backontrack
Established Member
If you don't support Beeching's ideas or believe that only totally urban areas should see rail transport investment, then that doesn't make you 'deluded', a 'fantasist', a 'crayonista' or anything of the sort.
People who are not railway enthusiasts should not be surprised when railway enthusiasts post on a railway discussion forum.
People are too busy to acquit Beeching for his hand in the Reshaping Report when he genuinely supported the mass closures (and wanted even more of them to close). He wasn't sure of how much he could realistically get closed, but - had he had his way - we would have seen even more lines shut.
If you want to improve the environment, improve social mobility, giving young people access to jobs, stick in some buzzwords about Social Justice, provide accountable public transport etc (like Corbynistas tell us they want) then you'd be better nationalising buses than the Dear Leader's obsession with nationalising trains.
People who are railway enthusiasts should not be surprised when railway non-enthusiasts post on a railway discussion forum
1. Buses AND trains should be nationalised under regional companies, or at the very least provided via franchises closely specified by a nationwide network of PTEs (with apprppriate provision for national and cross-boundary services), to provide an integrated transport system which will get as many people as possible out of their cars.
2. Getting as many people as possible out of their cars, rather than providing a large, guaranteed subsidy from the British taxpayer to a collection of private transport companies and state-owned railways from overseas, should ve the main function of our public transport network.
External door open buttons should be wired up to the power unit line, energised to 750V DC, until a door release is put up.
That will ensure:
1. Impatient door “woodpeckers” will get a big “shock”, that the doors don’t open until the BIL lights come on;
2. Those who are impatient will only get to be impatient once.
Although I agree with the spirit of the post, could you translate what the bolded bit is please?
It is mentioned in the forum rules not to use abbreviations without first saying what they mean.
Although I agree with the spirit of the post, could you translate what the bolded bit is please?
It is mentioned in the forum rules not to use abbreviations without first saying what they mean.
Actually that was the first time seeing that for me too. It would be good to have a jargon list somewhere that lists all acronyms, slang and abbreviations.Apologies, BIL = Bodyside Indicator Lights.
Although, where does it end? I assume that everyone participating in these forums is reasonably au fait with railway vernacular.
4. Journeys longer than 2 hours or 150 miles have compulsory restaurant/catering supplied and not bloody trolleys.
Modular signalling equipment should all be scrapped and proper solid equipment and relays should be reinstated.
Anybody who pushes on the train before passengers have left should be removed off and made to wait for the last train of the day.
I'll state upfront that I have no expertise in railway signalling equipment, and I am in no way criticising your viewpoint, but I am curious why you have this opinion.
Ban the Metro newspaper. It creates so much litter.
Agreed. In a similar way, don't mock people because they disagree with you. It doesn't help your argument in the slightest.Saying that Beeching was right does not make you an edgy iconoclast. It suggests instead that you are someone who is incapable of learning from past mistakes