• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Which ticket offices will avoid the axe?

Status
Not open for further replies.

mikeg

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2010
Messages
2,064
Location
Selby
Probably based upon ticket sales, there have been reports of some staffed stations doing as few as a dozen tickets a week.
You wouldn't be using the fallacy of using corona era data to justify these closures would you?

My local ticket office always seems pretty busy except in the late afternoon. If anything it has gotten signficantly busier in the past year as people return to train travel.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,987
Location
London
until the staff are withdrawn ;)

Trained staff are still needed to maintain TVMs on a semi-regular basis.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I dont see the need for this. At my station for platform staff we are split into groups because a huge roster is not viable, combining all the roles into one would get seriously messy from a roster standpoint especially at a london terminal where staffing levels are very high.

It’s perfectly manageable even at large termini. Often staff are on the same grade (or very close) already and you can combine rosters with very little impact if you know the planned numbers at a station.

As for cuts of staff, given the higher turnover of station staff it would more likely be natural wastage & no backfilling.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,630
Location
UK
You wouldn't be using the fallacy of using corona era data to justify these closures would you?
The figures released under FoI show that even the busiest ticket offices have only recovered to around 40% of pre-Covid sales volumes, even though passenger volumes have recovered much more strongly than that (to around 80-90% depending on operator/day of the week). That's clearly not a substainable position.
 

busestrains

On Moderation
Joined
9 Sep 2022
Messages
788
Location
Salisbury
Trained staff are still needed to maintain TVMs on a semi-regular basis.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



It’s perfectly manageable even at large termini. Often staff are on the same grade (or very close) already and you can combine rosters with very little impact if you know the planned numbers at a station.

As for cuts of staff, given the higher turnover of station staff it would more likely be natural wastage & no backfilling.
They could probably just use contractors to maintain their TVMs instead. I believe most of the main TVMs manufacturers (Scheidt & Bachmann and Parkeon and Worldline) offer this service. This is already used in many cases. For example the PERTIS (Permit To Travel) machines have been fully maintained and managed by Metric Group (the manufacturer) for decades and railway staff have practically zero involvement in these machines. So i reckon they will get rid of all staff and their TVMs will be maintained entirely by outsourced contractors.
 

Mainsideman

Member
Joined
6 Jul 2018
Messages
254
Location
Croydon
Trained staff are still needed to maintain TVMs on a semi-regular basis.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



It’s perfectly manageable even at large termini. Often staff are on the same grade (or very close) already and you can combine rosters with very little impact if you know the planned numbers at a station.

As for cuts of staff, given the higher turnover of station staff it would more likely be natural wastage & no backfilling.
like tfl just not filling vacancies?
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,759
Surely experience shows they’ll firstly get rid of all the staff apart from those essential for it to function? For example Guards at most of the current DOO operators were got rid of, rather than being retained in a purely customer service role.

Recent experience shows the opposite.

Southern with OBS, keeping the customer facing element of the role

LO going DOO, and closing ticket offices, but putting many more people at stations.

The general increase of staffing at stations, through extra security people, gate lines staff, etc.

Related to this, and acknowledging that one man’s experience does not prove a theory, but in the last 6 months I have seen far more staff checking tickets / patrolling for security on board DOO trains (Thameslink) than on trains with conductors / TMs (LNWR/WMT). I’ve used the latter around 4 times a week in that time and seen a member of staff 3 times.
 

Peregrine 4903

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
1,518
Location
London
Recent experience shows the opposite.

Southern with OBS, keeping the customer facing element of the role

LO going DOO, and closing ticket offices, but putting many more people at stations.

The general increase of staffing at stations, through extra security people, gate lines staff, etc.

Related to this, and acknowledging that one man’s experience does not prove a theory, but in the last 6 months I have seen far more staff checking tickets / patrolling for security on board DOO trains (Thameslink) than on trains with conductors / TMs (LNWR/WMT). I’ve used the latter around 4 times a week in that time and seen a member of staff 3 times.
To be honest I've never ever had my tickets checked on a Thameslink train and I use them regularly, but maybe its more of a MML thing than an East Coast Main Line thing.

WMT/LNWR I do agree, tickets are not check regularly at all and I use them pretty much everyday but recently they have been getting better I think.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
Recent experience shows the opposite.

Southern with OBS, keeping the customer facing element of the role

LO going DOO, and closing ticket offices, but putting many more people at stations.

What about:
Thameslink
Southeastern metro
Southern metro
Great Northern
 

whoosh

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2008
Messages
1,888
Station concourse shops selling tickets instead of ticket offices?

Select Service Partner must be rubbing their hands with glee!
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
5,050
I was amused earlier this week to see gateline staff helping passengers stuck in a long ticket office queue by directing them towards the TVMs.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
All done over 30 years ago. A lot has changed since then!

But that was my point? You initially said “recent” experience…


Related to this, and acknowledging that one man’s experience does not prove a theory, but in the last 6 months I have seen far more staff checking tickets / patrolling for security on board DOO trains (Thameslink) than on trains with conductors / TMs (LNWR/WMT). I’ve used the latter around 4 times a week in that time and seen a member of staff 3 times.

