Class377/5
Established Member
- Joined
- 19 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 5,594
Obviously I am just a passenger assuming the railway has decent contingency plans to ensure my service remains when the wires go down up north. I have no idea what the plan would be - maybe Finsbury Park or Cricklewood would be better.
Er this is a railway contingency plan but me sat there for 30mins looking at options to disprove the idea that come 2018, Thameslink would be worse affected. You realise proper contingency planning takes a lot longer right? It was a simple we can run fine proving exercise that's all.
Also you'd never get them serviving the 8 car Cricklewood. West Hampstead or maybe Brent Cross when that's built for turning purposes.
However back to the original point, you are saying that plan A is to cut out 50% of our services through London Bridge completely, which would lead to extensive overcrowding as it does every time a train is cut now.
You worried about your own service being massively over crowded when the incident is so serious the MML gets its service slashed from 15tph (tpday, 16tph in 2018) to 3tph. That's a significant challenge for anyone. I've already suggested multiple alternatives meaning Redhill wouldn't be as badly affected as the 50% your making out.
There is no extra capacity going to the Redhill Line in the peak in the new 2018 timetable (in fact in certain periods seating capacity will see serious cuts - although standing space goes up) so it will be the worse possible line to cut capacity in this instance.
Right if your claiming there no capacity to run anything extra in my suggestion of having removed some trains completely from Redhill is rather silly. If the (current) 2Wxx services do't run then there are paths available. If they do run as a Finsbury Park or West Hampstead/Brent Cross terminator from Gatwick.
Looking back at the documents and having a deeper look the 2Wxx trans are a lot more important as they are the only ones calling at Norwood Junction as well so are needed for that link.