• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Your Favourite TOC logo?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Electrostar

Member
Joined
18 May 2009
Messages
315
Reply to fgwRich:

Basically it's bringing the DLR stock in line with the current tube/Overground/Tramlink stock. The same as your fictitious DLR unit in LO livery earlier in the thread, but instead of LO orange you'd use the turquoise base colour of the DLR roundel on the cabs and doors. Oh and to be finicky, a thin blue stripe above the blue skirt!

I'm surprised TfL didn't at least order the newest DLR stock in this livery, rather than continue with the red and wavy blue lines.

Looking at these pics (not mine) from Wikipedia of the LU, LO and LT family of liveries you can still see minor differences in the way that the liveries are applied:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tram_2548_at_Arena.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Class_378_London_Overground_Diagram-detail.PNG

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Underground_D78_Stock
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,290
You know you can just get the template from wikipedia, and then just edit it in paint
 

Fincra5

Established Member
Joined
6 Jun 2009
Messages
2,636
The livery on the 395s look nothing like any of the liveries on the First traction anyway so I don't know where you're coming from with that.

The livery on the 395s is far more trendy and cool then the former Connex livery which has just got different wording on it.

Yh sorry. I thought the 395 was more purple than blue. Must have seen it in a birght light. If it were purple-ish it would look like a First Train with violet doors instead of pink.

Tbh i don't like the 1st liveries. Excepet for Local Lines, which is quite a interesting idea. They look very much the same. All of them just with slightly different vinyls.
 

Dai.

Established Member
Joined
2 Aug 2008
Messages
1,210
Location
Wales
Yh sorry. I thought the 395 was more purple than blue. Must have seen it in a birght light. If it were purple-ish it would look like a First Train with violet doors instead of pink.

Tbh i don't like the 1st liveries. Excepet for Local Lines, which is quite a interesting idea. They look very much the same. All of them just with slightly different vinyls.

The first local lines are you on about the one with the place names?
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
As for liveries looking the same, I guess you don't like NX, Stagecoach either as their TOCs share the same paint scheme! Which is done for the marketing purpose of giving your brand recognisation amongst possible users who might not be aware of who they are.

Take First for example, back in 1999 when they had various bus companies under their control, they decided on a single livery which would become instantly recognisnable with that local firm, hence when the user gets a good service or a bad service it can reflect on the owning group which is why some liveries look the same.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,617
Location
Hampshire
Reply to fgwRich:

Basically it's bringing the DLR stock in line with the current tube/Overground/Tramlink stock. The same as your fictitious DLR unit in LO livery earlier in the thread, but instead of LO orange you'd use the turquoise base colour of the DLR roundel on the cabs and doors. Oh and to be finicky, a thin blue stripe above the blue skirt!

I'm surprised TfL didn't at least order the newest DLR stock in this livery, rather than continue with the red and wavy blue lines.

Looking at these pics (not mine) from Wikipedia of the LU, LO and LT family of liveries you can still see minor differences in the way that the liveries are applied:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tram_2548_at_Arena.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Class_378_London_Overground_Diagram-detail.PNG

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Underground_D78_Stock

Like this i guess...
 

Attachments

  • DLR_New_Train_London Tramlinkv2.jpg
    DLR_New_Train_London Tramlinkv2.jpg
    34.1 KB · Views: 15
  • London_Overground_2009_Stock.jpg
    London_Overground_2009_Stock.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 12
  • London_Overground_2009_Stockv2.jpg
    London_Overground_2009_Stockv2.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 11
  • London_Tramlink_2009_Stock.jpg
    London_Tramlink_2009_Stock.jpg
    37.9 KB · Views: 11
  • Tramlink_Bombardier_Flexity_London Overground.jpg
    Tramlink_Bombardier_Flexity_London Overground.jpg
    36 KB · Views: 15

monkey

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2009
Messages
431
Location
Leeds
As for liveries looking the same, I guess you don't like NX, Stagecoach either as their TOCs share the same paint scheme! Which is done for the marketing purpose of giving your brand recognisation amongst possible users who might not be aware of who they are.