Me to, but let’s not misrepresent the position, either way!
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,759
But that was my point? You initially said “recent” experience…

That was my point! Ie that in recent times, staff changes have focused more on keeping, even creating, passenger focused jobs.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,759
But it wasn’t, you said.



So not in recent times… Let’s not argue about it anyway.
I’m not arguing, nor explaining very well.

my point is that recent changes have focused on protecting / increasing passenger facing roles, whilst reducing roles that have less of that. eg more staff on London Overground, the OBS role at Southern, the significant increase in security staff everywhere.

changes much longer ago took people out all together, eg the DOO examples you cited from 3-4 decades ago.

my point being that the railway is now more likely to keep roles that are passenger focused than those that are not, compared to 30-40 years ago.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
I’m not arguing, nor explaining very well.

Me neither :).

my point is that recent changes have focused on protecting / increasing passenger facing roles, whilst reducing roles that have less of that. eg more staff on London Overground, the OBS role at Southern, the significant increase in security staff everywhere.

I’d disagree that those are “recent”. I equally simply don’t care enough to die on this particular hill…

Mr. Rick, we will live to violently agree/fight another day, I’m sure…
 

ChewChewTrain

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2019
Messages
355
Sounds like my local ticket office (between Reading and Didcot) isn’t long for this world. To be fair, I’ve felt like it’s on borrowed time whenever I’ve been in there for the last 20 years or so. (I try to do my bit for the figures by using it whenever it’s open, but to no avail it seems.)

With the online options we now have (and machines that are at least improved), I can deal (albeit reluctantly) with the loss of our friendly ticket seller. But the closure of the waiting rooms would be much less welcome for me (and presumably even less so for the frail and vulnerable among us).

I know some existing unstaffed stations have an arrangement where a local keyholder unlocks and locks waiting rooms each day. I’d like to see this for every single station whose staff are on the chopping block; no reason why the waiting rooms can’t be open all day, thus making this development something of a win for those whose waiting rooms currently close at lunchtime on weekdays. If this isn’t possible for whatever reason then perhaps there could be some form of remote authorisation, as we already have for lifts overnight at quiet stations?
 

Scott1

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2015
Messages
385
Staff will continue to be required to man gatelines, to provide assistance as per disability legislation, and to carry out train dispatch duties where required. The sensible future would see these roles combined, along with a retail/general customer assistance role to provide support in purchasing tickets, into one multipurpose stations grade. It makes sense to everyone except the RMT.
This is already common on my patch in most medium sized stations. Smaller stations often combine the role of cleaner, dispatcher and ticket office in to one job. I suspect the smaller ones that close the ticket office will also close the toilets and waiting rooms as then they can be unstaffed. As for assisting passengers, at our unstaffed stations it depends if there is a gaurd. On trains that are DOO there's no assistance, and with the age of the stations usually a gap and step. No ones going to pay to change that in a time of cutbacks.
 

158756

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2014
Messages
1,628
Isn't it the notion that physical ticket offices may close but the staff will still be there to assist passengers, eg at ticket machines and barriers?
TVM and e-ticket options will also need to improve to offer a full range of ticket types.

Maybe at the larger stations, but the point is to save money, and the big cost is the staff. And removing staff entirely will quite naturally go hand in hand with more cost savings by closing waiting facilities, toilets etc, once there are no staff present.
 

ChewChewTrain

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2019
Messages
355
Maybe at the larger stations, but the point is to save money, and the big cost is the staff. And removing staff entirely will quite naturally go hand in hand with more cost savings by closing waiting facilities, toilets etc, once there are no staff present.
Replacing ticket windows with online/machine sales is one thing, as is replacing station toilets with an acceptable standard of on-train toilets. But there is no replacement for the humble waiting room. Even if unheated (which from experience already happens at some staffed stations), their presence makes a big difference IMO. People will complain once they’re gone, but of course it’ll probably be too late by then.

Their closure (in many cases after nigh-on 200 years of use) doesn’t seem much like progress to me. Does lighting and the inability to rent out the rooms really cost much relative to staff etc?
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,361
Location
Somerset
This is already common on my patch in most medium sized stations. Smaller stations often combine the role of cleaner, dispatcher and ticket office in to one job. I suspect the smaller ones that close the ticket office will also close the toilets and waiting rooms as then they can be unstaffed. As for assisting passengers, at our unstaffed stations it depends if there is a gaurd. On trains that are DOO there's no assistance, and with the age of the stations usually a gap and step. No ones going to pay to change that in a time of cutbacks.
Which is fine, as long as it is a requirement that serving the public comes before other duties like cleaning. Not that long ago I was left standing outside a closed ticket office for its first 20 minutes of opening “because I’ve got to clean the platforms by 7am” (and no, this wasn’t a case of short-staffing - but, apparently, standard practice)
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,851
Location
East Anglia
The rebuilt Gatwick Station won’t have a ticket office.

