• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Virgin Guard Assaulted

Status
Not open for further replies.

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,577
And then be shocked that said guard who sells the same 30 odd tickets 95% of the time doesn't know an easement that takes 3 hours of looking for alternate routes via routing maps is valid. Because they should look on iKB on the PC they have in the back cab...

That really isn't fair on RJ.
From his posts it is clear he has no problem if a member of staff does not know a particular easement or whatever if it is a bit "out there". The problem he has (and I agree with him) is where staff refuse to accept the very idea that they could be wrong and refuse to accept the evidence that shows they are wrong. Railway ticketing is complicated. We all know that. But that is no defense for the "I am right regardless of what you may show me" attitude that a small minority of staff have.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,815
Location
Back office
Of course there are the fighty ones, just like there are the ticket office staff, the drivers, the customer service staff, the police, the retail staff and every other job position in the country. Glad to know your opinion is right out there that we are the worst grade on the railway and deserve all hell we get, at least we have a starting point.

This thread is about a guard having been assaulted, so that's what I wrote about. Of course there are bad apples in other grades. If threads were raised about them and I felt strongly enough about it, I'd put my 2p in those threads too.

I'd love some details of these situations where you just rocked up, presumably not in (full) uniform and sorted it all out. And then why you have not been immediately hired as a nationwide advisor to any industry where confrontation happens and tell us all how to avoid it.

I'll give one. I was travelling on a train one weekend and there was a ticket inspection. A passenger sitting in the airline seat adjacent to mine had a whole load of open returns. I gather one was NSE discounted, but not valid and one was full fare, but was valid. For some odd reason, this passenger didn't want his full priced ticket to be stamped and insisted on buying a new one instead. The guard said he wasn't entitled to buy a discounted ticket on board, but the passenger wasn't happy about that. Then the guard launched into a full frenzied explanation. It made incredibly uncomfortable watching - the body language, effectively trapping the passenger in his seat, the belitting way he was speaking, as if he really wanted the passenger to know that he thought he was stupid. I thought it was a disgraceful way to address somebody to be honest. The guard then went off to fetch his machine. This passenger virtually had steam coming out of his ears and said something like "I'm going to f*** that c*** up...then got out of his seat in pursuit of the guard. I got up, stopped him in the vestibule and asked him to leave it, as it wasn't worth it. I told him the guard was right, but completely out of order the way he went on, then listened to the passenger say what he thought. He then returned to his seat, smarting but no longer in a rage.

That passenger didn't know I was railway staff and the guard never knew either, as he didn't get around to checking my ticket. The guard seemed genuinely oblivious as to how incensed the passenger was becoming whilst he was ranting on - though it was as clear as day to me.

Some people turn around as soon as they don't get their own way. Last week I got a double barrelled verbal assault, f-ing and blinding, jobsworth and all that. No doubt to you I did something awful to have deserved it and should have handled the situation differently. What did I do? "Sorry Sir, the train is full, I cannot carry your bike". For what its worth at my TOC as part of post-assault meetings the question of did the employee contribute is included.

I think it's virtually impossible to avoid being verbally assaulted when working in a customer facing role - some people are completely unreasonable and will go into one when you don't tell them what they want to hear. I've been on the receiving end of a few over the years. Even last weekend, a customer swore at me and started calling me names because she felt I was "conning" her. People will get something off their chest much more readily than physcially assaulting them - but there is a very thin line between the two sometimes - a smart response or even a mocking facial expression to a verbal assault can tip some people over the edge.

Again, physical assault is the topic which is why I didn't allude to verbal assaults. Physical assaults are on another level.

I would love to take you out of your utopian ticket office and prove to you the job of the guard is not some easy thing where all our problems are self caused and you could do it better...

I don't think it's an easy job at all - it takes a lot of skill to juggle the various responsibilities. There's a job to be done. Some people choose to do it in such a way that unnecessarily aggravates people.

He doesnt have time for that because he is looking for the latest easement he can misuse to save himself 50p. ;)

I've never misused an easement - I'd have to know the purpose in the first place, which don't tend to be published anywhere.
 
Last edited:

TheEdge

Established Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
4,498
Location
Norwich
This thread is about a guard having been assaulted, so that's what I wrote about. Of course there are bad apples in other grades. If threads were raised about them and I felt strongly enough about it, I'd put my 2p in those threads too.

But its not the first time you've taken the opportunity to attack the grade, last time it was how guards always offload their problems onto the poor old ticket office staff...

That passenger didn't know I was railway staff and the guard never knew either, as he didn't get around to checking my ticket. The guard seemed genuinely oblivious as to how incensed the passenger was becoming whilst he was ranting on - though it was as clear as day to me.

Exactly, you're just a bloke, not in uniform, stopping him from making it worse for himself, you are an ally, he had no reason to want to take it on with you. In uniform, you would have been an enemy and supporting the b*stard trying to get money out of him. Its easy when you are not in uniform, I've helped someone with missed connections due to delays on an advance (the guard was 6 coaches away at the dispatch position for the station we were approaching and the passenger in question needed to know before we arrived at that same station) and there was no snide comments or snipes about late running. If I do the same in uniform then the comments will flow.

but there is a very thin line between the two sometimes - a smart response or even a mocking facial expression to a verbal assault can tip some people over the edge.

