• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Midland Mainline Class 170 Turbostars Replaced What?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,741
Location
Nottingham
What are these 'RVAR' things, and why did the MML 170s have to be introduced before they applied?

Rail Vehicle Accessiblity Regulations, prescribing accessible toilets, information displays, priority seats etc, but only for new stock coming into service after a cut-off date which was I think 31 December 1997. Older stock remaining in service after 2020 will have be modified to meet a similar set of rules.
 

Emblematic

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2013
Messages
659
Rail Vehicle Accessiblity Regulations, prescribing accessible toilets, information displays, priority seats etc, but only for new stock coming into service after a cut-off date which was I think 31 December 1997. Older stock remaining in service after 2020 will have be modified to meet a similar set of rules.

The in-service date was December 1998, but the rest is correct. It should be pointed out that the manufacturers were not avoiding making their trains accessible, but the exact details of the legislation were unclear during the design stage, so there was a risk of missing some of the specifications (which did change from earlier drafts.) The early 170s are very close to compliance for 2020, with some minor dimension discrepancies which will probably be given dispensations. It caused issues for other units around this time, the class 458s notably needed the PIS displays replacing.
 

whhistle

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
The brief period where 170s were considered suitable units for mainline express services (on the MML, ECML and GEML) was a weird time
I'd argue that they weren't really "intercity" type work though, as the stops were frequent compared with the HST. If the Turbostars were 4/5 coaches long, they were quite suitable for the stopping services surely?

Can't really comment on other operator uses.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,278
I'd argue that they weren't really "intercity" type work though, as the stops were frequent compared with the HST. If the Turbostars were 4/5 coaches long, they were quite suitable for the stopping services surely?

Can't really comment on other operator uses.

Yes, more akin to the Chiltern 168s operating to Birmingham or the London Midland 350s.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,278
The time when 2-car DMUs were felt suitable for such services, more interestingly. A railway still with a feel of decline in many ways.

A little bit harsh, considering these were for additional services. Maybe 175/180s with their end doors might have been more appropriate?
 

Helvellyn

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2009
Messages
2,581
The in-service date was December 1998, but the rest is correct. It should be pointed out that the manufacturers were not avoiding making their trains accessible, but the exact details of the legislation were unclear during the design stage, so there was a risk of missing some of the specifications (which did change from earlier drafts.) The early 170s are very close to compliance for 2020, with some minor dimension discrepancies which will probably be given dispensations. It caused issues for other units around this time, the class 458s notably needed the PIS displays replacing.
Not quite with the 458s - the LED colour was changed and the bulbs were slightly spread out across the vertical axis to achieve the correct height! They were only milimetres out for compliance. The disabled loos had to be modified though because they were not compliant - I think the regulations require that the sink be used from a sitting position, i.e. on the loo.
 

woodhouse122

Member
Joined
9 Aug 2011
Messages
223
i can remember doing the 170s from sheffield to barnsley and back when they with midland mainline (around lunchtime if i can remember) used to be a good run (plus there used to be free hot drinks as well :D )
 

Mugby

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2012
Messages
2,138
Location
Derby
There was some controversy surrounding the procurement of the Midland Mainline 170s which led to the then incumbent managing director being sacked. I can't remember the exact details but I understand they were ordered without the necessary authority or approval.

I remember them as being totally inadequate and unsuitable for the purpose, the pitch of the standard seating made legroom almost non existent, some seats were inward facing and some were very close to the toilet door. I believe they were poor performers at first too, such as climbing northwards away from Kettering with a full load, they struggled quite noticeably.

The full enhanced service was due to start from mid-1999. The service before that was really quite abysmal, one train per hour from Derby, stopping at three or four intermediate stations, if it didn't stop at the one you wanted, you changed at Leicester and waited half an hour for the one from Nottingham which probably did.
Amazingly, the service reduced to every hour and a half on Saturdays. not even as good as in BR days.

I never thought the additional centre car in the 170s mad a great deal of difference, a substantial part of it was taken up by the first class section and the buffet section which was not exactly a great idea but it was just at the time when first class passengers started to get the free goodies.
The best thing about the centre cars was after the whole lot was transferred to XC and the first class was de-classified. I had several comfortable rides from Derby to Cardiff in the pseudo first class area, which rapidly became very tatty indeed!
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,292
I never thought the additional centre car in the 170s mad a great deal of difference, a substantial part of it was taken up by the first class section and the buffet section which was not exactly a great idea but it was just at the time when first class passengers started to get the free goodies.
The best thing about the centre cars was after the whole lot was transferred to XC and the first class was de-classified. I had several comfortable rides from Derby to Cardiff in the pseudo first class area, which rapidly became very tatty indeed!

Indeed, when they were with Central they could be found on Derby - Matlock or even Skegness runs with their random unit generator
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top