• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

West Midlands First Class. Any experience?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Morpethcurve

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2012
Messages
169
Travelling London - Birmingham and back in April, WMT 1st Class is good value although I realise it takes longer.

Is it proper First i.e. three abreast and more space, or would I just be paying for a headrest cover like on Southern?

Your comments would be appreciated. Many Thanks - Morpethcurve
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Lrd

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2010
Messages
3,018
It's 2+2 mostly airline with 2(?) tables of 4. The seats aren't as comfortable as the standard class seats on the 350/1s and /3s but are better than the 3+2 seating on the /2s.

You're paying to guarantee yourself a seat but depending on the service you get then it will be empty by Milton Keynes/Northampton with a few more doing local journeys from Coventry/International into New Street.

I would look at Chiltern, takes a little bit longer than Virgin but are comfy trains, especially the loco hauled sets.
 

Clansman

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2016
Messages
2,649
Location
Scotland and Hong Kong
Travelling London - Birmingham and back in April, WMT 1st Class is good value although I realise it takes longer.

Is it proper First i.e. three abreast and more space, or would I just be paying for a headrest cover like on Southern?

Your comments would be appreciated. Many Thanks - Morpethcurve
Depends what you're after. On a 3+2 layout train it is an improvement, but on the general 2+2 layout it's nothing special. It purely depends on the type of seating which suits you.

It's by no means proper, but rather a premium hyped standard offering. For example, different style seats in 2+2 layout, larger largroom, curtains, an amticaster, and two plug sockets, is what you're getting for your money. I've travelled in it a few times from Tamworth to Crewe and have no complaints. I'm not sure how the first class fares compare against standard so I'm not how WMT value the 'upgrade'.

Although the seats are said to recline, I've failed to do so!
 
Last edited:

class387

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2015
Messages
1,580
I must emphasise the fact that if your train is a 350/1 or 350/3, as many Birmingham trains are, the first class seats are in fact worse, than the seats used in standard!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,231
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The 1st seats are the same as used in Standard (and 1st) on the 2+2 seated Southern and Southeastern Electrostars. They are OKish, but are a slightly odd design with very high armrests and very thick support pillars, which to make makes for a less comfortable seat than the Grammer E3000s found in Standard (on /1, /3 and /4), and noticeably less legroom than all the Standard seats except the airline side centre section which has an extra row crammed in. Personally I don't even bother going sitting there even if it is declassified unless there is no other seat.
 

47271

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2015
Messages
2,983
Also to say that, unless recently refurbished, the cabin is very likely to be threadbare to the extent that you won't be able to tell the original colour of the seats. I was on a particularly horrid example between London and Milton Keynes the other day.

Watch for the trains that sit at Northampton for 20 minutes, that's another reason not to do this.

I travel between London and Birmingham a fair bit, if you want value for money go on the single class Chiltern. If money is no object and you're in a hurry use Virgin. If you take the attitude that everything in life has to be tried once, go First Class on a crusty 350.
 

Morpethcurve

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2012
Messages
169
I appreciate the advice. I am thinking of going down on a loco-hauled Chiltern and back up on a £27.00 Virgin upgrade, on a 390.

Thanks - Morpethcurve.
 

boxy321

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2016
Messages
449
I appreciate the advice. I am thinking of going down on a loco-hauled Chiltern and back up on a £27.00 Virgin upgrade, on a 390.

Thanks - Morpethcurve.
Sounds good. I was on both this morning: VT to Brum then Chiltern to Solihull. I really should go to London on the latter one day.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
18,134
There are two reasons for using 1st class on WMT:

1. Guarantee of a seat
2. Better ambiance away from the chavs and riff-raff (most of the time)
 

Mordac

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2016
Messages
2,386
Location
Birmingham
On 350/1s, the seats are worse in first than standard. They're the only train seats that ever caused me pain.
 

capoldi

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2017
Messages
9
There are two reasons for using 1st class on WMT:

1. Guarantee of a seat
2. Better ambiance away from the chavs and riff-raff (most of the time)

A couple of mentions of a 'guaranteed seat' here...of course not the case, and frequently the opposite - on at least 4 of the departures I regularly use 1st is standing room only, with standard having loads of space.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top