• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Could the Oxford Tube Work for Other Towns?

Status
Not open for further replies.

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,737
Well this isn't the thread to be debating Boris Johnson's term as mayor but far more people are cycling nowadays because it is a lot safer now, I'd hardly call that depressing.



Low morale amongst bus drivers has more to do with the race to the bottom as far as wages are concerned but that's route tendering for you.



Some London bus drivers are on £15 an hour. Admittedly it's those with senior drivers with long service but I've never been paid that for driving a pcv.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Were you to read Kings Ferry's twitter page you'd think they were awful. Then read Chalkwell's when they break down, and have to wait 30 minutes on the side of the motorway or the A2 for the next coach to take them...



I don't think any company Twitter page is going to show it in a positive light when commuters are tweeting on it. They only complain and never ever praise. I had once saw a twitter complaint about a service I had been driving that had been arriving into London one minute late for the past 3 days. I mean seriously ?!!!
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
10 Mar 2013
Messages
1,010
The Oxford Tube seems to have been very successful, and I can't help wondering therefore why Oxford seems to be the only city that has this kind of bus service? Is there something that Oxford has that - say - Reading, Cambridge, Southampton or Brighton don't have, which would be essential to make a frequent express bus to London work? Or is it just a case of, noone's bothered trying it for other cities?

Any thoughts?

Oxford -London by road is more competitive time wise with Oxford - London by rail, other cities , unlike those towns and cities which have 100 / 125 mph rail to London ...

the fastest rail services to London from Oxford are via Reading ...
 

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,737
Oxford -London by road is more competitive time wise with Oxford - London by rail, other cities , unlike those towns and cities which have 100 / 125 mph rail to London ...



the fastest rail services to London from Oxford are via Reading ...


Oxford to London train services are scheduled to take an hour or a bit less. The coach from Gloucester Green to Victoria takes 115 minutes according to their website but only 70 minutes from the Thornhill Park and Ride to Victoria.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,274
I guess the big question going forward is how the coach services will be affected by the electrification of the GWR line to London and Crossrail, as even though Oxford trains won't go through the tunnel, it will be a more attractive route into central London than changing to current tubes and buses at Paddington
 

Ian Hardy

Member
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
458
I guess the big question going forward is how the coach services will be affected by the electrification of the GWR line to London and Crossrail, as even though Oxford trains won't go through the tunnel, it will be a more attractive route into central London than changing to current tubes and buses at Paddington

The electrification won't make much difference, the Crossrail trains from Reading will stop at every station from Reading to Acton Main Line before dropping down to the Paddington Crossrail platforms which will be a journey of about 60 minutes anyway and the plan is for there only to be a half hourly Crossrail service from Reading anyway. The HST fast trains with one call at Reading only take 60 minutes from Oxford. The rail users will continue to catch the GWR train from Oxford to Paddington high level and then change to whatever at Paddington. Half the Crossrail service is not intended to go any further west than Paddington anyway so the only people who will use the Crossrail service from Reading will be from the intermediate stations from Twyford and Acton Main Line.

I don't think anyone would change from the Oxford Tube or X90 to using the train because the time difference will not be much by the time you have changed at Paddington.
 

PeterC

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
4,782
I don't think anyone would change from the Oxford Tube or X90 to using the train because the time difference will not be much by the time you have changed at Paddington.
The terminus to terminus time isn't everything, there is also the onward journey at each end to account for. Victoria is a good terminus for the West End while Paddington has fairly poor onward connections. Crossrail is going to change that and may filter off a little traffic from the coaches although will probably benefit more from the release of supressed demand as a change at Paddington puts destinations such as Docklands within easier reach.
 
Last edited:

duncombec

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2014
Messages
1,160
Correct if I'm wrong but didn't Chalkwell take over the commuter services from Arriva/New Enterprise?

I remember the all day Invictaway service back in the 80's.

As I understand it, Arriva proper passed their Green Line branded service to New Enterprise when it was reduced to commuter only operation. New Enterprise then passed it to Chalkwell, who have now reduced the number of journeys they operate.

Maidstone is fairly similar to Medway and Sittingbourne in that whilst it has a good rail service, it is expensive and overcrowded, with the stations in the town centres and thus all requiring transport in from the suburbs. I am never quite sure why the support has remained high from North Kent, but not from Maidstone. Before anyone mentions demographics, the market from Tonbridge/Tunbridge Wells and Sevenoaks, which only (re-)started a few years ago has grown quite nicely (Centaur).
 

LexyBoy

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
4,478
Location
North of the rivers
For commuters:
- the coach offers big savings (it was around £1000 vs £4000 for an annual ticket a few years back at least)
- the coach heads out east, where the bulk of Oxford's population is spread, whereas the railway station is to the west of the congested city centre
- cheaper parking than Oxford station (which is £29 per day).

