• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Virtual coupling

Status
Not open for further replies.

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Trials conducted in Naples on Trenitalia high speed trains by the German Aerospace Research Center of wireless rather than physical coupling of units to form trains. Idea is that a formation could be formed ad hoc to maximise available paths over a line section while minimising the unreliability issue of coupling wires. Works a lot like driverless cars, the driver in the lead unit drives the train and the units that form the train automatically travel safe braking distance apart according to speed and track conditions while communicating along the chain wirelessly.

http://www.electronics-eetimes.com/news/high-speed-trains-configure-dynamically

In a series of trials, the automotive electronics industry recently demonstrated that it is possible to connect multiple trucks to a “platoon” by means of nothing but an electronic information link. A similar technology is currently under development – for high-speed trains.


In railroad environments, the technology is called Virtual Coupling: Single railcars or multiple-wagons join together, forming one train. This enables railway operators to dynamically create long-distance trains; the wagons can join and leave the train if required by the respective journey. The benefit: Passengers can reach their destination without changing trains, which can save them time. In addition, the track utilization can be increased without the need to modify the infrastructure.

In such “virtual trains”, the components are not coupled physically to each other but instead through a wireless communications link. In the course of the development works, the German Aerospace Research Center (DLR) recently surveyed the transmission characteristics of such wireless links between wagons of high speed trains as well as between complete train formations to ensure reliable communications. The measurement works were executed between April 15 and April 19 on two high-speed trains of the Italian railroad company Trenitalia. The configuration allowed the DLR researchers to perform several scenarios and manoeuvres and thus investigate the transmission properties. “The stretch between Rome and Naples is particularly well suited for such measurements, because there we had the possibility to perform measurements at low speed in urban spaces, and we could prove that our systems work well during a high-speed ride”, explained Stephan Sand who oversees the land traffic section at DLR’s Institute of communications and navigation which developed the measurement setup.

The communication system included the Railway Collision Avoidance System (RCAS), a DLR-developed system that transmits real-time data including position, planned journey, speed and brake capabilities to all trains in the surrounding and thus contributing to identify potential conflicting situations. The system has already been tested in regional trains; the experiments between Rome and Naples were the first time the system was applied in high-speed trains.

Part of the project was to modernize the information exchange between the wagon of the train. Instead of a wirebound connection over the entire length of the train as it is the case with today’s railway technology, the DLR experts installed antennas on the roofs of the wagons. These antennas radioed the data from each wagon to the next one across the roofs of the cars.

The modernization of the data exchange between the wagons is relevant for the Train Control Monitoring System (TCMS). This system controls multiple safety-critical functions required to guarantee the safe operation of the trains.

The wireless technology applied also offers enormous advantages in terms of maintenance and reliability. With the existing technology, the cabling has to be replaced in the case of a malfunction – a complex and cost-intensive process. The propagation of the radio waves in the difficult high-speed train environment is however not a trivial thing either. Therefore, extensive measurements are necessary to create the technological foundation for future wireless approaches. To characterize the properties of the radio connections, the scenarios investigated passing and encountering. The results of the measurements enable the scientists to predict the behavior of the signal in varying environments.

The measurements were performed in the context of the EU project Roll2Rail, a flagship project within the Shift2Rail initiative which involves 21 European partners. The goals include developing key technologies for future railway traffic and increase safety and reliability of technologies utilized in this type of traffic.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,862
Location
Oakham
Interesting idea, but I would like to ask how this bit:

The communication system included the Railway Collision Avoidance System (RCAS), a DLR-developed system that transmits real-time data including position, planned journey, speed and brake capabilities to all trains in the surrounding and thus contributing to identify potential conflicting situations. The system has already been tested in regional trains; the experiments between Rome and Naples were the first time the system was applied in high-speed trains.

would cope with unplanned situations? For example: Would an emergency brake application on the front portion trigger the rest of the formation instantly? What if the front portion were to derail?
 

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,917
Interesting idea, but I would like to ask how this bit:



would cope with unplanned situations? For example: Would an emergency brake application on the front portion trigger the rest of the formation instantly? What if the front portion were to derail?

Just like HGV platoons.

When the gap between HGVs is closed up sufficiently to achieve the claimed fuel savings, if the first one stops suddenly the rest go into emergency stop and crash into each other. (Unless, of course, the platoon is designed to swerve lanes, sideswiping the mugs in cars out of the way).
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
Just like HGV platoons.

When the gap between HGVs is closed up sufficiently to achieve the claimed fuel savings, if the first one stops suddenly the rest go into emergency stop and crash into each other. (Unless, of course, the platoon is designed to swerve lanes, sideswiping the mugs in cars out of the way).

