xotGD
Established Member
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2017
- Messages
- 7,908
No more ridiculous than an HST power car on either end of a set of four coaches!How about Class 27 style, with a Deltic at each end? *wibble*
No more ridiculous than an HST power car on either end of a set of four coaches!How about Class 27 style, with a Deltic at each end? *wibble*
Yes, I think it was on a Sunday in early August 2002: about 11th August IIRC.I don't recall details, but didn't 55022 work a Liverpool St - Norwich vice 86 in the privatised era?
No doubt also the staff at the few depots that serviced them got to know them very well. If they'd been used more widely or even just transferred to another route then the reliability would probably have plummeted.The deltics did what they were designed for and lasted their designed lifespan. If you convert years to miles operated they way exceeded anything else in their time. As otjers have said there was no other suitable work for them. They were far outfront in reliability but this came at a cost as others have mentioned. For those who think they were unreliable that was not the case, they were extremely reliable but that came at a cost. In later years yes they were temperamental but this was due to a run down in maintenance and cost cutting. Lets not undermine what these fantastic machines, you had to be there to appreciate what they attained. If you weren’t there you can only dream.
No doubt also the staff at the few depots that serviced them got to know them very well. If they'd been used more widely or even just transferred to another route then the reliability would probably have plummeted.
There have been numerous other examples too, including with traction far less obviously tempremental than a Deltic. Just look at the reliability variation with the same unit between different operators in the Golden Spanners statistics.This appears to be exactly what happened when ScotRail took on HSTs. Reliability hit the floor, presumably because staff at Haymarket weren't used to them.
No doubt also the staff at the few depots that serviced them got to know them very well. If they'd been used more widely or even just transferred to another route then the reliability would probably have plummeted.
The Colchester plant has now closed.....
The number of locos that the operators kept smashing up and had to be sent for collision repairs wouldn't have helped!Indeed, it was unkindly said of Crewe Works that they were trying to collect the complete set of cl.47's!
Yes, I think it was on a Sunday in early August 2002: about 11th August IIRC.
Had one on the 1700 Liverpool Street to Norwich one weekday evening in the early 2000sI don't recall details, but didn't 55022 work a Liverpool St - Norwich vice 86 in the privatised era?
The 18 cylinder deltic engine was phased out by 1993 by the Royal Navy as the 50 year old Ton Class minesweepers decommissioned.To a point they were cascaded - to transpennine, and secondary ECML services.
But surely the limiting factor was manufacturer support, which I understand became thin after Paxman took over responsibility from Napier during one of the GEC asset-stripping amalgamations. With the Royal Navy scrapping its minesweepers as fast as it could, the total number of Deltic engines in service dropped rapidly making spares and servicing expensive.
I'm not sure if Paxman even touch them now - anyone know?
Should have bought more class 22 instead then.Oh, and Class 20s were built for 75mph. Type 1s were 60mph, Type 2s 75mph. What they didn't have was a steam heat boiler and a second cab.
In reality probably not a lot a 50 couldn't do compared to a Deltic? In the real world bet there wasn't much of a difference in performance as guessing a 50 would get power down better and probably at a lower speed?Bespoke fleet, bespoke role and limited numbers at a time BR was cutting back on traction types. Hydraulics had gone on the Western Region and the axe was already hovering over the earlier Type 4s (Classes 40/44/45/46). With the 500+ fleet of Class 47s and the 15 year 50-strong 100mph Class 50s on the WR where did BR have real need for a 22-strong 100mph Type 5 fleet?
D9000 worked several turns for Anglia from August 1998 to Jan 2000, then a one-off trip in August 2002, The Jan 1999 trip stands out as D9000 matched the electric times for the northbound run, with 103 mph through WithamHad one on the 1700 Liverpool Street to Norwich one weekday evening in the early 2000s
Yes, the mind boggles. Waterloo - Exeter? Sadly, not LST-IPS-NRW hourly expresses - 3300hp to flatten Brentwood Bank would have been a start, though clearly 86s, 90s and now 745s bring rather more than that to the party.
