danielcanning
On Moderation
Everyday there are disruptions to services due to ‘overhead line problems’ why is this? Is our infrastructure so poor that a slight gust of wind can blow down miles of wiring? What is going on here?
Every day?Everyday there are disruptions to services due to ‘overhead line problems’
It's not the same on every route. The ECML (East Coast Main Line) has the highest number of problems presumably due to some factor of design and/or location of its overhead wires; if you discounted the ECML the number of incidents would be considerably lower.
And the WCML today, my wife’s train was a mere 101 minutes late arriving in Manchester today for her meeting, which her clients were obviously delighted about!As it happens, the London end of the ECML seems to have gone down just now.
Surely (!) there must be failure analysis done that feeds into programmes of maintenance/renewal and improved design for the future.While there are weather-related issues (mainly high winds and associated flying debris), most of the problems seem to be wear and tear related.
Neutral sections seem particularly prone to dewirements.
Dewirements may be also due to faulty rolling stock rather than faulty OHLE - it's not always the infrastructure at fault.
Increased high-speed traffic also plays a part, some lines are carrying up to double the number of electric trains that BR operated, and at higher speeds.
The WCML is also a much faster railway than it was under BR (125mph v 110mph).
The GWML supposedly has more resilient OHLE - this week's major dewirement was in the older 1990s wiring.
The MML will be another line with a mix of older BR wiring south of Bedford, and new designs north of there.
Which is believed to be caused by an object from an over bridge coming in to contact with the OHL and parting the catenary wires on the Down Slow.As it happens, the London end of the ECML seems to have gone down just now.
There is, hence new designs being more robust (compare GWML East/West of Airport Junction) and programmes like the Headspan-to-Boom replacement on the ECML.Surely (!) there must be failure analysis done that feeds into programmes of maintenance/renewal and improved design for the future.
Delays and disruption are a pain of course, but not totally avoidable, esp at reasonable cost.
Everyday there are disruptions to services due to ‘overhead line problems’ why is this? Is our infrastructure so poor that a slight gust of wind can blow down miles of wiring? What is going on here?
Hyperbole much?Every day?
Anybody have the stats to settle the point? @Bald Rick?Hyperbole much?
Anybody have the stats to settle the point? @Bald Rick?
How very diplomatic of you!This week is not a good one to try and win that argument, even if the facts support it.
however todays fun and games at Stevenage are, at least, not caused by an OLE fault (nor a train fault).
How very diplomatic of you!
Indeed and despite the current poor industrial relations it does show that deep down the railway family DNA is alive and fully functioning which makes it such a shame that management and DfT don't realise how much goodwill is worth keeping cultivated to deliver for passengers when the chips are down and ultimately ensuring the revenue continues to flow.Well yesterday was not a good one for the Western; it took the shine off an otherwise great few days for the railway and some exceptionally hard work by many, many people behind the scenes.
which makes it such a shame that management and DfT don't realise how much goodwill is worth
Back on topic well sought of you rarely here about displaced conductor rails causing delays!!
What do they get reported as?it is an oddity that all the problems with the DC rarely get reported, even the very disruptive incidents like we had the a week or so ago.
Conductor Rail is pretty robust and the shoegear is designed to part company with the shoebeam if too much force is imposed on it but that can you leave you with a stranded train if you wipe off all the shoegear down the side of the train that con rail is predominantly located over a section of route. The other beauty of con rail is if it is displaced its generally a matter of replacing damaged pots and getting plenty of muscle out there with bars and just dropping it back into the pots so doesn't have all the challenges of registration that OLE does so rectification much quicker. Of course that counts for nothing in todays elf & safety world.What do they get reported as?
"Overhead line problems" is clearly not unusual, been caught out by that before (including at Exeter St Davids)... but even when I lived in South London, I don't remember a specific delay reason relating to the third rail
But you do get demands for replacement with OLE after a couple of days of heavy rain or snow disrupting services.Back on topic well sought of you rarely here about displaced conductor rails causing delays!!
I don't remember a specific delay reason relating to the third rail
Yes. Both systems have advantages and disadvantages; neither is more perfect than the other, overall.But you do get demands for replacement with OLE after a couple of days of heavy rain or snow disrupting services.
What do they get reported as?
"Overhead line problems" is clearly not unusual, been caught out by that before (including at Exeter St Davids)... but even when I lived in South London, I don't remember a specific delay reason relating to the third rail
Fortunately thats all it is a couple of days every few years if that but it is its weakest pointBut you do get demands for replacement with OLE after a couple of days of heavy rain or snow disrupting services.
Fortunately thats all it is a couple of days every few years if that but it is its weakest point
Is there any research being undertaken to find more resilient ways to power 25kV ac electric trains, rather than picking up the electricity via a bit of metalwork attached to the vehicle's roof, which physically rubs against a piece of wire strung over the track?
GWML west of airport junction is extremely robust. Problem is people then say it is ugly and functional rather than aesthetic.Is there any research being undertaken to find more resilient ways to power 25kV ac electric trains, rather than picking up the electricity via a bit of metalwork attached to the vehicle's roof, which physically rubs against a piece of wire strung over the track?
Inductive charging exists, you may even be using a device capable of it at this moment.I'm intrigued to know how you expect Network Rail to bend the basic properties of electromagnetic energy to somehow to get away from conductor to conductor contact in an electrical circuit. Short of plasma based OHL and pantographs I think its a pretty insurmountable issue.