I'd go for the full English. Whether they'd have it on the 10:00 Saturday departure from Penzance is another matter.
I think that one is a dinner (or is it luncheon
I'd go for the full English. Whether they'd have it on the 10:00 Saturday departure from Penzance is another matter.
I think that one is a dinner (or is it luncheon) Pullman train from Plymouth.
I once used the travelling chef service because it was just that a travelling chef. That was the last time I was on such a service. In contrast am fairly often on services with trolleys and I just don't use them. No added value beyond bring my own. Yes it's at seat but my kitchen with food is at home and cheaper. With a chef service I don't mind paying more. Perhaps I'm in the minority.
We sometimes take our own food, sometimes we don't. It depends on how flush we are, how we feel and why we are travelling. I rarely carry food if I am on my own, as I dislike the hassle of dragging things around with me!
I'd certainly be prepared to pay more for freshly prepared food as opposed to pre packed, though.
Very good of her to carry your food!This reminds me of the old chestnut - customs official to male passenger 'did you pack your case yourself sir?'
I think that one is a dinner (or is it luncheon) Pullman train from Plymouth.
The Travelling Chef is definitely a step above the buffet fare. I'm sure that losing the chance to have egg and chips or cheese on toast on the train will be a disappointment to people.
The menu has improved since the TC service was first introduced too. But it doesn't seem to have improved enough to make it viable. I agree that FGW must have good business reasons to withdraw this service.
How is the demise of Travelling Chef connected to the realignment of First Class accommodation with demand for First Class seating?
The food you can buy at M&S or Little Waitrose at railway stations (or, in Switzerland, the Co-opI must admit I never bring my own food when on days out or holiday. The thought of tinfoil & flasks make me cringe. I find it all part of the trip to buy onboard and always have done.
) is generally better and cheaper than anything that can be purchased on board the train.Never mind, more space for the Reading commuters who don't want to walk to the vacant Coach A because it's too far down the platform![]()
Id just like to point out that they are consulting on it at the moment, they havent said its going to be pulled for sure yet have they?
No Pullman service runs on Saturday's.
The food you can buy at M&S or Little Waitrose at railway stations (or, in Switzerland, the Co-op) is generally better and cheaper than anything that can be purchased on board the train.
Do we know when this is likely to happen ?
it is happening november.
I work them, he's right.There's little more to say that hasn't already been said, but your basic contention is that the 'problem' doesn't really exist: ie anyone standing on a fGW HST does so by choice, because there are seats available somewhere on the train that they won't use. There seems to be quite a lot of equally anecdotal evidence to the contrary.
The food you can buy at M&S or Little Waitrose at railway stations (or, in Switzerland, the Co-op) is generally better and cheaper than anything that can be purchased on board the train.
Which Little Waitrose shops are you referring to? We haven't opened any at railway stations (yet)
Kings Cross coming later this month....
There is one just across the road from Wimbledon station (main entrance)
I have a 1st advance for the 06.43 to Paddington on the 23rd
So tell me, apart from the full english, what is the difference between a baguette made right there and then or one made back at terminal and then heated up?
'Oh but it tastes so much nicer' or something similar no doubt will be the reply.
Id just like to point out that they are consulting on it at the moment, they havent said its going to be pulled for sure yet have they?