• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

What did my £32k go on?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,243
Location
UK
I wonder what the news of the world has to say about this....
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,374
Location
Yorks
This is an over simplification. It was the availability of credit, particularly sub-prime like Northern Rock, that pushed prices up as buyers could offer more.

I thought that Northern Rocks problems were mainly due to it relying on the credit markets too much and not having enough deposits to fund its own business model rather than sub-prime lending as such.
 

BlythPower

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2009
Messages
864
Location
Kenilworth
So, what does everyone imagine has happened to the deficit in the 14 months or so since the Coalition took command? Have they been manfully wrestling with the monstrous beast of public spending? Attached is a graph from the Office for National Statistics (a bit of government, so no newspaper-style bias). Interestingly, it shows that it only really took off in spring 2008 when the banks imploded under the weight of their own greed and the economy had to be stablised. Even more interestingly, public sector borrowing has continued to increase under the Coalition. Surprsingly, the national debt has also increased! Could it be that the deficit wasn't as important to the Tories (or to the wider national economy) as they made out pre-election? Surely they haven't over-inflated its significance to get away with making massive public sector cuts for purely idealogical reasons?
 

Attachments

  • 206.gif
    206.gif
    4.3 KB · Views: 7

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,451
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Sub-prime lending was the factor that happened to be on the surface at the time, it was the pinprick that burst the bubble and easy talk for the (generally speaking) quite thick public. The issues behind it are far more complicated, far more in depth and stem back quite a way.

The sub-prime lending in itself was not the sole factor, as this was specific to the United States of America in its remit.

What was the main factor, was the packaging into financial high-risk inter-financial items including sub-prime mortgages by the large American financial and banking firms, who then spread these packages world-wide amongst the banking communities of all areas. This is why when the sub-prime "bubble" actually burst, the affects were felt on a world-wide basis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top