snowfall, not snowball.
this http://www.snowfall.se/
A slight sideways deviation - Have National Express now totally abandoned the idea of bidding for railway franchises now?
I can remember when they were the leading bus company that had a lot of rail franchises around the late 1990s/early noughties, with them being a mix of former Intercity (Midland Mainline), Regional Railways (Central, Valley Lines), and Network SouthEast (London, Tilbury, & Southend Railway) services.
I am aware that National Express have recently dispensed with their sole remaining UK franchise - the London, Tilbury, & Southend Railway.
Had NX still retained ownership of the LTS franchise, might they have tried one of the three franchises south of the Thames? Hypothetical I know, as I do not recall them being interested in railway operations south of the Thames.
Had NX still retained ownership of the LTS franchise, might they have tried one of the three franchises south of the Thames? Hypothetical I know, as I do not recall them being interested in railway operations south of the Thames.
Beacon Rail has announced its bought the 220/221 fleet off Lloyds Bank/Bank of Scotland. This covers 352 vehicles in 78 sets. Bold move for stock rapidly approaching 20 year old.
Interesting! Off topic - but does anyone know what the future holds for the Virgin 221/390 stock after they are displaced from WCML services after the introduction of HS2?
Scrap? They'll be well over 30 years old by then, and they have had a hard life so far.
True - although they are miles better than some of the stock we have up north, is it possible for them to be shortened and used as shorter distance stock (after a good refurb of the interior of course!). On another note - will WCML services be affected much during the construction of HS2 or will the service remain similar to the current service?
True - although they are miles better than some of the stock we have up north, is it possible for them to be shortened and used as shorter distance stock (after a good refurb of the interior of course!). On another note - will WCML services be affected much during the construction of HS2 or will the service remain similar to the current service?
I don't think shortening them would be a good idea, they don't have a good seat:length ratio.
Whats the rush to get rid of the Pendo's? Apart from the toilet issue and the fact they have small windows they are well looked after by Alstom and are reliable as any other EMU.
Technically excellent - interior ambience not very good. Need an internal seating reconfiguration - you have even in 1st class , seats with a view of a bulkhead and luggage racks which have a window view ! - the underused - or unused 1st class service point could yield a few more seats. Standard could do with more groupings around tables IMHO. Better legroom.
Scrap? They'll be well over 30 years old by then, and they have had a hard life so far.
In 2026 they will be 20-25 years old and have at least 10 years service left. The WCML/HS2 franchise will have 54 classic compatible sets which will make most of the Pendalinos and half the Voyagers redundant (assuming they are only needed for London-Chester/Holyhead. TPE Manchester Airport - Scotland services would be faster with Pendalinos than 397s because of tilting. It is entirely possible Manchester-Leeds will be wired by 2026 meaning plenty of alternative uses for the 397s. Spare Voyagers will likely be snapped up by CrossCountry or Chilterns to replace HSTs.
Didn't think Chiltern had HST's. Only DMU's and class 67/68 loco's
Oops yes your right. My point still stands though. The Voyagers will be appealing to ToCs and about 10 will be surpless to requirements in 2026.
TPE Manchester Airport - Scotland services would be faster with Pendalinos than 397s because of tilting.
What is the longest Pendalino set that can be accommodated in the platforms at Manchester Airport?
Would be nice if they did, but they'd just get stuck behind stoppers!
They are all 196-201m, so 8x23m max.
There's some inescapable logic about the use of non-tilt classic-compatible stock for HS2.
Converting the 2tph Euston-Scotland to CC stock (via HS2) means there is no point in utilising tilt north of Crewe.
So all services will become non-tilt, except anything running to Euston via Rugby.
Any other opinions?