PaulLothian
Member
I've just read it (thanks) and I don't see the need for the apologetic reference.
There was good guidance given by the moderators in blue upper case and in full references were also attached.
Why is it that folk (not getting at you najaB) feel the need to do this? I find the Wikipedia entries for railways most useful and this entry was very interesting indeed.
To be fair, I have generally found Wikipedia accurate for railway information, but it is possible to find horrendously inaccurate entries, sometimes deliberately put in for whatever reason. One of the penalties of crowd-sourced information!
It's a reminder that while generally good quality, it should never be relied on as a primary reference.