• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Wagon Couplings

Status
Not open for further replies.

Doomotron

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,423
Location
Kent
I know that there are plenty of wagons using buckeye (or similar couplings) and there are others that still use hook and chain connections. What I don't know is what the proportion between them is. I'd assume most wagons use buckeyes now (not knowing much about freight in the UK) but I don't know that for sure.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,250
I know that there are plenty of wagons using buckeye (or similar couplings) and there are others that still use hook and chain connections. What I don't know is what the proportion between them is. I'd assume most wagons use buckeyes now (not knowing much about freight in the UK) but I don't know that for sure.
It will probably be about 97-98% screwlink and the remainder buckeye at the moment. One of the main users of buckeye was EWS/DBC for their newer coal wagons which are now gathering rust.
 

Irascible

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2020
Messages
2,233
Location
Dyfneint
I know that there are plenty of wagons using buckeye (or similar couplings) and there are others that still use hook and chain connections. What I don't know is what the proportion between them is. I'd assume most wagons use buckeyes now (not knowing much about freight in the UK) but I don't know that for sure.
There is a difference between 3-link, which is the traditional "hook & chain" & is loose-coupled - ie buffers don't touch unless the engine is braking - and screw-link which is what modern stuff uses; with screw-link you literally screw the wagons together to add some tension, so it's not quite as bad as it seems.

Anything still around using Instanter couplings?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top