• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Dawlish sea wall collapse

Status
Not open for further replies.

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
Yep fully operational with no Temporary Speed Restrictions either.

Normal service (for trains at least) has resumed.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,864
Location
East Anglia
Had a walk as close as possible today and looking good. Several trips across also TSRS free & would hardly know anything had occurred here this year. The line is a credit to the orange army, the stations are a credit to FGW & the user groups/WI & the trains are busier than ever. Great stuff!!
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,774
Location
West of Andover
Looked quite good the repairs made in that area.

Sadly coming back a 143 got in the way of the breach site :(
 

Woody

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2006
Messages
277
With regard to the Dawlish line and its future, Network Rail’s chief executive Mark Carne and regional managing director Patrick Hallgate outlined their plans for the future of rail travel in the south west at a breakfast organised by the Institute of Directors at St Mellion International Resort (near Plymouth) this week.
A couple of quotes perhaps show what the railway experts may thinking longer term but whether the politicians will agree with them is another of course, "One added benefit of investment would be that an alternative route would be more suited to electrification in the future . At present, the seven mile coastal stretch of the railway would be difficult to upgrade because it is so vulnerable to the weather, but an alternative route would make it easier for electrification to be extended from Bristol into the peninsula." Note via Bristol!
Also "In the short term, work is now under way to make the Dawlish line more resilient by further strengthening the sea wall". Mr Carne also said: "There is a window of opportunity in the political space…. It's up to communities to bring it to a conclusion.
"We're experts in railways, we're not experts in the local economy. You need to help us in being able to sell that story to government."

http://www.westbriton.co.uk/Network-Rail-promises-investment-Cornwall-s/story-
 

LateThanNever

Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
1,029
With regard to the Dawlish line and its future, Network Rail’s chief executive Mark Carne and regional managing director Patrick Hallgate outlined their plans for the future of rail travel in the south west at a breakfast organised by the Institute of Directors at St Mellion International Resort (near Plymouth) this week.
A couple of quotes perhaps show what the railway experts may thinking longer term but whether the politicians will agree with them is another of course, "One added benefit of investment would be that an alternative route would be more suited to electrification in the future . At present, the seven mile coastal stretch of the railway would be difficult to upgrade because it is so vulnerable to the weather, but an alternative route would make it easier for electrification to be extended from Bristol into the peninsula." Note via Bristol!
Also "In the short term, work is now under way to make the Dawlish line more resilient by further strengthening the sea wall". Mr Carne also said: "There is a window of opportunity in the political space…. It's up to communities to bring it to a conclusion.
"We're experts in railways, we're not experts in the local economy. You need to help us in being able to sell that story to government."

http://www.westbriton.co.uk/Network-Rail-promises-investment-Cornwall-s/story-
Think this is in fact the link (bit of text missing?)
http://www.westbriton.co.uk/Network...t-Cornwall-s/story-21138103-detail/story.html

but interestingly too, according to the West Briton "In Cornwall, investment is likely to be brought forward in signalling that would see control switch to a centre at Didcot in 2018/9 and 10 signal boxes close in the Duchy. Originally due to take place in 2026, this would allow timetable changes so that long distance services are not held behind local trains and, at the same time, the amount of local trains could be increased".

It certainly seems counterintuitive to close down all the signal boxes in Cornwall in order to control them from hundreds of miles away(via the Dawlish sea wall presumably) in order to ensure that long distance trains are not held behind local ones! Can this be correct?
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
Think this is in fact the link (bit of text missing?)
http://www.westbriton.co.uk/Network...t-Cornwall-s/story-21138103-detail/story.html

but interestingly too, according to the West Briton "In Cornwall, investment is likely to be brought forward in signalling that would see control switch to a centre at Didcot in 2018/9 and 10 signal boxes close in the Duchy. Originally due to take place in 2026, this would allow timetable changes so that long distance services are not held behind local trains and, at the same time, the amount of local trains could be increased".

It certainly seems counterintuitive to close down all the signal boxes in Cornwall in order to control them from hundreds of miles away(via the Dawlish sea wall presumably) in order to ensure that long distance trains are not held behind local ones! Can this be correct?

It seems they haven't taken benefits onboard of having local signal boxes.
During the issues of February, Newton abbot to Paignton was disrupted due to the signalling running through Dawlish, Everywhere west carried on ok due to local boxes.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,317
They could route the fibre optic cables further inland if they wanted to.

But that might be a little more expensive.
Local boxes are not the be all and end all though.
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,226
An upgrade of the signalling in Cornwall is much needed. The present arrangements mean the headway through Cornwall is roughly 20 minutes.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,808
Almost all modern electronic signalling has a diverse route for the telecoms that control it, such that a single-point failure is does not fail the system.

So if Penzance is controlled from Didcot, there will be two separate telecoms links to support it.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
An upgrade of the signalling in Cornwall is much needed. The present arrangements mean the headway through Cornwall is roughly 20 minutes.

All that is needed is some intermediate block signals to break up the long sections, these could easily be controlled by the existing boxes but that of course is far to simple (and cheap) so we will have to spend millions ripping everything out and making the current signallers redundant! :roll:
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,226
That still wouldn't be that cheap. You're still looking at converting lots of Absolute Block sections to Track Circuit Block to allow intermediate block signals to be installed. And at the end you'd still only have a half decent system. Much better to do it properly and give some real opportunities to improve the service.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
It would only need one TC section from the previous AB signal to the IB signal at each location.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,635
Location
Hampshire
Network Rail announces follow-up work to Dawlish Sea Wall following successful reinstatement of train services

Downloads

Friday 30 May 2014
Wales & West


The footpath to be raised in Dawlish







The plans involve raising the sea wall in front of the site of the main breach, to provide extra resilience and support.


