• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 460 DVT

Status
Not open for further replies.

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,859
Location
Beeston (Notts)
Perhaps, on subjects less wibbly, Network rail could turn them into inspection DVTs, to supplement/replace the existing Mk3 ones?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
Why would they do that? They're not long acquired, refurbished and fitted the Mark 3 DVT's with generators and other equipment
 

Philip Phlopp

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2015
Messages
3,003
Perhaps, on subjects less wibbly, Network rail could turn them into inspection DVTs, to supplement/replace the existing Mk3 ones?

They don't have any bogies - they're sat on accommodation bogies, their original bogies went into the pool for the Class 458/5 program, I believe so very severe wheel flats at this time of year can be dealt with by a bogie swap rather than wheelset change with a unit potentially out of service whilst that happens.
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Would converting them for use as DVTs for a loco hauled train mean a complete re-plumb and re-wire?
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,916
Location
Fenny Stratford
Perhaps, on subjects less wibbly, Network rail could turn them into inspection DVTs, to supplement/replace the existing Mk3 ones?

no, in fairness, that is fairly wibbly and begs the question: WHY?

Would converting them for use as DVTs for a loco hauled train mean a complete re-plumb and re-wire?

give it up - these units are ready for scrapping once every reusable part has been taken.
 

zn1

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2011
Messages
435
there will be a few spare 321 ATS's around im sure the technical staff could do some basic rewiring, replumbing of the air system so they could work in with the DMOS to create a couple of hybrids..nothing special about a 321 ATS. it is if i recall just a TSO with the lavvies fitted...
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
there will be a few spare 321 ATS's around im sure the technical staff could do some basic rewiring, replumbing of the air system so they could work in with the DMOS to create a couple of hybrids..nothing special about a 321 ATS. it is if i recall just a TSO with the lavvies fitted...

another case of "vast amounts of work to create two Franksenstein's monsters of limited use"
 

glbotu

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2012
Messages
644
Location
Oxford
Gatwick Express were under a franchise obligation to replace the 'aging' class 73s and associated stock. They only needed eight units for the service and so an order for eight units was placed. They entered service around 2000/2001.

It wasn't until the Franchise merged with South Central (2008) that there was an obligation to extend the Gatwick Express services to Brighton. Eight units simply wasn't enough for that and, by now, the class 442s were sitting unused after SWT had replaced them with new units.

The 460 Fleet was withdrawn from service and with no one needing an eight strong 'fleet' of DC only electric eight-car units, the fleet sat around doing nothing.

SWT then benefited as the 460s were very similar to their class 458 units, and so the instruction was given to convert the 460s into 458s, leaving four unusable driving vehicles.

Ah, I see. I didn't realise the fleet was so small. I've been on all incarnations of GatEx stock and remember the pseudo-InterCity Gatwick Express service, operated by Class 73s, but didn't realise they just like-for-like swapped them out. I guess having a mixed fleet would have been more expensive than just one common fleet of 442s.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,177
Class 460s were still in occasional use until 2012, having even made a few trips down to Brighton!

 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
I think that converting the 'Darth Vader' driving vehicles would be a good, but I don't think that they should be used with the class 442's.

I think that the DMLFO vehicles should work with the 387/2's that are do the purely Victoria - Gatwick airport services, as I presume that the majority of the 27 class 387/2's will be working Brighton - Gatwick - Victoria express trains.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,094
Location
Redcar
There isn't enough of them left to convert. Did you not read this thread?

Plus making a Juniper (designed and built by Alstom) work with a Electrostar (designed and built by Bombardier) seems like a recipe for disaster.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,177
Plus making a Juniper (designed and built by Alstom) work with a Electrostar (designed and built by Bombardier) seems like a recipe for disaster.

Do you remember what it was like trying to make an Electrostar work with another Electrostar? :lol:
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
Yes, I have been reading this thread all the way through.

There's only four DMFLOs, and they're lacking many essential components. The 387/2 will operate as a common pool. Your suggestion is entirely impractical and unworkable
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top