• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Will I be prosecuted if I walked off from inspector

Status
Not open for further replies.

yhan

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2026
Messages
7
Location
london
So basically I tapped in with my oyster at a station but my card was short of money and I didn’t notice and had to catch the train cuz it was right there. And there was a train inspector on board and inspected my oyster, it shows that I have tapped in but with insufficient money. I didn’t give him my details when he asked for my postcode cuz I felt it was really unfair as I do tap in. And then my stop arrived I got off the train and he still had my Oyster card, my Oyster card was linked to my railcard. He also recorded me with his body camera. Now I regret so much I’m freaking out I should’ve just given him my details and get the fine cuz app this can be a criminal record but it was just the heat of the moment I just felt really unfair.

What’s gonna happen now would they have my details and fine me and give me a criminal record.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

gray1404

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2014
Messages
7,619
Location
Merseyside
There is nothing wrong with getting off at the station you were traveling to as you would have been overcarried otherwise. The inspector should have got off the train with you to complete things.

Is your Oyster card registered? That is what will determine if you can be traced.
 

rmHawk765

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2025
Messages
770
Location
ECML South
I may be wrong, but isn't there a 'debt' system where you can tap out with insufficient funds but not tap in? I am confused as to why it let you tap in, if you already had absolutely no funds on the card.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The other important thing AIUI is whether this was a TfL service or not.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Is your Oyster card registered? That is what will determine if you can be traced.
Presumably yes, as they said it is linked to a Railcard.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,141
Location
West Wiltshire
I may be wrong, but isn't there a 'debt' system where you can tap out with insufficient funds but not tap in? I am confused as to why it let you tap in, if you already had absolutely no funds on the card.
It won't open an entrance gate, but if station is ungated, then tapping on a reader is just noted.
From memory also shows a red light (or more precisely a tiny LED, that hardly shows up on a sunny day if reader is outside)
 

yhan

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2026
Messages
7
Location
london
There is nothing wrong with getting off at the station you were traveling to as you would have been overcarried otherwise. The inspector should have got off the train with you to complete things.

Is your Oyster card registered? That is what will determine if you can be traced.
It was linked to my railcard. He just kept asking what was my postcode when I said I needed to get off and it was my stop, he said that doesn’t matter that I needed to get off. And I don’t really know what he did after I got off I was too scared to look back and whe I tried to go back and find him he wasn’t at the station
 

rmHawk765

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2025
Messages
770
Location
ECML South
From memory also shows a red light (or more precisely a tiny LED, that hardly shows up on a sunny day if reader is outside)
That does count as not tapping-in, and it also does the lower-pitched double beep which offsets the LED issue. If that's the case then they have not actually tapped in, no?
 

gray1404

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2014
Messages
7,619
Location
Merseyside
You are quite entitled to leave the train and you informed him it was your stop so got off. No professional revenue inspector will ever have you be over carried. It does indeed matter that it was your stop and he had the option of getting off the train with you to complete his paperwork. You were not required to be over carried.

If you have not registered your Oyster card on the TfL website then hopefully you'll hear nothing further. When a Railcard is linked to an Oyster card they don't usually record the full rail card number either.
 

z444z

Established Member
Joined
17 Apr 2022
Messages
1,219
Location
London
What was your destination and what line or service did you use? Was it a TfL inspector that stopped you?
 

yhan

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2026
Messages
7
Location
london
You are quite entitled to leave the train and you informed him it was your stop so got off. No professional revenue inspector will ever have you be over carried. It does indeed matter that it was your stop and he had the option of getting off the train with you to complete his paperwork. You were not required to be over carried.

