• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Why didn’t CAF win more orders during early post privatization?

Status
Not open for further replies.

RacsoMoquette

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2023
Messages
322
Location
South Cambridgeshire
The CAF Zaragoza built Class 333s and 332s were such a minority? Why was this? As the Class 333s for Northern Spirit were the only new train order to be built on time, and to have a reliable introduction, unlike their contemporaries like the Electrostar, Turbostar, Coradia 100, and Coradia Juniper. My question is why didn’t more operators order the units?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
23 Nov 2023
Messages
771
Location
Grimsby
As @tfw756rider says they were Siemens units; Siemens subcontracted the bodyshell construction to CAF.

The 333s were unreliable in cold weather when new because if the pantograph hit ice on the overhead wire the onboard computer panicked, dropped the pantograph and shut the unit down. I remember a morning in Autumn 2000 when three failed almost simultaneously, all with a class 308 behind (so unable to assist) and the entire Leeds/Bradford - Skipton/Ilkley "triangle" came to a screeching halt. And that was far from unique! A reprogram largely sorted the issue, but I recall failing with one c.2008/9 for similar reasons, although by then the 308s had all been recycled into bean tins so there was a 333 behind which could assist. Even then the couplings had frozen so it was like a demolition derby to get them coupled up!
So largely reliable, but not 100%!
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,292
I can’t recall CAF bidding for all that much back then
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,022
Not sure about early privatisation, but certainly in mid years leading up to the Arriva Northern bid when they were aggressively touting their products, they were cheap on paper but financiers put a heavy premium on them for various reasons (local financing risk, ability to meet the spec, etc). I’m surprised it took them that long to break through, but not that they eventually managed it.

Post that the financing cost premium significantly fell away.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,308
Location
Bolton
Like most train assembling outfits, they mostly did have commercial success at deliveries to places nearer to where they had plants at the time.

Obviously, today, that includes Newport.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

As @tfw756rider says they were Siemens units; Siemens subcontracted the bodyshell construction to CAF.
Indeed so. It was also claimed at the time that if Siemens' plants had the capacity within the delivery timeframe to construct the 333/332 orders themselves they would have done so. I don't know if that's actually true of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top