A thin line you seem to assume is easy to see for everyone and anyone who crosses it has no-one to blame but themselves. I naturally smile and have an awful habit of almost smirking when I am nervous, I know I do it but I find it nigh on impossible to control. If I get decked because of it if someone misreads it do I only have to blame myself for pushing someone?

I don't think it's an easy job at all - it takes a lot of skill to juggle the various responsibilities. There's a job to be done. Some people choose to do it in such a way that unnecessarily aggravates people.

Then why the attitude that we do nothing but causes ourselves and other problems and seemingly taking a certain amount of glee from outsmarting or exposing problems with guards?
 

Dieseldriver

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2012
Messages
1,019
Brilliant RJ, so the guard must brought it on himself. Much in the same way that if a woman in a short skirt gets raped on a night out she must have brought it on herself as she was 'asking for it'?...
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,588
Location
Leeds
Brilliant RJ, so the guard must brought it on himself. Much in the same way that if a woman in a short skirt gets raped on a night out she must have brought it on herself as she was 'asking for it'?...
Sorry, but no, a massive no here, that's an absolutely unrelated, absurd and extreme comparison to make. <(
 

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,815
Location
Back office
Brilliant RJ, so the guard must brought it on himself. Much in the same way that if a woman in a short skirt gets raped on a night out she must have brought it on herself as she was 'asking for it'?...

With respect to the guard, I don't know what happened on the day. As I said, nobody deserves to be assaulted on duty. At the same time, certain courses of action lead to a heightened risk of it happening.

I don't think anything constructive can come out of bringing in irrelevant analogies. You said it, not me.

I'm not ignoring you TheEdge, will reply properly later.
 
Last edited:

Dieseldriver

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2012
Messages
1,019
Whilst trying to speculate as to why a crime has taken place and the actions of the victim, people all too easily forget that the massive issue here is the fact the crime took place full stop. No person in their job, or indeed social life, should tolerate being physically assaulted. Even if the guard was behaving in a certain way (which there is absolutely no evidence of in this case) they did not deserve to be assaulted. Any person who acts in that way quite frankly doesn't deserve to live in the generally safe and secure society that we enjoy and need to spend a little bit of time evolving into a fully functioning human being.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,577
Brilliant RJ, so the guard must brought it on himself. Much in the same way that if a woman in a short skirt gets raped on a night out she must have brought it on herself as she was 'asking for it'?...

Not at all, but if you really want to make the comparisons we can. I seem to remember while I was at uni there was quite an effort by the SU and the police in freshers week to drum it into people (especially the girls) that walking home alone late at night through lanes and dark streets was not the cleverest of things to do. Not because that the poor girl would be "asking for it" if anything happened, but because there are certain things that as an adult you try to reduce the risk of. Certainly you wouldn't leave your car unlocked on the street overnight would you.

What RJ is trying to say is that while no one deserves to be assaulted while in work, you can ensure you act in a way that reduces the risk. Now, personally I am not too convinced in what he is saying. I think if some idiot is going to thump a guard they will probably do that regardless. But in general, there is nothing at all wrong with reminding people that they can reduce the risk of bad things happening to them.
 

Dieseldriver

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2012
Messages
1,019
Trying to prevent becoming a victim of crime is something we all generally do day to day. Does not mean that if we do end up becoming a victim of crime that people should be spending so much time criticising our actions that they fail to see the real outrage is that the crime took part in the first place.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
A passenger sitting in the airline seat adjacent to mine had a whole load of open returns. I gather one was NSE discounted, but not valid and one was full fare, but was valid. For some odd reason, this passenger didn't want his full priced ticket to be stamped and insisted on buying a new one instead.
So a passenger didnt want his open return season ticket stamped and the guard was in the wrong, okay then.

I've never misused an easement - I'd have to know the purpose in the first place, which don't tend to be published anywhere.
A ticket valid from A to B via C (using a double back) is for passengers going to B but you will use it to go to C cheaper, yes its a silly situation and yes it is within the rules but it isnt what the easement is for, that is what I mean by misuse.
Lets leave it there without dragging this thread off topic, whatever that was again.;)
 

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,815
Location
Back office
So a passenger didnt want his open return season ticket stamped and the guard was in the wrong, okay then.

I said that I told the passenger the guard was correct in what he was saying. The guard was in the wrong for speaking to him in a way which probably made him feel 2cm tall. I don't support colleagues who use browbeating to deal with customers they think are difficult or stupid.

Some people may feel that it's justified, but the person on the receiving end won't always see it that way.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
But its not the first time you've taken the opportunity to attack the grade, last time it was how guards always offload their problems onto the poor old ticket office staff...