In reality probably not a lot a 50 couldn't do compared to a Deltic? In the real world bet there wasn't much of a difference in performance as guessing a 50 would get power down better and probably at a lower speed?
In reality probably not a lot a 50 couldn't do compared to a Deltic? In the real world bet there wasn't much of a difference in performance as guessing a 50 would get power down better and probably at a lower speed?
No more ridiculous than an HST power car on either end of a set of four coaches!
D9000 worked several turns for Anglia from August 1998 to Jan 2000, then a one-off trip in August 2002, The Jan 1999 trip stands out as D9000 matched the electric times for the northbound run, with 103 mph through Witham
That's where the advantages lies. Run the two Deltics on one engine each and you don't have an excess of power. Unlike the HST short sets.It is - two Deltics would equal four diesel engines!
That's where the advantages lies. Run the two Deltics on one engine each and you don't have an excess of power. Unlike the HST short sets.
They were actually fairly reliable - they were the most reliable of all the ER passenger type 4 & 5 locos for a number of years.
They were really suited to fast, limited stop services that took a few hours of constant thrash. The diagrams that involved 3 trips to or from Edinburgh in 24 hours were the best for them. The semi fast work they got at the end of their life did not and by this time they were well worn, having done about 3 million miles each.
They required constant specialist attention and that didn’t come cheap or easily. Depot, works or support staff (like me!) had to really know them, the move of locos from HA and GD to YK didn’t go as well as ER HQ had anticipated and by this time the 1970’s material shortages were adversely affecting the smaller BR classes availability.
There really wasn’t any further use for them as all the other lines either had their 100/125 mph traction or didn’t require what a Deltic would provide over a ETH cl.47.
In all my journeys behind Deltics, I only ever experienced 1 complete failure. Strangely it was 55.013 Black Watch ( always my favorite) and it was on the Morpeth curve that it came to a stand for 90 mins. I say strangely as Black Watch was always said to be one of the best and has been recorded giving 4000hp, this was explained as it had a complete rewire late in its life at overhaul
Their traction motors were deliberately beefed up for the last years because it was known they would be effectively thrashed on the services they were working, consequently they were far more reliable at higher speeds as the windings were much less likely to come apart hence many of the higher recorded speeds for Deltics coming towards the end of their lives.
What did they do to the motors?
I believe that they are the same motors as on the 37s and 50s, and similar to those on the 40s.
I'm afraid you couldn't be more wrong.In reality probably not a lot a 50 couldn't do compared to a Deltic? In the real world bet there wasn't much of a difference in performance as guessing a 50 would get power down better and probably at a lower speed?
I'm afraid you couldn't be more wrong.
Apart from this https://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/37623-fastest-deltics/ and especially this http://delticsounds.com/deltichowfast.html , Deltics had two advantages. Firstly of course power at the rail, typically almost double that of a class 40, and a third more than any Peak. They had a large advantage over any class 47, especially at higher speeds where a class 47 would be unloading beyond 87mph but a Deltic could handle full power to beyond 100mph. Add in 300hp reductions for ETH and the proportional advantage over a 47 or a 50 is greater still.
They were of course notoriously light on their feet when starting, but here's the other thing. Locomotives have to move themselves as well as the train, they have to haul themselves over hills as well as the carriages. A Deltic is a full carriage lighter than a 40 or a Peak and more than half a carriage lighter than a 47 or 50. The competition is handicapped from the start.
I urge doubters to look at accounts of West Country railtours hauled by Deltics, where local bashers will admit they had never seen performance like it on that territory.
Also, if our world returns to normal and any of the surviving Deltics return to mainline railtour duty, give one a try.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
50s also had multiple working capability, which Deltics didn't.
Wasn't the multiple working capability mostly used to double-head heavy expresses over Beattock and Shap prior to electrification? By comparison there was no conceivable express passenger situation on the ECML that a single |Deltic could not manage.
50s also had a far more conventional and unstressed power plant.
And weighed 119 tons as a consequence
Interesting to hear that said of one of the fleet Deltics.Black Watch was always said to be one of the best and has been recorded giving 4000hp, this was explained as it had a complete rewire late in its life at overhaul