Just a quick question to help me with a discussion elsewhere on Southern DOO please, if anyone's got the answer to hand. When did Gatwick Express go DOO, and how long did it take for their OBS-esque bods to disappear off trains after that?
I still fail to see how the OBS will improve customer service. They will be just the same as conductors bar dispatch (which takes all of 30secs tops).
So why not keep it safer with a conductor dispatching?
Just a quick question to help me with a discussion elsewhere on Southern DOO please, if anyone's got the answer to hand. When did Gatwick Express go DOO, and how long did it take for their OBS-esque bods to disappear off trains after that?
To bolster Govia's measly £100m annual profit.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I've only seen about two or three OBS/conductors 'patrolling' in the last several months, with first class abuse increasing rapidly. Those who DID check were excellent, but they are rare.
Unfortunately a lot of the Southern guards (certainly in my own area, not far from Deepgreen) do seem to be vestibule dwellers. Other favourites include not watching the train clear of the platform and leaving a panel open with a live key in and walking off to check their phone / sell a ticket / sit down, both of which if seen at my TOC would have you taken off track straight away and put on a competence development plan.
I do have some great colleagues at Southern but there are also a lot who simply do not bother. I've been telling people for a couple of years now that we need to make ourselves visible and useful to demonstrate the value of our role to the managers and bean-counters, and how some people have laughed. And yet, here we are... and the vestibule/cab dwellers and ne'er-do-wells are reflecting badly on us all.
I could be wrong, but presumably the difference as far as the DFT and GTR are concerned, is if the OBS go on strike, the trains still run, if the Guards go on strike the trains are cancelled. It seems to me the real aim is not to reduce the number of staff on trains today, but to reduce the bargaining power of the unions in the future by removing the mandatory requirements for a second person.
I have to say most Southern Guards do indeed seem to always leave their door control panels open with the keys in it unattended and leave their Avantix machine by the door unattended while they sit down and/or go on their phones and/or read a book between stops. And then you get some of them who prefer to stay in the rear cab rather than the vestibule. I would say as little as 10% of Southern Guards actually bother to check tickets. I regularly use up to four Southern trains (with Guards) a day yet the last time that i had my ticket checked was in March. Saying that though most Southern Guards seem like nice helpful people and will happily sell you a ticket if you find them and ask to buy one.
We all know what the DfT want to do long term....... cut guards completely and replace them with agency staff on minimum wage..or have to staff at all.
Railway staff get paid for what they know, not what they do. This mainly means route knowledge, rules and what to do in an emergency. That doesn't preclude them from doing their mandatory duties though. The standing by the door thing is a rule book mandatory so they should be doing it.
If southern are only on £29k then something went wrong. Great western are on £31k on the old Wessex routes, and SWT are on £36k plus 5% commission. (Non commercial are on £29k).
I agree with the comments that they need to prove their value though across the industry, not just southern.
I could be wrong, but presumably the difference as far as the DFT and GTR are concerned, is if the OBS go on strike, the trains still run, if the Guards go on strike the trains are cancelled. It seems to me the real aim is not to reduce the number of staff on trains today, but to reduce the bargaining power of the unions in the future by removing the mandatory requirements for a second person.
If, based on the average weekly shift hours worked at present, times the minimum wage at present, what does that equate to in terms of an annual salary?
Nope. All lone working, so I can't imagine many penalty fares issued.
I still fail to see how the OBS will improve customer service. They will be just the same as conductors bar dispatch (which takes all of 30secs tops).
So why not keep it safer with a conductor dispatching?
I see OBS's are currently on some GatEx trains, like those train hosts used to be for all of a few years.
If there are OBS people on Gatwick Express now, why get with of the train hosts previously?
25yr old + Min wage £7.20
£7.20 * 35hr week = £252
52 * £252 = £13,104
Is there any wonder why we have so many people signing on for the dole.
OBS on GatEx for learning the ropes on a DOO service but on route (especially the Brighton extensions) where OBS will be used by SN???
If so it may be temporary...
No, there are dedicated OBSs for GX (and the plan is for more).
So like I said, why get rid of the train hosts? Was that a mistake that Govia Thameslink Railway now wish to correct?No, there are dedicated OBSs for GX (and the plan is for more).
So like I said, why get rid of the train hosts? Was that a mistake that Govia Thameslink Railway now wish to correct?
Jobseekers Allowance for a single person £73.10 per week equals £3,801.20 per year. Sure you'll get help with your rent though that'll be enough to, maybe, cover your rent alone so nothing left over afterwards (and if you're in a mortgaged property you're stuffed to be frank).
Jobseekers Allowance for a single person £73.10 per week equals £3,801.20 per year. Sure you'll get help with your rent though that'll be enough to, maybe, cover your rent alone so nothing left over afterwards (and if you're in a mortgaged property you're stuffed to be frank).
And now they are wishing to. Bring them back under a different name, which suggests they policy to get rid of them failed as I don't see any major differences in the running of the Gatwick Express service. If they didn't need them then, why do they need them now.At the time it was probably an easy way to for the TOC to quickly save a few quid whilst avoiding anything remotely similar to the major and prolonged battle with the unions we see today as it was already DOO,
GTR are no worse than the rest of the industry in this respect, Where they've felt they can get away with it similar practices have been pursued at many other TOCs including finding ways of quietly reducing staff numbers involved in things like onboard catering, maintenance, ticket selling and revenue protection, cleaning regimes, station and on train security etc etc
Is £29kpa "bloody good" or just a reasonable salary that has kept up with inflation over the years.
It's more than my son earns as a Teacher, which required 4 years training...
I appreciate that and from personal experience I can tell you that when I went through my own time being unemployed I was taking in around £18k on unemployment benefits etc. At the time it was more than I had ever earned in my adult life. It was recommended, off the record, that I was better off unemployed than in my job at the time.
My issue with the complaints about how much Guards earn and frankly the complaints about anyone's wage. Is that having employment opportunity for unqualified people that has little barrier to entry, a reasonable wage, pension and benefits etc should be supported not derided.
I never went to Uni but why should I be artificially be denied a decent wage because I'm considered to be uneducated ?
I won't deny that I do see the railway as very well paid across the board* but I also see that as a benefit to all. Competitive employment benefits the employee. Being unionised helps keep that wage on track. Fighting for your job, wage, conditions etc has kept the Guards role a very attractive job. Is it any wonder that they are fighting ?
But still, £13k isn't going to get you very far (certainly not enough to rent anything) - and you'll still pay some tax and NI on that.
"Bloody good" is in the eye of the beholder, but it's certainly more than kept price with inflation and against Average Weekly Earnings it's done better still. It's more than my son earns as a Teacher, which required 4 years training...