If you have not registered your Oyster card on the TfL website then hopefully you'll hear nothing further. When a Railcard is linked to an Oyster card they don't usually record the full rail card number
I linked my railcard at a tube station I’m not quite sure if it recorded full rail card number. I didn’t register the Oyster card defo except for linking it with my railcard as my mum acc found the Oyster card on a train and it was a visitor card we kept it cuz it was pretty lol
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,281
Location
Bolton
I may be wrong, but isn't there a 'debt' system where you can tap out with insufficient funds but not tap in? I am confused as to why it let you tap in, if you already had absolutely no funds on the card.
It depends. Hypothetically the conditions require you to have adequate balance for your journey before you begin it. In practice if your touch on is accepted you'll be fine. There is an exception but it's specific to bus journeys where you are permitted to travel on one bus should your balance not be sufficient. This doesn't 'hop' however in my experience, which cost me £1.50 once. Customer service may have refunded the amount but I didn't ask them to as it was so obviously my own error that I'd touched on with a card that was at zero.
 

yhan

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2026
Messages
7
Location
london
What was your destination and what line or service did you use? Was it a TfL inspector that stopped you?
It was a southeastern train within London and it wasn’t a TfL inspector it was a southeastern inspector

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I may be wrong, but isn't there a 'debt' system where you can tap out with insufficient funds but not tap in? I am confused as to why it let you tap in, if you already had absolutely no funds on the card.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The other important thing AIUI is whether this was a TfL service or not.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Presumably yes, as they said it is linked to a Railcard.
1 that’s the problem it didn’t actually let me tap in I believe that’s why he said I don’t hold a valid ticket as the tap in wasn’t successful.

2 no it wasn’t a TfL service it was a southeastern train line.
 

gray1404

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2014
Messages
7,619
Location
Merseyside
How have you been topping up the card? Cash or bank card? If they looked at your travel history would there be any regular travel patterns that might make finding you easier?
 

Sun Chariot

Established Member
Joined
16 Mar 2009
Messages
6,654
Location
2 miles and 50 years away from the Longmoor Milita
Hello @yhan - your post 1 states:
"...I tapped in with my oyster at a station but my card was short of money ... And there was a train inspector on board and inspected my oyster"

But your post 9 states:
"I didn’t register the Oyster card ... as my mum acc found the Oyster card on a train and it was a visitor card we kept it..."

So, are you saying:
1) the Oyster card you used, was one your mum had found and which had cash value loaded onto it?
2) "my card was short of money": the Oyster card? Your bank payment card? Or another card?
 

yhan

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2026
Messages
7
Location
london
How have you been topping up the card? Cash or bank card? If they looked at your travel history would there be any regular travel patterns that might make finding you easier?
I’ve been topping up with both cash and bank cards regularly at the two stations I travel from. And it’ll probably show my regular journey so might be quite easy to find idk

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Hello @yhan - your post 1 states:
"...I tapped in with my oyster at a station but my card was short of money ... And there was a train inspector on board and inspected my oyster"

But your post 9 states:
"I didn’t register the Oyster card ... as my mum acc found the Oyster card on a train and it was a visitor card we kept it..."

So, are you saying:
1) the Oyster card you used, was one your mum had found and which had cash value loaded onto it?
2) "my card was short of money": the Oyster card? Your bank payment card? Or another card?
No we found this Oyster card like ages ago I’ve been topping up the card. The Oyster card was short of money Yh cuz with bank cards even if it’s short it won’t get charged until the day after isn’t it
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,460
Location
LBK
They're not going to find you. Relax. TOCs can't audit bank transactions easily to find out who has been topping up an Oyster to prove who owes six pounds for an unpaid fare.

Get on with your life.
 
Last edited:

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,281
Location
Bolton
When a Railcard is linked to an Oyster card they don't usually record the full rail card number either.
They may have recorded a name and a postcode, but for all practical purposes it is quite unlikely they'll be able to do anything with that even if they get it. Nothing here suggests that Southeastern are likely to be able to find the original poster.

Please can I suggest that the original poster takes care to ensure that they have enough balance on the Oyster cards from now on, and makes sure to receive a green light or a touch in message before boarding the train. A bus is almost always available if you want to keep travel costs low on a shorter journey anyway. Everything else is likely to be just fine if they do this.
 

yhan

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2026
Messages
7
Location
london
They may have recorded a name and a postcode, but for all practical purposes it is quite unlikely they'll be able to do anything with that even if they get it. Nothing here suggests that Southeastern are likely to be able to find the original poster.

