• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

What's the latest on ECML additional services?

Status
Not open for further replies.

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,269
Location
Yorkshire
Anyone know what's happening on the ECML? Originally Class 90s and Mk3s were proposed, but now NXEC is proposing trains of half that length formed of 180s.

The DfT doesn't like 180s and won't tolerate them on the WCML, so surely they are going to object to them on the ECML?

The DfT objected very strongly about the prospect of 180s on the WCML "...a 5-car train is a very inefficient use of very limited capacity on the WCML" and more can be found here.

Obviously the DfT is powerless to prevent open access operator Hull Trains using valuable capacity in an efficient way by running very short trains on the ECML, but surely they can stop NXEC persuing this ludicrous policy?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

rail-britain

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2007
Messages
4,102
The Mark 3 coaches have already been chosen and inspected, conversion work should take place shortly; looks everything is proceeding as planned
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,269
Location
Yorkshire
The Mark 3 coaches have already been chosen and inspected, conversion work should take place shortly; looks everything is proceeding as planned

So common sense prevailed? :D

Whose being lumbered with the crappy 180s then? :lol:
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
3,401
Well the sensible thing would be to get them back to FGW to sort out the capacity issues in the Thames Valley. But DfT probably have other ideas.
 

rail-britain

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2007
Messages
4,102
Whose being lumbered with the crappy 180s then?
Quite a lot can happen in the next 18 months, the units can then go back to RoSCo and some other unfortunate TOC can be offered them
As far as I am aware they will eventually end up at NXEC
The Mark 3a and Mark 3b coaches are only a temporary solution
The Mark 3a coaches in storage now have excessive miles on them, so they are getting nothing more than a repaint and internal refurb to see them through for about 2 years
 

theblackwatch

Established Member
Joined
15 Feb 2006
Messages
10,889
The Mark 3a coaches in storage now have excessive miles on them, so they are getting nothing more than a repaint and internal refurb to see them through for about 2 years

If they have excessive mileage on them, they'll need more than that for 2 years service - most coaches in regular service have a C4 overhaul (as a minimum) every couple of years, never mind ones with 'excessive mileage'.
 

glynn80

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2008
Messages
1,666
The 180s still have the possibility of going to Hull Trains to allow the 222s they hold to transfer to EMT for the start of the Corby services (due to start in the December TT change but are being deferred until suitable stock can be found), I hear negotiations are under way with the DfT on acquisition of this stock, another wait and see...
 

djw1981

Established Member
Joined
10 Jul 2007
Messages
2,642
Location
Glasgow
The 180's made more sense IMO.

1. They were proposed for Lincoln and Harrogate (as an extension of York) services - both none electric lines, and both with lower demand than a cl90+8.
2. These services could travel at 125mph max speed (vice a cl90 at 110) and thus aids ease of pathing.
3. with HT their reliability seems better - thus a common maintenance depot at Crofton could lead to higher levels of reliability.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top