Is there a likelihood of it being dismantled? I can't see what purpose it serves!
I also think the statistic about it carrying four commuters a week is slightly misleading as according to TfL figures it still carried over 20,000 passengers last week (week ending 23 NOV)
Hmmm, if these numbers are correct then it doesnt bode well for the other well publisized, controvercial, unwanted, pointless and undoubtedly slower tourist transport elefant, the Edinburgh trams does it? If a supposed essential new link in London cant do better than this wthen what hope has an indirect and unsuitable (for those who want to sit down or take luggage) tram system to and from the airport got when a bus with wifi, leather high back leather seats and luggage acks takes a streight road in less time?
It has absolutely no relevance whatsoever to the Edinburgh tram project in any way, shape or form.
Apart from anything it was delivered complete, on time and on budget.
afraid I disagree that the Edinburgh tram is irrelivant. As already stated, the Borriscar was over budget and although completed on time it shares similarities with the trams in regards to speed of journey, convenience of journey and route, over estimation of demand and vitality and universal unpopularity, despite what TFL would have us believe
Hmmm, if these numbers are correct then it doesnt bode well for the other well publisized, controvercial, unwanted, pointless and undoubtedly slower tourist transport elefant, the Edinburgh trams does it? If a supposed essential new link in London cant do better than this wthen what hope has an indirect and unsuitable (for those who want to sit down or take luggage) tram system to and from the airport got when a bus with wifi, leather high back leather seats and luggage acks takes a streight road in less time?
It has absolutely no relevance whatsoever to the Edinburgh tram project in any way, shape or form
afraid I disagree that the Edinburgh tram is irrelivant. As already stated, the Borriscar was over budget and although completed on time it shares similarities with the trams in regards to speed of journey, convenience of journey and route, over estimation of demand and vitalitty and universal unpopularitty, despite what TFL would have us believe
if Londoners in that part of town were asked what they wanted, a fiver says noboddy said cablecar, just in the same way that if, when Edinburgh wen against congestion charging they asked us what we wanted instead, I doubt very many would say trams, and if we did, it wouldnt have been on there built route!↲
↲
Is it £3.20 on oyster or less?
I haven't the foggiest of ideas.
How many other cities have a cable-car like this, and not one where it is required to actually go up hills?
During the London Comic Convention, due to the number of people who attend, the DLR is usually suspended between Canning Town and Beckton ... The Cable Car is a handy alternative
£3.20 for something like that is cheap anywhere in the UK never mind London!
I disagree.
As a tourist attraction, perhaps. As a mode of transport, definitely not, more so if paying the cash fare of £4.30
Twice the price of a single bus fare and less than a tube fare. Doesn't seem that unreasonable. If paying cash, it is the cheapest way of getting from O2 to ExCel.
If it was included in Travelcards and daily caps there would be no complaints.
Twice the price of a single bus fare and less than a tube fare.
at £1.60, you can't beat that price for a cracking experience and the views.
I wish it was £1.60.
Little things like that have got to make you laugh!