It will have lots of ticket machines and staff available to help out.

This is the future.
Reminds me of Birmingham International when Virgin remodelled the ticket office/waiting area many years ago.
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,562
Location
UK
Which is fine, as long as it is a requirement that serving the public comes before other duties like cleaning.

The serving public will never come first. The companies will always look to multi-skilling their staff and giving them other duties to fulfil. IF you have DEDICATED Customer service roles its different. Places like London Victoria which have dedicated customer service desks allow for passengers to come before other duties. When those roaming passenger hosts were there they got ignored and were generally considered to be quite incompetent, passengers didn't like them. They were also difficult to find (if you catch my drift)

Just moving Ticket Office staff from behind their window and onto the platform doesn't specifically help. What it needs is an introduction of more dedicated roles and using those ticket offices as information windows etc.
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
5,050
Which is fine, as long as it is a requirement that serving the public comes before other duties like cleaning. Not that long ago I was left standing outside a closed ticket office for its first 20 minutes of opening “because I’ve got to clean the platforms by 7am” (and no, this wasn’t a case of short-staffing - but, apparently, standard practice)
I agree. What is key is staff with a mindset of flexibility, based around what will best meet passengers' needs, not 'what's the processes I must do before I can think about passengers?'.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,851
Location
East Anglia
I agree. What is key is staff with a mindset of flexibility, based around what will best meet passengers' needs, not 'what's the processes I must do before I can think about passengers?'.
It’s striking the right balance between the two.
 
Joined
5 Sep 2020
Messages
177
Location
Berkshire
At the country end of SWR's Reading to Waterloo line, some ticket offices have had barcode ticket printers installed, and some haven't.
This may be an indicator of which offices are to stay open.
I believe that the situation is as follows.

Offices with barcode printers (ie which may stay open):
Wokingham
Bracknell
Egham
Staines

Offices without barcode printers (ie which may close):
Earley
Winnersh Triangle
Winnersh
Martins Heron
Ascot
Sunningdale
Virginia Water
 

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
2,985
Location
UK
I agree. What is key is staff with a mindset of flexibility, based around what will best meet passengers' needs, not 'what's the processes I must do before I can think about passengers?'.
Presumably in the sort of cases being talked about here, it's just poor process to blame - the solo staff member arrives at say 6am or thereabouts, opens the toilets etc and does their 'housekeeping' first, before the morning rush. Which makes sense, but of course the ticket office ought not to be open for the first half hour or so. What's the betting that in most cases the TOC wants it advertised as open from the moment the staff member turns up? Or, more pertinently, the office has it's mandated opening time and managent don't want to pay an extra half hour's wage beforehand, so the 'housekeeping' has to happen during opening hours?! It isn't the staff member being deliberately obtuse!
 

Scott1

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2015
Messages
385
Which is fine, as long as it is a requirement that serving the public comes before other duties like cleaning. Not that long ago I was left standing outside a closed ticket office for its first 20 minutes of opening “because I’ve got to clean the platforms by 7am” (and no, this wasn’t a case of short-staffing - but, apparently, standard practice)
I can't speak for other stations, but the DfT/some TOCs set daft time requirements for tasks to be complete by, which is all fine on paper, but in reality results in this kind of poor service.
I agree. What is key is staff with a mindset of flexibility, based around what will best meet passengers' needs, not 'what's the processes I must do before I can think about passengers?'.
Definitely, have a list of tasks to complete is fine, but the staff member needs to be trusted to do them when is appropriate on the day, especially since everyday is different. A good focus on why we are there primarily. I'm lucky that my TOC does seem to trust us to get on with things for the most part, but the DfT do spot check stations for compliance, which is when you end up with the wrong priorities sometimes IMO.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,361
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Recent experience shows the opposite.

Southern with OBS, keeping the customer facing element of the role

LO going DOO, and closing ticket offices, but putting many more people at stations.

The general increase of staffing at stations, through extra security people, gate lines staff, etc.

Related to this, and acknowledging that one man’s experience does not prove a theory, but in the last 6 months I have seen far more staff checking tickets / patrolling for security on board DOO trains (Thameslink) than on trains with conductors / TMs (LNWR/WMT). I’ve used the latter around 4 times a week in that time and seen a member of staff 3 times.

It is quite interesting that during mornings, my local station in the 1990s functioned with three members of staff - two in the booking office, and one supervisor in charge of the station. No gateline staff because there wasn’t one, though for a time there were “security” staff doing manual checks.

Fast forward to now, and there can often be multiple staff hanging around the gateline, and on top of this dispatch staff.

How much value to the average passenger journey this increase in staffing has added is open to debate, especially as ticket office staff nowadays are less knowledgeable (and to be fair the ticketing system is more complex now). On top of this has been a gradual reduction in what staff can do operationally, likewise their capability in being able to interpret disruption. Generally at my local station during disruption the gateline will be opened and all the staff disappear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top