• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

What happened to progress?

Status
Not open for further replies.

talltim

Established Member
Joined
17 Jan 2010
Messages
2,454
Supersonic air travel was an evolutionary dead end. Air travel has still made huge progress since pre Concorde days, just in the direction of increased capacity and reduced cost.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

table38

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
1,812
Location
Stalybridge
Supersonic air travel was an evolutionary dead end. Air travel has still made huge progress since pre Concorde days, just in the direction of increased capacity and reduced cost.

And much quieter which means airports can stay open longer at night, not a bad achivement for the manufacturers as you have to make the plane 10 times quieter just to reduce the noise by 1db

The Emirates A380 goes over my house about noon most days and I hardly notice! In fact the guys cutting the grass this morning are making more noise :)
 
Joined
9 Apr 2011
Messages
317
Location
Over there
The 1960s was a decade of rapid scientific progress, probably because lots of weapons research was carried out during WW2 and the early 50s after the nuclear devices were exploded over Japan, and the technology suddenly spread outwards into civilian life.

The OP is right in many respects, progress has stalled. Just think of the Wright brothers first powered flight in 1903, and 66 years later man had walked on the moon.

A similar period of time elapsed between City Of Truro and the bullet train.

Why no equivalent progress in the last 40 years? I think mainly because rich philanthropists have become a very rare species; the wealthy prefer to make even more money for themselves, and governments have poured billions of taxpayers' cash into ever more complex military hardware to fight ever more unwinnable wars.

Instead of which, they should have been putting all their efforts into finding a cheap and easy way of escaping from the Earth's gravitational forces.

I realise that the purists will be horrified, but I would pile a whole shed load of the nastiest bacteria we can find and send it on a rocket programmed to land it on Mars. Then just wait and see if anything happens.

After all, there do not seem to be any other intelligent life forms in our Solar System, so we might as well experiment with the nearby planets and see if we can encourage some form of colonisation as quickly as possible. We cant do a much worse job on Mars and Venus than nature seems to have managed already.

I do not subscribe to the view that we should sort our own world out before messing up another one, because we learn more from making mistakes than just faffing around trying to look clever.
 

BlythPower

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2009
Messages
864
Location
Kenilworth
We are 'progressing' in many ways. Rather than being 'expansive' (i.e. into space), it's into a 'smaller' direction with things like genetics and mobile devices. The processing power of a smart phone would have needed a computer the size of a house just 20 or 40 years ago. Similarly, the interfaces we use nowadays would have been unthinkable then.
 

thefab444

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2006
Messages
3,688
Location
The New Forest
Its funny how some people think your an idiot if you have an opinion that does not match theirs. I call that being an individual.

People think you are an idiot when you state your opinion something and then refuse to explain your reasoning behind that opinion. It makes you look as if you know your argument won't hold water, and/or is based on less than sound reasoning.
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
The 1960s was a decade of rapid scientific progress, probably because lots of weapons research was carried out during WW2 and the early 50s after the nuclear devices were exploded over Japan, and the technology suddenly spread outwards into civilian life.

The OP is right in many respects, progress has stalled. Just think of the Wright brothers first powered flight in 1903, and 66 years later man had walked on the moon.

A similar period of time elapsed between City Of Truro and the bullet train.

Why no equivalent progress in the last 40 years? I think mainly because rich philanthropists have become a very rare species; the wealthy prefer to make even more money for themselves, and governments have poured billions of taxpayers' cash into ever more complex military hardware to fight ever more unwinnable wars.

It's also become more expensive to innovate and the short term nature of Western politics precludes any real long term investment. The culture is "we want it and we want it now" where it is something with tangible benefits.
 

SteveP29

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2011
Messages
1,181
Location
Edinburgh/ Chester le Street
Its funny how some people think your an idiot if you have an opinion that does not match theirs. I call that being an individual.

That's because it's easier to go with the flock, with the sheep as it were, rather than research, think about and formulate your own opinion on why things happen or what you believe in.

You see it all over, newspapers tell you what they want you to hear and know, tv broadcasters also do the same, S***n C****l and the record companies tell you what music you like, want and need to listen to, rather than looking for and finding something you like yourself.

Then again, why should anyone put themselves out to find these things out when they can let others do it for them. Thank god there are people out there who are prepared to put the effort in, or else it'd be a bloody boring world!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top