• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

What was the most important line to be closed?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

FQ

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
4 Oct 2013
Messages
6,645
Location
-
Daventry is probably the biggest town with no railway station so I will go for the Leamington to Daventry line.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,410
Location
Yorks
To move up to East Anglia, the Lowestoft to Yarmouth line was closed post-Beeching; I remember it running in the late 1960s. A problem with it was that it didn't connect at Yarmouth with the line from Norwich; it went to South Town, which had declined sadly after the direct line from Beccles was closed. The three terminal stations at Yarmouth were quite separate with only a very indirect connection between two of them, South Town and Beach, and the latter had closed by the 1960s.

Yeah, that's an interesting point.

It still seems surprising though, considering Great Yarmouth is quite a large town and many large towns happily support two stations, albeit perhaps with one of them stripped down a bit (think St Albans).

I think the date of closure has a lot to do with it. 1969 - 70 seems to have been a particularly bad time for closures when the railway really lost the plot. Think of all the most pointless, counter-productive closures took place in this period, many of them sorely missed. Not just Lowestoft - Yarmouth but Alton - Winchester, Skipton - Colne, Uckfield - Lewes, Wareham - Swanage, Penrith - Keswick.

I'm not sure how much the economic situation of the time was to blame, but the phrase directionless flailing springs to mind. I'd go so far as to say that if they'd stabilised the network in about 1968, even taking account of Beeching, we'd still be immeasurably better off today. Truly the nadir.
 

Leylandlad

Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
118
If I may return to this thread ;)

A few mentions of the Woodhead line, although that was covered by the Hope Valley line...Waverley Line local traffic to Hawick but duplicated as a through route by the WCML.

No single route has had peeps on here up in arms over its closure. None of us want to see lines closed obviously.

Bottom line is there really hasn't been a major irreplaceable main route closed, by Dicky Beeching or anyone else.

The rail network today is a great national asset. We can build it up with future reopenings. Future generations will not forgive us if we don't take the opportunity now to build HS2 :lol:
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,410
Location
Yorks
If I may return to this thread ;)

A few mentions of the Woodhead line, although that was covered by the Hope Valley line...Waverley Line local traffic to Hawick but duplicated as a through route by the WCML.

No single route has had peeps on here up in arms over its closure. None of us want to see lines closed obviously.

Bottom line is there really hasn't been a major irreplaceable main route closed, by Dicky Beeching or anyone else.

Quite a lot of us "peeps" didn't have the opportunity to be up in arms over the many irreplaceable routes closed.
 

Leylandlad

Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
118
Quite a lot of us "peeps" didn't have the opportunity to be up in arms over the many irreplaceable routes closed.

Funny you should say that Rob :D

The Waverley line closure and its impending rebirth always had a special place in my heart as it was the first line to be closed in my lifetime.

I was 5 days old when it closed...my mother said I was very restless that night they were rioting at Newcastleton :lol:
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,060
Location
St Albans
Without getting involved in the politics of the Beeching closures, there are many lines that were closed for the then popular reasons, (e.g. cost saving vs rapid increase in car travel). With the rapid development of Essex in the '70s and '80s with commuter villages, had they survived a few more years, they would have become key parts of commuter systems. Take the Essex lines like:

Bishops Stortford to Braintree, (already mentioned)
Witham to Maldon
Maldon to South Wooham Ferrers
Great Chesterford to Six Mile Bottom

Given that the Wickford to Southminster line survives today, some of the above lines would provide more valuable feeder routes into the WAML and GEML (in which case would have been upgraded by now rather than dragging-on as hopelessly overloaded with traffic from less stations).
In addition, some of the above lines provide good diversion routes in times of need.
 

Lankyline

Member
Joined
25 Jul 2013
Messages
477
Location
Lancashire
The one closure that should have never happened and wasn't part of Beeching was that of Blackpool Central. It was the local council that wanted the land to 'redevelop' the land into what turned out to be a huge car park. 4-6 platforms on the excurision side would have closed Blackpool North - Poulton and given up the main Central station by the front for Council use. The Blackpool South line runs through the greater population centres and not closing Central but North could have possibly saved the Fleetwood line (closed 1970) as that would have been the only service left for Poulton, therefore enhancing the economic viability of that line. Hourly Fleetwood - Colne trains anyone?

Beeching did recommend the closure of Blackpool north, but as you state the council petitioned for closure of Central. One point though is that Central's main traffic was seasonal and this declined with increased car & coach traffic. It's also interesting to note that for those that don't know part of the M55 and Yeadon way, that continues from the end of the m/way runs along the old trackbed.

On a different point, why does Colne - Skipton keep getting mentioned on here as a "major" route closure, I thought this was just a provincial link ?

I would submit Penrith - Keswick - Workington line as an unnecessary closure & also as previously mentioned Preston - Southport
 

Dr_Paul

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
1,546
With the rapid development of Essex in the '70s and '80s with commuter villages, had they survived a few more years, they would have become key parts of commuter systems. Take the Essex lines like: Great Chesterford to Six Mile Bottom.

I think that this line would have needed to have survived more than 'a few more years'. It closed in the 1850s, although the track-bed is still visible in places.

I think that had the Buntingford branch lasted a few more years, it could well have become a commuter route.

One of the more stupid things was to close the line through Haverhill about the same time that it was developed as a new town, although in mitigation it didn't have a direct route to London via the Cambridge line, as the junction at Bartlow went the wrong way.
 

Met5141

Member
Joined
5 Mar 2015
Messages
6
Location
Derbyshire
I think that had the Buntingford branch lasted a few more years, it could well have become a commuter route.

Further to that, if they hadn't terminated the line at Buntingford during construction in the 1860's and had continued as originally planned to connect to the Great Northern at Royston, i feel that line would be here today, electrified and providing a useful diversionary route.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
15 Sep 2008
Messages
105
Location
Royston, Herts
Further to that, if they hadn't terminated the line at Buntingford during construction in the 1860's and had continued as originally planned to connect to the Great Northern at Royston, i feel that line would be here today, electrified and providing a useful diversionary route.

Has anyone got any ideas to which route it would have followed from Buntingford to Royston
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top