I also find the articles in Today's Railways interesting. Recently, there has been too much of a focus on politics in RAIL in my opinion. TR has become the sort of general interest magazine that RAIL was in the late 1990's and early 2000's.
I lost a lot of interest in Modern Railways when they became too technical and industry focused in the late 1990's. Losing Barry Doe didn't help them either!
I agree that RAIL is far too Political. I begin to wonder if that is why Pip Dunn left to form Railways Illustrated?
but it does remain very good on technical issues thanks to Roger Ford.
I buy Rail Express every issue. I used to buy RAIL but stopped when it became political.[/QUOTE
Still buy RAIL, couud'nt be botherered whether is PC or not. Not that were are going to change it !
I skim through the RMT mag that's about it![]()
Is there anything in the RMT mag about trains?!?! Buses, Ferries and Cuban cross dressers on most page.![]()
I admit though that RAIL is too centred around the facts and figures, and yes the HS2 propaganda machine needs a break. On he subject of Barry Doe, whilst I don't question his knowledge of tickets and timetables, I have noted the odd questionable comment every now and then, of particular note some time back was his view that knowing about tickets was "the sole job" of Guards, which I thought was a pretty shoddy piece of misinformation for a major rail mag :roll:
Hi Greenback. I purchased my first Modern Railways magazine back in 1963, though I think it had a different name at the time then changed to Modern Railways, I may be getting that mixed up after all these years. I meant to mention Roger Ford he did great work during the years of the changeover to Diesel and electric and kept everyone up to date with the technical side of things. Glad to hear that heh is still going strong.
Throughout the 60's the magazine covered all the railway closures and agruments for and against. The photography in the magazine was excellent and of course there were still many, many different types of locomotive and trains to be seen everywhere as well as the railway sites that were soon to be gone. It is well worth searching for issues back in those times as it really shows how little railway we have left today. Not only that but just how well-kept the lineside was, no forest of trees and bushes making you feel that you are in permanant tunnel everywhere, or branches scraping trains as they passed.
There was also another regular columnist, who's name I forget at the moment but who was very well respected because he actually used the railway on a daily basis and told things how they were and even BR used to pay heed to him. Sorry I can't recall his name at the moment but perhaps you can help.
Traction? agree with the 'gone down hill' recently bit totally:cry:I buy The Railway Magazine and Traction ( although that has gone down hill recently imo and i may stop buying it) and i read the Railway Herald on line
I read at work: Rail News, Rial Staff, Railway Technology, Rail Engineering, our internal mag, basically anything i can get my hands on that might expand my knoweldge of the Railway.