The sea wall runs at a high level in front of Dawlish, except for a 340 metre stretch between Coastguards Footbridge and Rockstone (aka Blackbridge) Footbridge. This section was left at a lower level when the railway was originally built in the 19th century due to pressure from a local landowner.

Now, however, the footpath will run at the higher level along the whole section. In addition to offering greater protection, this will mean that pedestrians will be able to use the footpath at high tide. Before now, the footpath was often flooded by the sea at high tide, meaning that safety diversions were needed.

The work will mean that some access to the footpath and beach is limited, but Network Rail is working closely with the local authorities and community to minimise disruption.

Julian Burnell from Network Rail said: “Many residents suggested this solution when we were dealing with the original damage in February and March. Now is the perfect time to raise the footpath and give the sea wall extra protection.

“We need to complete this work before next winter, so we will need to work across the late summer and autumn. We’ve been here long enough to know how important the tourist season is, so we’ll be making sure we cause as little disruption as we can. Wherever we can we will be bringing in material by sea.

“We are also meeting with local residents to discuss any concerns they may have. We’re confident that we can maintain our excellent relationships with the people of Dawlish.”

http://www.networkrailmediacentre.c...ng-successful-reinstatement-of-trai-209c.aspx

Rather than removing the shipping containers, it looks like they may be buried in - depending on what materials are used, i.e large concrete sections or a built up stone finished wall.
 

Rapidash

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
686
Location
Torbaydos, Devon
Ah, so they are double skinning it then. Excellent news. Should minimise the chance of a repeat performance!:D That'll teach that Victorian NIMBY!
 

colchesterken

Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
768
Anyone know if they are putting stone cladding on the new wall, not been down there for about 5 yrs but it looked from the piccies on here that the new wall was plain concrete.Mc Alpine would aprove but not Brunel, and I am sure English Heritage would not be happy
 

ian959

Member
Joined
9 May 2009
Messages
483
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Anyone know if they are putting stone cladding on the new wall, not been down there for about 5 yrs but it looked from the piccies on here that the new wall was plain concrete.Mc Alpine would aprove but not Brunel, and I am sure English Heritage would not be happy

I can't help but feel this is one time where English Heritage should be told where to shove it :) Sometimes the needs of the modern world override the need to preserve everything from the past. Robustness of the rail link to Devon and Cornwall is way more important than preserving a bit of stone wall. Yes I know, very unPC of me... That said I would be fairly certain that no doubt Network Rail will make the changes as sympathetically as possible. :)
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,272
Anyone know if they are putting stone cladding on the new wall, not been down there for about 5 yrs but it looked from the piccies on here that the new wall was plain concrete.Mc Alpine would aprove but not Brunel, and I am sure English Heritage would not be happy

There are a number of different finishes. Some areas have been faced in stone, some have been formed from concrete moulded to look like stone, and some are plain concrete. As far as I've seen on various websites and webcamms there seems no intention to leave bare flat concrete on the seaward side of the work sites, it will either be clad or moulded.

As they have just announced, the footpath at the main breach site is now to be raised, so that will almost certainly hide the front face of the concrete slabs used to repair the damage.
 

daikilo

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Messages
1,623
I can't help but feel this is one time where English Heritage should be told where to shove it :) Sometimes the needs of the modern world override the need to preserve everything from the past. Robustness of the rail link to Devon and Cornwall is way more important than preserving a bit of stone wall. Yes I know, very unPC of me... That said I would be fairly certain that no doubt Network Rail will make the changes as sympathetically as possible. :)

Keying in a cladding would probably weaken the concrete, so not a good idea! Also, not sure Brunel would disapprove as he had an eye for efficiency. Finally, EH doesn't really have a plan following total destruction. Indeed, if anything, it is be quick to protect the rest. Better move those containers before they become landmarks.
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,304
How could reinstating the Okehampton line cost that much? There's no point building it to be a proper mainline link that would be used by long-distance trains every day. A single track line with a passing loop or two would be more than sufficient, especially when the section to be reinstated is not the majority of the distance along the route from Exeter to Plymouth. I feel this is going to be a manifesto item for 2015 because if Scotland can reopen the Waverley Route then there's no reason a UK Government can't reopen this one.
 

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
2,437
There's no point building it to be a proper mainline link that would be used by long-distance trains every day. A single track line with a passing loop or two would be more than sufficient

Is there really much point building it if it can't be used as a diversion / replacement for the route through Dawlish when that's closed?

What would the public / press response be after spending millions of pounds on reinstating the route after this closure, only to result in there being one or two trains an hour, and every service still disrupted next time that Dawlish shuts?
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,451
Well what was the point of reopening the Waverley? Surely that wasn't for diversion purposes.
 

Class83

Member
Joined
8 Jun 2012
Messages
610
Well what was the point of reopening the Waverley? Surely that wasn't for diversion purposes.

The Waverley Line isn't being reopened as a through diversionary line, but as a commuter line for Edinburgh, as are parts of the Okehampton Line for Plymouth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top