Take First for example, back in 1999 when they had various bus companies under their control, they decided on a single livery which would become instantly recognisnable with that local firm, hence when the user gets a good service or a bad service it can reflect on the owning group which is why some liveries look the same.
...do you think thats why arriva branded xc as new identity, not arriva? cos they have had bad rep in the past particularly up north, and so wanted to distance themselves...
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,617
Location
Hampshire
...do you think thats why arriva branded xc as new identity, not arriva? cos they have had bad rep in the past particularly up north, and so wanted to distance themselves...


irionicly thats it from what ive heard...funny though how XC has a bad reputation aswell which the media still managed to pick up upon and arriva still retains its bad reputation here...

oh and by the way, people might not like my views on various TOC's such as XC, but hang on, dont forget these are my views, everyone has there own opinon....
 

monkey

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2009
Messages
431
Location
Leeds
...ah interesting. tbh I was rather horrified when I heard they'd be taking over - not impressed with them so far, removing the shop an all, although I'm guessing they had to provide more seats somehow without being able to lenghten the trains...
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,617
Location
Hampshire
...ah interesting. tbh I was rather horrified when I heard they'd be taking over - not impressed with them so far, removing the shop an all, although I'm guessing they had to provide more seats somehow without being able to lenghten the trains...

True...but what i cant see is how removing the shop actually provides any extra seats...simple answer...it dosent...

The Shops on XC have been removed due to xc claing they had research from FGW saying that custemers prefer a onboard trolley service to a shop / buffet...BOLLOCKS...

XC have only actually increased capacity in the voyagers by removing a table or 2 and re shuffling the seats in that coach...nothing else...basically publicity for nothing...

typical Arriva...And if they do loose the XC franchise, GOOD RIDDENCE FROM THE SOUTH !
 

Heinz57

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
649
Location
Ilkeston
I honestly think there's a livery I don't like. But these must be my favorites -

1 - Midland Mainline (Blue livery)

2 - MML (Older tan green livery)

3 - XC (Very smart, particularly on the 221s and 222s!)

4 - East Midlands Trains (I didn't used to like this one, but its grown on me a bit)

5 - Central Trains

6 - Virgin (Very smart on the 57s)

7 - Gand Central (Quite basic which I think makes it better, it looks brill on Hornby's model!)

(Respectivley)
 

Fincra5

Established Member
Joined
6 Jun 2009
Messages
2,636
As for liveries looking the same, I guess you don't like NX, Stagecoach either as their TOCs share the same paint scheme! Which is done for the marketing purpose of giving your brand recognisation amongst possible users who might not be aware of who they are.

Take First for example, back in 1999 when they had various bus companies under their control, they decided on a single livery which would become instantly recognisnable with that local firm, hence when the user gets a good service or a bad service it can reflect on the owning group which is why some liveries look the same.

Hang on. Stagecoach maybe be similar because they don't slap STAGECOACH all over the train like First do. You could tell if it was a first group company as it undoubtably says FIRST somewhere.
 

90019

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2008
Messages
6,890
Location
Featherstone, West Yorkshire
Hang on. Stagecoach maybe be similar because they don't slap STAGECOACH all over the train like First do. You could tell if it was a first group company as it undoubtably says FIRST somewhere.

So?

It's a corporate image and identifies that it is First running the franchise.
 

Electrostar

Member
Joined
18 May 2009
Messages
315
FgwRich: Almost but not quite. Replace the green in your last DLR picture, with turquoise as Turquoise is the colour of the DLR roundel.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Continued from above... That way you'd show us what the DLR might look like if follows the rest of the TfL family.
 

Dai.

Established Member
Joined
2 Aug 2008
Messages
1,210
Location
Wales
Hang on. Stagecoach maybe be similar because they don't slap STAGECOACH all over the train like First do. You could tell if it was a first group company as it undoubtably says FIRST somewhere.

As 90019 has said it's not just a name.

A livery consists of -
  1. Colours of the company,
  2. Associated Logos to the company
  3. Staff Uniforms, company accessories (bags, pens, cups)
  4. Station colours.

It all falls under the Four P's in marketing, this P being 'Promotion'
[who knew college would help?!]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top