Considering it's done wirelessly and automatically, I have no idea how you conclude this would happen.
 

FordFocus

Member
Joined
15 Apr 2015
Messages
918
Interesting concept but different individual trains have different braking characteristics. Your travelling along a high speed line and the leading train makes an emergency brake application. The leading train has better brakes than the rear train, the rear can't stop in a time and goes into the back of the leading train.
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,304
Interesting concept but different individual trains have different braking characteristics. Your travelling along a high speed line and the leading train makes an emergency brake application. The leading train has better brakes than the rear train, the rear can't stop in a time and goes into the back of the leading train.

The distance between the two trains would be small enough that there wouldn't be enough time for the speed differential to grow large enough for there to be a real accident.
 

MrPIC

Member
Joined
30 May 2015
Messages
426
Is coupling/uncoupling really that troublesome? Tightlock/Dellner couplers are coupled and uncoupled within 2-3 minutes...
 

axlecounter

Member
Joined
23 Feb 2016
Messages
403
Location
Switzerland
In Italy they don't really like coupling and uncoupling trains. It's still something that needs to find its way in the railways' mentality.
 

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,917
Considering it's done wirelessly and automatically, I have no idea how you conclude this would happen.

If vehicles on a road are travelling at a closer spacing than a safe stopping distance and the first one stops dead for whatever reason, all the wireless and automatics in the world won't stop the following vehicles piling in.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Is coupling/uncoupling really that troublesome? Tightlock/Dellner couplers are coupled and uncoupled within 2-3 minutes...

The data connections are delicate and can become unreliable over time with repeated use due to grime and wear.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,792
Location
Scotland
If vehicles on a road are travelling at a closer spacing than a safe stopping distance and the first one stops dead for whatever reason, all the wireless and automatics in the world won't stop the following vehicles piling in.
Agreed if the leading vehicle does stop dead, however it has to decelerate so all that matters is that it doesn't have significantly better braking characteristics than the following vehicle. In this scenario the brake systems will be linked electronically - so that when the lead driver puts his foot on the brake the following vehicles will also be braking within milliseconds.
 

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,917
Agreed if the leading vehicle does stop dead, however it has to decelerate so all that matters is that it doesn't have significantly better braking characteristics than the following vehicle. In this scenario the brake systems will be linked electronically - so that when the lead driver puts his foot on the brake the following vehicles will also be braking within milliseconds.

Such lax standards are of course acceptable on roads where + or - 1000 deaths a year don't matter.

As a police officer I attended a road traffic accident where a 20 ton ingot fell off a lorry into the carriageway. Believe me. the vehicle that hit it stopped................dead!
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,792
Location
Scotland
Such lax standards are of course acceptable on roads where + or - 1000 deaths a year don't matter.
Given that the vast majority of accidents are due to the 'soft squidgy bit' behind the wheel, automation would likely result in fewer rather than more accidents.
As a police officer I attended a road traffic accident where a 20 ton ingot fell off a lorry into the carriageway. Believe me. the vehicle that hit it stopped................dead!
Realistically, how often is that kind of thing going to happen though?
 

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,917
Realistically, how often is that kind of thing going to happen though?

As I said, it's roads so + or - a thousand deaths is OK.

One such incident on rail would have the whole industry put through the wringer to make sure it never, ever happened again.
 

DerekC

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2015
Messages
2,448
Location
Hampshire (nearly a Hog)
Trials conducted in Naples on Trenitalia high speed trains by the German Aerospace Research Center of wireless rather than physical coupling of units to form trains. Idea is that a formation could be formed ad hoc to maximise available paths over a line section while minimising the unreliability issue of coupling wires. Works a lot like driverless cars, the driver in the lead unit drives the train and the units that form the train automatically travel safe braking distance apart according to speed and track conditions while communicating along the chain wirelessly.

http://www.electronics-eetimes.com/news/high-speed-trains-configure-dynamically

The link doesn't take me to the article and a search for "virtual coupling" in the ezine referred to doesn't come up with anything. Any clues?
 

InTheEastMids

Established Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
1,419
The data connections are delicate and can become unreliable over time with repeated use due to grime and wear.

Makes me think there could be a halfway house where two units are mechanically coupled, but talk to each other via wireless links*

What I think people need to be careful of, is the idea that the engineers have given little thought of potential failure modes and fail-safes. Having worked on autonomous systems some years ago, I can say with certainty that it's an immensely complicated topic, made worse by issues like cybersecurity. There are obviously risks, but there are obviously benefits too, which need to be balanced.

