• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Pacer Froth!

Status
Not open for further replies.

5872

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2007
Messages
2,277
Location
A6-EHF
[youtube]r0G2BK04vsw[/youtube]


Flick to 1.34 Talk about bumpy :shock:.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

nath9425

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2006
Messages
759
Location
Milepost 84 Chiltern Mainline
"First Great Western say it is not their fault"

So they didn't invest in shoddy trains?

:lol: Bull****ters.

Me think's thats rather Appauling, I mean, get some turbo's down there and they will be complaining it's too warm!
 

P156KWJ

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2007
Messages
4,226
Location
Nottinghamshire
"First Great Western say it is not their fault"

So they didn't invest in shoddy trains?

:lol: Bull****ters.

Me think's thats rather Appauling, I mean, get some turbo's down there and they will be complaining it's too warm!

or some 373s and complain they're too european :lol:
 

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,657
1:34 is bumpy???

I grew up with Pacers and believe me that is not bumpy.
 

mrcheek

Established Member
Joined
11 Sep 2007
Messages
1,603
and to remind you all: THis is not FGW's fault, the stock was allocated to them by the government, who took the good trains and sent them oop north
 

P156KWJ

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2007
Messages
4,226
Location
Nottinghamshire
what?? The north gets trains that are ****!! Northern don't operate any post-privatisation trains bar 333s, same with EMT bar 222s! and just because the FGW people get a few 1980s trains it becomes a national scandal! boo-hoo...
 

devon_metro

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2005
Messages
7,715
Location
London
"First Great Western say it is not their fault"

So they didn't invest in shoddy trains?

:lol: Bull****ters.

Me think's thats rather Appauling, I mean, get some turbo's down there and they will be complaining it's too warm!

Sounds like you are the bull****ter!

The DafT forced these trains on the south, and its quite simply scandalous how they are allowed to do it considering that they were removed because they caused problems in in SW. Short sighted and damn right farcical. Passenger numbers in Devon warrant a fleet of new trains funded by the government. But no. Don't see why the North is complaining, they will be the ones using them in summer when they come down to the SW and trash our county!!
 

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,657
Sounds like you are the bull****ter!

The DafT forced these trains on the south, and its quite simply scandalous how they are allowed to do it considering that they were removed because they caused problems in in SW. Short sighted and damn right farcical. Passenger numbers in Devon warrant a fleet of new trains funded by the government. But no. Don't see why the North is complaining, they will be the ones using them in summer when they come down to the SW and trash our county!!

If that argument was used, you would be getting a lot of cascaded stock from the north as we are desperate for extra capacity. Much more desperate than the south west anyway.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,168
Location
0035
The actual truth is that the South West does not spend as much money lobbying Government as the North does (and that's not just transport). The transport in the South West might not be as over-capacity as the North because in many areas it is less attractive (higher fares, worse stations, less frequent trains, etc.) but an appraisal of the area would actually reveal it is in more need of investment, due to a stronger economy and higher congestion.
 

mrcheek

Established Member
Joined
11 Sep 2007
Messages
1,603
no, its because the south never vote Labour anyway, so the government ignores us. In a couple of years when we kick out the most unpopular Prime Minister in history and replace him with David Cameron, then maybe we will get some decent trains back here in Tory country.
 

Respite

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2006
Messages
765
Location
Staffordshire
In a couple of years when we kick out the most unpopular Prime Minister in history and replace him with David Cameron, then maybe we will get some decent trains back here in Tory country.

More like some very nice new roads & bypasses!
 

devon_metro

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2005
Messages
7,715
Location
London
Back in Summer '06 Cameron said he wanted to renationalise the railways :shock: YEAH WHATEVER, JOG ON MATE!

Tories actually seem a lot more concerned about green issues. I mean look at the legendary Boris Johnson!
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,168
Location
0035
The period 1979 - 1997 saw the biggest number of station, service & line openings or reopenings since the railway booms many years earlier.

Certaintly the Conservatives under Cameron are far more green than 'new' Labour. One party that really has it in for the railways are the Lib Dems who in many parts of the country have suggested turning railway routes into bus lanes!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top