For students:
- 24 hour service
- avoids the trek to the station (especially from Brookes)
- the coach is perceived as being cheaper (actually not by a great deal)

For tourists:
- probably seen as easier?
- more convenient as it's centre to centre

Oxford -London by road is more competitive time wise with Oxford - London by rail, other cities , unlike those towns and cities which have 100 / 125 mph rail to London ...

the fastest rail services to London from Oxford are via Reading ...

Currently the only services between London and Oxford are via Reading, mostly on 125 mph lines (Oxford-Didcot is 90 or 100 IIRC). The coach is quite a bit slower, but as others have said both Oxford and Paddington stations are quite inconvenient, and compared to other cities the coach gets a pretty good run.
 

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,737
In the old days 1980s coaches used to do 80+ on the M40. Nowadays 60 mph is all that's allowed with longer (12 metre+) vehicles. Speed limits on the roads are also getting lower. How is that progress ?
By comparison line speeds on the railway are increasing on most main line trunk routes. Even the slowest Pacer (75 mph top speed) is faster than the newest most modern coaches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,748
Location
Yorkshire
In the old days 1980s coaches used to do 80+ on the M40. Nowadays 60 mph is all that's allowed with longer (12 metre+) vehicles. Speed limits on the roads are also getting lower. How is that progress ?

Coaches obeying the law sounds like progress to me. What speed limits have got lower on these routes?
 

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,737
Coaches obeying the law sounds like progress to me. What speed limits have got lower on these routes?



Well I'm pretty sure the 50 mph limit on the A40 starts sooner than it used to entering London and the drops to 40 mph on the Westway.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
My understanding of research in the area is that usually when road space decreases, traffic tends to decrease proportionately, so by itself the additional space given to cyclists shouldn't have had much impact. I suspect the real culprit is the growth in services like Uber - something that the Mayor is somehow going to have to tackle if he is to restore the reliability of bus and coach services.

The future Foreign Secretary (order your fall-out shelters now) abolished the Congestion Charge Area in Kensington and Chelsea, totally against TfL advice, as soon as becoming Mayor. I know people who now have to drive to work in order to keep their jobs thanks to the Southern Railway fiasco - not commuters to Central London, admittedly, but nevertheless adding to the congestion. Sadiq Khan has been left with a hell of a mess to sort out: remember Sir Peter Hendy's warning about social unrest if people were not able to get to their places of work thanks to inadequate public transport.
 

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,737
Coaches are legally allowed to do 70mph on the motorway, but are also legally required to have a 100km/h limiter. Which is at best bizarre.


Only those with a length less than 12 metres. Most new coaches are longer than that these days.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Statto

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2011
Messages
4,098
Location
At home or at the pub
the way the Oxford suburbs are spread out, it's more accessible to the A40/M40 where as if you want the station you have to circa & navigate through the City Centre so any time gained on the train is lost by journey getting to/from the station, then there's changing at Paddington adding even more time to the journey, so the coach is more convenient.

Most other place to place journeys though the train is far more convenient
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,989
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
the way the Oxford suburbs are spread out, it's more accessible to the A40/M40 where as if you want the station you have to circa & navigate through the City Centre so any time gained on the train is lost by journey getting to/from the station, then there's changing at Paddington adding even more time to the journey, so the coach is more convenient.

Most other place to place journeys though the train is far more convenient



Oxford has a sweet spot of

  • Poor rail links and journey duration
  • Good motorway links
  • Complimentary two way flows
  • Strong tourist and student demographic
  • Poor location of rail stations in Oxford and London compared to the centre
  • Location of large travel market on eastern side of city - en route for coach, off route for train

All of that "sweet spottery" makes Oxford fairly special
 

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,737
What about Oxford Parkway and Chiltern ? They seem to have invested heavily in that section.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Mutant Lemming

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2011
Messages
3,191
Location
London
What about Oxford Parkway and Chiltern ? They seem to have invested heavily in that section.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would reckon Chiltern will be taking traffic off First GW more than they will off The Oxford Tube - though they may take some off Stagecoach S5 and X5 routes to Bicester.

Re-opening the Cowley branch with a station at/near Blackbird Leys would help restore First GW's fortunes a little.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
The EU regulation reduced the speed limiter settings from 65 mph to 62 mph.

If we stop conforming to EU regulations that's not going to make a huge difference.

Well the coach will get three miles further every hour;)
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,435
Location
Yorkshire
Coaches are legally allowed to do 70mph on the motorway, but are also legally required to have a 100km/h limiter. Which is at best bizarre.
If anyone wishes to discuss whether or not this could change by leaving the EU, please see Will leaving the EU change legislation regarding coach speeds?

(If anyone wishes to go off topic, please click the "New thread" button (you can refer to the original post of course, and you may wish to copy & paste a quote into it) to create a new thread. If anyone spots an off-topic discussion, please report the first post you think is of-topic (if practicable), and if you wish to continue the off-topic discussion, feel free to create a new thread if practicable. We are much less likely to be able to split a thread easily if there are many off-topic posts)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top