• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

were is it now??

Status
Not open for further replies.
doubleamber

doubleamber

Member
Joined
6 Oct 2011
Messages
118
Location
lincolnshire
First post so be gentle.......

Just wondering if anyone knows were 89001 ended up? only had a few turns behind it and even jumped off one of the pennie 47s for it!!

Any news were it is?

DA.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

F

First class

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2008
Messages
2,731
AC Loco Group. Not registered for mainline use IRRC.

Possibly at Barrow Hill.
 
A

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,079
Location
Redcar
It's owned by the AC Locomotive Group and I believe it's based at Barrow Hill undergoing restoration. I'm not sure if that's with a view to mainline running or just to preserve it for the future.

First class said:
Not registered for mainline use IRRC.
Click to expand...

Not much point in having it mainline registered as it doesn't work! One of the traction motors is toast I seem to recall.
 
BestWestern

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
ole man said:
Got to be the ugliest locomotive ever built, and i mean EVER
Click to expand...

Nooo, that would be a GE Class 70, silly....!! :D

Actually I must say I rather like the 89, particularly when she was in GNER blue. It is certainly subjective on the style front tho.
 
heenan73

heenan73

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2011
Messages
68
Location
Canterbury, UK
ole man said:
Got to be the ugliest locomotive ever built, and i mean EVER
Click to expand...

You might be an ole man, but clearly too young to remember the coffee pot - so ugly, they had to scrap them - so ugly, in fact, that they were beautiful. They used to wander through Berkshire like sacks of potatoes

*I'm not talking about the 0-4-0 thing, though that's hardly beautiful, but the 0-6-0 Bulleid Q1
 
ole man

ole man

Member
Joined
6 Jul 2011
Messages
739
Location
LEC5
heenan73 said:
You might be an ole man, but clearly too young to remember the coffee pot - so ugly, they had to scrap them - so ugly, in fact, that they were beautiful. They used to wander through Berkshire like sacks of potatoes

*I'm not talking about the 0-4-0 thing, though that's hardly beautiful, but the 0-6-0 Bulleid Q1
Click to expand...
Got any picture's of this ugly coffee pot?.
Will bet you nothing can be as ugly as 89001, im not that young, though admit never seen 89001 in action, was it good?.
 
MK Tom

MK Tom

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
2,457
Location
Milton Keynes
Geezertronic said:
If the Wikipedia picture and links are anything to go by, it looks like a poor mans Class 90 doesn't it?
Click to expand...

Almost the other way round really, it's faster and has two extra axles...

89001 came frighteningly close to being scrapped but the ACLG mounted a fantastic camaign to raise the money to save it at the last minute. They have to be one of the most dedicated and commendable loco preservation groups I know of.
 
Barrett M95

Barrett M95

Member
Joined
7 Jul 2011
Messages
223
Schnellzug said:
This beast:
Click to expand...

That is so ugly that it's beautiful. It looks like it's not been finished. Must have been a wartime design?

Anyway - class 89 - I agree with ole man. It is the ugliest thing I ever saw on rails, including the Q1 and class 70.
 
heenan73

heenan73

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2011
Messages
68
Location
Canterbury, UK
Barrett M95 said:
That is so ugly that it's beautiful. It looks like it's not been finished. Must have been a wartime design?
Click to expand...

Correct - it was 'no frills' before Stelios was born. the most powerful 0-6-0 steamer ever in the UK, and survived in all its ugliness until 1966 (and there's still one at York, unless they've lost it). Great loco!

MUCH uglier than Avocet, which looks quite good when it's moving. Which has always been a rare occurrence.
 
Peter Mugridge

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,808
Location
Epsom
I quite like the "Anteater" but I do think it would look a lot better if they had built it with HST style horizontal headlight clusters instead of the experimental vertical ones.
 
scoope

scoope

Member
Joined
20 Sep 2011
Messages
127
Location
Cumbria (originaly Bolton)
Agree that ACLG are very proactive in the preservation of locos. 89001 "Avocet" was built as a prototype by BREL in the hope that an order for a class full of them could be built.......................the order never came. Even a bus company bought it at one point. We all remember ugly locos and become fond of them in later years, I doubt that will be the case with 89001
 
sprinterguy

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,567
Location
Macclesfield
As with some other posters, I must protest against some opinions that the class 89 is "ugly": I think it is a better looking loco than the class 90, and it is certainly more capable in terms of haulage capacity and maximum speed than a 90.

If the specification for the ECML hadn't been changed in the eighties then we would probably have seen a fleet of 89s working for East Coast, which would have displayed better adhesion characteristics than the 91s given that the 140mph capability of those locos was never taken advantage of. Even if the Co-co bogies would have bashed the hell out of the track...
 
Boothby97

Boothby97

Established Member
Joined
24 Apr 2011
Messages
1,753
Location
Cleethorpes
Why are you some of you picking on the avocet, she is a beauty, much more better looking than a 70, I believe that I saw her in action, don't think I every traveled behind her.
Thanks, Sam
 
Juniper Driver

Juniper Driver

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Messages
2,154
Location
SWR Metals
89001_BHL_20070714.JPG



Don't think it is ugly.

Wasn't it called badger also?

Did see it once (at Euston),didn't get a pic.:-x
 
sprinterguy

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,567
Location
Macclesfield
Juniper Driver said:
Wasn't it called badger also?

Did see it once (at Euston),didn't get a pic.:-x
Click to expand...
Indeed, it was also known as the "Flying Badger".

Shame you didn't get a picture of it at Euston, as surely that was quite a rare occurence (I know that it was tested on the WCML before the wires had been put up over the ECML) because, as I remember, weren't the Co-co bogies were out of gauge for Euston station?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top