*Obviously not bog standard consumer-grade WiFi/Bluetooth. Infra-red might also have a role to play, maybe even ultrasound.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
Replace something mechanically and electronically simple and completely failsafe, like a current coupling system, with something hugely electronically complicated and potentially open to all manner of defects, failures, unforseen behaviours, reliability issues and even malicious attack? There is not an acknowledged major problem with 'the old fashioned way' of doing it, so I see little justification for massively overcomplicating a very straightforward operation!
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,775
Isn't GSM-R able to send an emergency stop command to all nearby trains already? I'm sure I've seen something about having to be careful when cleaning cabs in sidings by main lines because of the potential for chaos?
 

axlecounter

Member
Joined
23 Feb 2016
Messages
403
Location
Switzerland
Isn't GSM-R able to send an emergency stop command to all nearby trains already? I'm sure I've seen something about having to be careful when cleaning cabs in sidings by main lines because of the potential for chaos?

GSMR can send an emergency call, which is nothing but a phone call - but with the highest priority - that can be sent from any GSMR radio (i.e. train) by pressing just a button and is automatically adressed to all nearby trains. I think that's what was about the care needed when cleaning.

There's an emergency stop too, that automatically brakes the selected trains, but, AFAIK, that's only for ETCS L2 lines.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,583
Location
Macclesfield
Another issue. All carriages would be none gangway. A guards nightmare.
I believe the concept is being suggested as a substitute for conventional portion working with multiple units, not as a replacement for couplings between individual carriages within a unit. If the image at the top of the article is anything to go by, the trial undertaken on the Rome - Naples route probably utilised 11-car ETR 500 or 8-car ETR 1000 train sets.

It does raise an interesting point about duplication of traincrew though - would a driver still be required to monitor the activity of the trailing unit in the virtual formation, when with conventional coupling one driver for the whole train is sufficient?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Makes me think there could be a halfway house where two units are mechanically coupled, but talk to each other via wireless links*
That seems more likely to me: Retain the conventional method of working via the mechanical coupling, but replace the sensitive electrical hardware with a wireless system.

No doubt the developers will have wanted to prove the system in its' ultimate form during the trial to ensure robustness and advertise its' full potential.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
The link doesn't take me to the article and a search for "virtual coupling" in the ezine referred to doesn't come up with anything. Any clues?
Hopefully this link will work:
http://www.smart2zero.com/news/high-speed-trains-configure-themselves-dynamically
 
Last edited:

Phil.

Established Member
Joined
10 Oct 2015
Messages
1,323
Location
Penzance
When I looked at the title, "Virtual Coupling" I thought that perhaps Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin had got back to-gether.
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
If vehicles on a road are travelling at a closer spacing than a safe stopping distance and the first one stops dead for whatever reason, all the wireless and automatics in the world won't stop the following vehicles piling in.

Right, but that would be just as devastating as if they were coupled together given the tiny distances involved here. I don't see your point.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
Right, but that would be just as devastating as if they were coupled together given the tiny distances involved here. I don't see your point.

Presumably, being physically coupled adds extra stability so (for example) there's a greater chance of the vehicles remaining upright, even if still derailed?
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
Presumably, being physically coupled adds extra stability so (for example) there's a greater chance of the vehicles remaining upright, even if still derailed?

Do we know the distances between units here? 1m vs 1mm would make a big difference.
 

The Ham

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
12,076
Given that the vast majority of accidents are due to the 'soft squidgy bit' behind the wheel, automation would likely result in fewer rather than more accidents.

I was always told it was the nut behind the wheel that caused the most accidents.

Realistically, how often is that kind of thing going to happen though?

20T Ingots - fairly rarely; any large item falling on to the road, probably fairly regularly. Although the severity of such an incident could be fairly variable depending on how much notice the system received.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Presumably, being physically coupled adds extra stability so (for example) there's a greater chance of the vehicles remaining upright, even if still derailed?

Its debateable, jack knifing and concertinaing because they are all still joined is arguably worse causing more injuries. Carriages are best able to take an impact at the ends not on the sides. Also a rear unit derailing would drag the leading units in to the derailment.
 
Last edited:

GB

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
6,566
Location
Somewhere
Replace something mechanically and electronically simple and completely failsafe, like a current coupling system, with something hugely electronically complicated and potentially open to all manner of defects, failures, unforseen behaviours, reliability issues and even malicious attack? There is not an acknowledged major problem with 'the old fashioned way' of doing it, so I see little justification for massively overcomplicating a very straightforward operation!

Have to agree with that. Seems like over engineering and complicating for a problem that really isn't there.

I don't see the benefit in virtual couplings.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Its debateable, jack knifing and concertinaing because they are all still joined is arguably worse causing more injuries. Carriages are best able to take an impact at the ends not on the sides. Also a rear unit derailing would drag the leading units in to the derailment.

Fixed physical couplings substantially reduce the risk of passenger stock over riding each other.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top