgos and I think the LRC in Canada also, used a passive tilt system. Basically the train is suspended from a pivot high up and swings outwards like a pendulum in response to the centrifugal forces. This has the obvious disadvantage that the pivot and its supports intrude into what would otherwise be passenger service. The lower parts of the train swinging outward probably mean it would have to be even narrower in this area to clear British platforms (and hence have a big gap when stopped at those platforms). The move outward of the centre of gravity also increases the risk of overturning on curves, but this may be insignificant relative to other factors that limit curving speed.

The APT and the current Pendolino use an active tilt system where the body is actually rotated around an axis which roughly coincides with the centre of gravity, which therefore does not move much. This can apply tilt more accurately and quickly than a passive system and the body narrowing higher up is less of a constraint on the interior or the stepping distances.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,909
Location
Fenny Stratford
The APT is one of the big what if's - I also wonder if the problems with the ride were as bad as were suggested ( the problems with the project seem clear!)

Yes, another brilliant British invention sold on the cheap so someone else could make money out of it. The government of the time should have been shot. Just think of all the jobs we could have had in this country and the foundation for a world leading train design and manufacturing company that would have been.

I am fairly certain that might be a bit of an overreaction. I suspect this will have been done by the Thatcher government of the mid 80's. Now selling this technology on the cheap might be a bad thing. I suspect people could think of worse things they did.
 

boxy321

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2016
Messages
449
There are people that get sea sick on the canal. For them a Chiltern class 168 is there. We'll stick to the quick stuff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top