Haywain
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 24,558
On the whole, I am in agreement with the fact that ticket offices should sell the requested tickets, and would point out to those who think otherwise that no offence is committed by buying a ticket or tickets, but by using those tickets. If someone purchases a set of tickets that do not appear to cover the whole of the journey they are believed to be making they commit no offence. That is done by travelling and using the tickets, if it is in fact the case that they do not cover the whole journey.
However...
You should not be offered be offered split tickets though. Even if the clerk knows of a cheaper option they cannot possibly know of all the options (especially which is really the cheapest) and all the restrictions, and cannot possibly have the time to look such things up for every customer. Nor can every customer be expected to understand why different tickets are being offered and how that may affect their journey plans. Heaven knows, some customers struggle to understand the limits of an Anytime Day Return! And it isn't just split tickets - sometimes the cheaper ticket is for a longer journey.
I am astonished at the suggestion that a ticket office can actually choose whether to sell a ticket or not (leaving aside that the example given is a somewhat irrelevant one). There are enough problems in providing good service to customers without creating unnecessary arguments.
However...
If you request a specific ticket that should be sold. If you request fares for a specific journey you should be advised of the fares available for that journey in a manner that is impartial to different TOCs. For example, for a journey from Doncaster to London you should not be offered only the fares for Hull Trains and East Coast to the exclusion of Grand Central (and East Midlands). The only vaguely reasonable excuse for not selling a ticket is being unable to find it in the ticket issuing system, which can quite often happen with a temporary fare.If I go into a rail ticket office, I can ask advice of the staff which is the best ticket to buy, or (having done my research first) I can simply ask for the ticket, and pay for it. A good ticket clerk, knowing that the fares system is rather complicated, may well wish to ensure that I am buying the correct ticket for my needs. Thats fine, but at the end of the day, he should (legally must) sell me what I ask for so long as it is a genuine product. If I wish to buy a single from Thurso to Georgemas Junction at Penzance ticket office, it is my right to do so. It is none of his business why I am doing that. If I am asking for a complex set of tickets, it should be fairly obvious that I have done my homework and know what I want with no further advice required.
The company operating a ticket office receives a good commission on the products sold. Trying to sell me something more expensive than I require is, being charitable, poor practice. Doing so knowingly and intentionally is heading towards fraud (legal people insert the correct crime name). If I ask for a return from A to B, they should sell me that ticket it is what I asked for, buyer beware applies. If I ask for the cheapest way, by train, from A to B, and the cheapest tickets are split, if they know about it then they should offer me those split tickets.
You should not be offered be offered split tickets though. Even if the clerk knows of a cheaper option they cannot possibly know of all the options (especially which is really the cheapest) and all the restrictions, and cannot possibly have the time to look such things up for every customer. Nor can every customer be expected to understand why different tickets are being offered and how that may affect their journey plans. Heaven knows, some customers struggle to understand the limits of an Anytime Day Return! And it isn't just split tickets - sometimes the cheaper ticket is for a longer journey.
I am astonished at the suggestion that a ticket office can actually choose whether to sell a ticket or not (leaving aside that the example given is a somewhat irrelevant one). There are enough problems in providing good service to customers without creating unnecessary arguments.