Gareth Marston
Established Member
According to Wales Online today the WAG Express contract has been rolled over for another 12 months.
According to Wales Online today the WAG Express contract has been rolled over for another 12 months.
There should really be a WAG-RoSCo. After 3 years and almost £6m there are no assets to show for all the "investment" in operating the service.
Take a ten-year view and they'll be spending around £25M to operate the service. With that budget, could have had 2 brand new Inter-City style 7-car DMU/DEMU with full catering kitchen/restaurant and still have enough funds to pay for the operating costs.
Artificial splitting of money into "capital" and "revenue" headings within public spend accounts for this. The moneys come from the revenue pot hence cant actually own anything tangible.
He [...] also touched on the Cambrian, but would not be drawn on the hourly service, he mentioned WAG are looking into a P&Rfor their 600 odd Aber staff,however as it turns out less than 10% would use the train when asked.
Ah. The WAG. They like spending public money on luxuries. Margaret Moran should see if she can become part of the WAG...
Do you mean Aber? Or do you mean one of the many places that begins Aber?...for their 600 odd Aber staff...
Do you mean Aber? Or do you mean one of the many places that begins Aber?How are we meant to tell which one you mean? By looking at the rest of your post, I can figure out you are referring to Aberystwyth. Yes, I know people local to Aberystwyth understandably shorten their place name, but so do other places, and this could get confusing. Aber is actually closer to the route of the train in question than Aberystwyth, and also the train goes through places like Abergavenny, so when someone mentions "Aber" when talking about this service I would think perhaps they mean Abergavenny, I wouldn't think they meant a place nowhere near the route in question.
Anyhow back to the point Looks like WAG may well have coughed up £2M for the next 12 months Wagexpress,last year it was £1.7M of taxpayers money.
M
That works out at £7700 per day to run the service, what a joke.
Hardly surprising given that I would expect many of them will be commuting from places where there aren't railway stations! Surely WAG don't expect their entire workforce to live in Borth?
in Machynlleth its not unknown for the car park to be full by 0800 before the 0810 commuter train.
There's a lot of stations in the UK where all (free) parking is taken by 08.00 though
Does this mean the plans for WAG2 have been shelved?
Why does the WAG cost so much to run? I thought ATW own the mark 2s so they only need to pay for hire of the 57.
Dont they have to pay track acess charges and also a shunter if they need to run the locomotive round the train?
Say bye bye to your double tracking then if the WAG bin it....
, BTW subsidy is now £2M up from £1.7last yearIt is a huge barrier in rural areas such as Ceredigion and Gwynedd where population density is not high, and a railhead attracts people from surrounding areas who will normally need to travel in by car. (I'm lucky, I only live five minutes from my station, and there doesn't seem to be a shortage of parking there either).
Where have you been planner, WAG have confirmed the funding last month after extensive lobbying. The question now is,why is Net Rail ten months behind with grip 3 costings,someone on maternity leave.
Thats an incredibly petty comment to make about NR, the WAG are far from squeaky clean in this one. Look it at this way, as you know, all of this scheme is built on the fact the WAG want their glorified taxi to run via Wrexham and not the great un-washed of Crewe. If Gezza wasnt running the scheme wouldnt have even been dreamt up. The situation has been the same for decades so why hasnt someone done something about it before ??. If Gezza goes to the great train path in the sky, whats the point of doing it ?? The next problem is that if it does get built and Gezza is no longer there, who pays for it ?? will the WAG be chucking NR a few bob to maintain it ??