Take out "Guard" in the above post and insert "Passenger", and you have an explination as to why some of my colleagues may not be the cheery souls we are always expected to be!
Some of you are
Kudos to the one from everybody's friendly (huh) TOC, Northern, who I saw wearing a Santa hat on an adjacent 323 approaching Manchester Pic this morn!!! It cheers my soul to think at least one person is willing not only to make the effort, but also to risk the stick for it!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I don't agree, frontline staff are not there to take abuse from anyone.
I go by the theory of treating people how they treat me, ask a sharp question without manners and you'll get a sharp answer off me, albeit polite but blunt. (e.g. someone comes up to me and just says "Wimbledon?" and I reply with "Platform 11")
Shouting/Abusive language/Patronising tone will be met with polite refusal to deal with the person and calling security staff to assist if it continues.
However my approach is to deal with every person as an individual, I do not let someone else who I dealt with earlier affect how I deal with others.
This made me laugh, it really did, but in a nice way. I'd feel terrible if I just walked up to someone I'd never met before and just blurted out a station! Also, I'd not be too sure of getting their attention!
That said, one cannot argue that this is more efficient. Which is good for the customer because they are out of your face faster and onto the train. But it's good for you because you can get back to assisting other people, who might have more complicated queries (Does this REALLY need to be queried with a member of staff in the first place? Are departure boards not plastered the walls over where you work?), or of course, doing the rest of your job.
Economists may talk to you about "Allocative Efficiency" - which the railway industry could do with a fair bit more of, true, but efficiency can be so cold sometimes.
Last edited: