(How I hate those ad-riddled local newspaper sites)
Anyway, lots of hot air from a less than useless MP whose only guarantee of a job is that people in this area don't like voting for any other party. I'm sure Arriva are quaking in their boots at his threat to do "everything in his power" to remove them at the next franchise. This from an MP that sends most of his time talking waffle in the House to stop certain bills from being heard and voted on. I wouldn't hold him to his word, heck I wouldn't buy a second hand car from the man.
All of this does beg a question though. I can understand strong feelings against Northern on here from members of staff, but from a wider perspective they have been improving for most passengers and for most this new policy simply means a trip to the ticket machine before getting onboard. Its really not a hardship for most, and is pretty standard on rail networks around the world. So like I have said previously, I cautiously welcome this scheme providing of course they ensure that passengers are given at least some more information on what is expected of them, and the policy is handled sensibly especially in the first few months as it beds in. So why doesn't everyone at least see just how it actually works out, instead of leaping to conclusions and making assumptions? I for one as a user of these lines daily be very interested to see just how it pans out, and if it works and reduces the chronic fare evasion I see on a regular basis I will welcome it.