ChiefPlanner
Established Member
There was deliberately "no new branding" allowed in the last days of BR. (with the exception of Thameslink which was allowed the "city scape" in a fetching grey. Known as the "Belgrano" livery y detractors.
North London had 37 x 321's , some of which were due a C6 exam , and returned in "base NSE livery without NSE or route branding in NLR days
The 313's were due a C6 post 1997 hence the new branding and livery - the 121 ans 117 units were hopefully to be replaced. (something which took a few years later - but the GOB and Bedford branches were then a very low priority.
Consider one marketing option, which was to describe the Metro services as "fast, frequent and fun"...............
We all know how supremely important branding is to some here , my priorities re "ambience" from late 1996 was to get the fleet , especially the 313's into a decent state of cleanliness internally and externally , and to have an absolute no graffiti policy. Passengers actually noticed that. A massive heavy cleaning campaign at BY helped.
North London had 37 x 321's , some of which were due a C6 exam , and returned in "base NSE livery without NSE or route branding in NLR days
The 313's were due a C6 post 1997 hence the new branding and livery - the 121 ans 117 units were hopefully to be replaced. (something which took a few years later - but the GOB and Bedford branches were then a very low priority.
Consider one marketing option, which was to describe the Metro services as "fast, frequent and fun"...............
We all know how supremely important branding is to some here , my priorities re "ambience" from late 1996 was to get the fleet , especially the 313's into a decent state of cleanliness internally and externally , and to have an absolute no graffiti policy. Passengers actually noticed that. A massive heavy cleaning campaign at BY helped.