Please can I suggest that the original poster takes care to ensure that they have enough balance on the Oyster cards from now on, and makes sure to receive a green light or a touch in message before boarding the train. A bus is almost always available if you want to keep travel costs low on a shorter journey anyway. Everything else is likely to be just fine if they do this.
Will definitely do, only cause I just topped up and Thursday and didn’t travel yesterday so assumed I had enough money ☹️☹️

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

In that case you likely have nothing to worry about.
How come?
 
Last edited:

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,281
Location
Bolton
How come?
Because it is not likely that Southeastern have got enough information from you to find you. If they can't find your real name and address they won't do anything further. There is next to no chance that this is something the police would investigate.

So provided that you always ensure that you are travelling with a valid ticket from now on, they will have no further opportunity to connect these events to you. You should avoid boarding a train again unless you are certain you have a valid ticket or validated card.
 

gray1404

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2014
Messages
7,619
Location
Merseyside
Although is the OP also entitled to not pay for their journey? It seems to me that the OP was using the usual fillibustering technique to avoid giving their details as required by law.
I am saying that if an RPI is dealing with a passenger who reaches their destination then they should get off the train with the passenger to finish dealing with the matter. A passenger is not required to and should never be over carried just because the RPI has not finished dealing with them.

In fact in many cases the customer should make sure they are not over carried because this could give rise for another issue for them to be pulled up on if their ticket is only valid to said station.
 

reb0118

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Jan 2010
Messages
3,581
Location
Bo'ness, West Lothian
I am saying that if an RPI is dealing with a passenger who reaches their destination then they should get off the train with the passenger to finish dealing with the matter. A passenger is not required to and should never be over carried just because the RPI has not finished dealing with them.

In fact in many cases the customer should make sure they are not over carried because this could give rise for another issue for them to be pulled up on if their ticket is only valid to said station.

I get that. But you are probably over thinking the part about the inspector not caring about the passenger being overcarried. They, the inspecto,r is not causing this, but rather the passenger is probably wasting time to deliberately delay giving details until their stop to avoid further consequences.

I regularly get passengers telling me that "this is their stop" (sometimes even five or ten minutes away from the said stop) in the hope that they can get a free ride. I don't really care if it's their stop or not - if I deem there's enough time to obtain payment or details I will do so.
 

gray1404

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2014
Messages
7,619
Location
Merseyside
I get that. But you are probably over thinking the part about the inspector not caring about the passenger being overcarried. They, the inspecto,r is not causing this, but rather the passenger is probably wasting time to deliberately delay giving details until their stop to avoid further consequences.

I regularly get passengers telling me that "this is their stop" (sometimes even five or ten minutes away from the said stop) in the hope that they can get a free ride. I don't really care if it's their stop or not - if I deem there's enough time to obtain payment or details I will do so.
I see what you mean there. I was focusing on the fact that the customer could finish the interaction when they get off the train. But if, like you say, of they are stalling for time and no intention of providing details then that's a different matter.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,570
Location
Crayford
I may be wrong, but isn't there a 'debt' system where you can tap out with insufficient funds but not tap in?
When you touch in the system checks whether you have enough money for the cheapest possible journey from that station. If you need more because you're going further then the system will let you out with a negative balance, but you won't be able to make any further journeys until you top up. If you haven't got enough for the cheapest journey then your card isn't validated and you'll get two beeps, red light, and the gate won't open if it is a gate you're touching on.
A passenger is not required to and should never be over carried just because the RPI has not finished dealing with them.
Whilst I agree in principle, I would point out that you are only over-carried on an Oyster card if you leave the Oyster area.
as my mum acc found the Oyster card on a train and it was a visitor card we kept it cuz it was pretty lol
This bit doesn't quite add up. A visitor Oyster card cannot have a railcard discount applied to it, according to the TfL website.
 

gray1404

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2014
Messages
7,619
Location
Merseyside
For the avoidance of doubt, I meant should never be over carried in terms of the customers intended station.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top