• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

wires down at Northumberland Park

Status
Not open for further replies.

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
Seems the wires came down at Northumberland Park (on the West Anglia/Lee Valley line) this morning- they were down there on Monday too. Pretty sure this IS a recently rewired stretch? Certainly doesn't have the GE issues of being ancient kit.
there's a histrionic report from the Cambridge News here - hope the driver's OK, I know we have Greater Anglia staff including drivers on this board

Cambridge News said:
Train smashes into cable on London to Cambridge route

A train has collided with an overhead cable smashing its front window on the London to Cambridge route.

Police and paramedics helped passengers from the Greater Anglia train just before 5am today after the train was forced to come to a standstill near to Northumberland Park Station.

The drama was caught on camera by a passer-by who said he saw hundreds of people being helped off the train, with scores likely to miss their flights from Stansted.

Services are operating at “normal frequency” between Cambridge and London, but are diverting via Seven Sisters, said the train operator.

A spokesman for Greater Anglia, which runs the Stansted Express running between Cambridge and London Liverpool Street, said services were disrupted because of “overhead wire damage”.

He said: “Owing to overhead wire problems between Tottenham Hale and Waltham Cross some lines are blocked.

“Train services running from London Liverpool Street through these stations are currently suspended, and are being diverted via Seven Sisters.”

He added they apologise for the delays, which are likely to “last throughout most of today”.

An investigation will be held into how the train collided with the wire.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

PaulLothian

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2010
Messages
695
Location
Linlithgow
I enjoyed the actual file name of the Cambridge News article on my browser - 'Train-smashes-into-gantry-on-London-to-Cambridge-route' - no mention of this in the article, for some reason!
 

Anon Mouse

Established Member
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
1,274
I enjoyed the actual file name of the Cambridge News article on my browser - 'Train-smashes-into-gantry-on-London-to-Cambridge-route' - no mention of this in the article, for some reason!

You have to love local paper sensationlisim! :D
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
PaulLothian- that was the orgiginal headline- they're stealth-edited it. Except they're as competant at stealth-editing as the Daily Mail.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
It's admittedly not a route I'm familiar with, but 'hundreds of passengers'? At 5am?

From the figures given for the evacuation from the internal railway stuff, yes its in the hundreds of people on the train at the time it happened
 

47421

Member
Joined
7 Feb 2012
Messages
686
Location
london
i think it was very close - both mornings the up line remained open and i went past on up trains - if i remember correctly Monday the problem was just at Northumberland Park station and Wednesday was just north of it, close enough that it could have been the same section that failed. I might have misremembered this, but that is what it looked like to me

the other GA thread has closed, anyone got any more info about how GA are getting on generally? I am waiting to see the franchise agreement itself to see what they actually committed to doing, it will be interesting to see whether they will actually deliver on their promises if it turns out that the franchise is going to be a loss maker.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
another quick comment following up on the other GA thread re cross default clauses.

I think both posters were partly right about cross default clauses in old franchises: my understanding is that all franchise agreements have had cross default clauses, it is just that when it came to National Express East Coast they checked how it was worded and realised that it did not work. I think the problem was that the clause said if Nat Express East Coast defaulted then it would cross default all other contracts between National Express East Coast and DfT. What it actually needed to say was that if Nat Express East Coast defaulted then DfT could terminate all rail franchises entered into between any member of the National Express Group and DfT. Put another way the cross default clause was cross default only to National Express East Coast where it needed to be cross default to National Express Group.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top