That was a specific scenario. A guard chose to send an angry passenger to the ticket office for a handout they weren't entitled to. I've been on the receiving end of people who get emotional over not getting a handout they've been told they'll get and it's not always pretty. Twice, the person became a danger to those around them before the BTP even arrived. One had to be tied up before being taken away. On another occasion, someone tried to thump down my window in a vain attempt to intimidate me. I stand by my suggestion of finding a way to defuse the situation without creating a risk for another front line member of staff.

Exactly, you're just a bloke, not in uniform, stopping him from making it worse for himself, you are an ally, he had no reason to want to take it on with you. In uniform, you would have been an enemy and supporting the b*stard trying to get money out of him. Its easy when you are not in uniform, I've helped someone with missed connections due to delays on an advance (the guard was 6 coaches away at the dispatch position for the station we were approaching and the passenger in question needed to know before we arrived at that same station) and there was no snide comments or snipes about late running. If I do the same in uniform then the comments will flow.

Yes, I've found that a uniform can be a like a red rag to a bull. People see one and feel it gives them a free licence to vent their frustrations. I've learned to let them. I completely agree with your comment about being an "ally." I've even taken on the role of the ally whilst in uniform to defuse an argument. I will back a colleague up with my primary concern being their welfare - not to provide a "united front" that makes the person feel like they are being ganged up on. Given this technique meant making the passenger feel like the member of staff did something wrong, I found it was best to remove one of them from the immediate vicinity. In the end, the situation was defused.


A thin line you seem to assume is easy to see for everyone and anyone who crosses it has no-one to blame but themselves. I naturally smile and have an awful habit of almost smirking when I am nervous, I know I do it but I find it nigh on impossible to control. If I get decked because of it if someone misreads it do I only have to blame myself for pushing someone?

Regardless of blame, if that line is crossed then someone could end up hurt. I feel that being able to spot when to stop and back away is an important part of any job where conflict is likely to happen. The company ought to invest in promising staff for whom this isn't a strong point. I see no shame whatsoever in getting the company to pay for personal development. I certainly would request training if it meant my chances of being assaulted were reduced.

I don't know you personally, but would hazard a guess that it hasn't happened before. As I've said, some people are nutters and would deck people for any reason. Reading between the lines, I'd certainly doubt that it would be your fault if that ever happened.


Then why the attitude that we do nothing but causes ourselves and other problems and seemingly taking a certain amount of glee from outsmarting or exposing problems with guards?

As a customer, I've had some bad experiences with staff being scornful and belittling towards me. It generates a certain feeling within, which I channel into typing up formal reports and posts of a blogging nature. Some people, with a much lower threshold for being demeaned, channel it through their fists in the heat of the moment.

I see quite a few posts on here about rubbish bus drivers and people receiving crap service from clerks at ticket office windows. I don't take offence to it or see it as an attack on the grade, because admittedly I think that there is some foundation to those grievances. I take it in and channel it into developing my own performance. I don't want to end up being posted about on here or complained about!

I've never taken any glee from outsmarting anybody. I wouldn't even call it that. At the moment, I get texts and emails from staff at various TOCs I don't work for who want to find out about certain tickets - I'm more than happy to help them out.
 
Last edited:

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,894
I do actually get RJ's point. I worked a delayed train the other week and I went around on departure checking tickets. A chap commented sarcastically that he didn't know how I had the gall to be checking tickets with that palaver. I quietly went back and pointed out that I wasn't checking tickets very closely, but it was the best and easiest way to engage each passenger and let them a) have a moan at the company rep and b) sort out things like missed connections, neither of which is achievable in the back cab. He chased after me half a coach later to apologise.

The other thing to remember is some guards take the job needlessly personally as if it's their own money at stake. It also is, unfortunately, the guard's problem that they don't know the routeing guide inside out and back to front as it is part of their employer's rules. It's not the passenger's problem that the company representative doesn't know the rules in detail, therefore it's the company's and by default therefore, it's the guard's problem. I'm not saying the lack of training is the guard's fault, but it is certainly the guard's problem… I don't know the routeing guide so as point of principle I don't make issues over routeing.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,183
Location
Bolton
I think we all need to cool down a bit. The main thing I'm taking away from this is that it's always difficult to make judgements on things like this because there are so many seemingly small things that could have affected the outcome. RJ is saying what could have happened, others pointed out at the top of the thread the way they saw it.

Life's too short to have this argument time and again I'm afraid!
 

muz379

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2014
Messages
2,501
That was a specific scenario. A guard chose to send an angry passenger to the ticket office for a handout they weren't entitled to. I've been on the receiving end of people who get emotional over not getting a handout they've been told they'll get and it's not always pretty. Twice, the person became a danger to those around them before the BTP even arrived. One had to be tied up before being taken away. On another occasion, someone tried to thump down my window in a vain attempt to intimidate me. I stand by my suggestion of finding a way to defuse the situation without creating a risk for another front line member of staff.
Im sorry but if someone become like that at the ticket office window over not being able to have a handout they where told they could have then you should not be suprised the guard sent them to you , regardless of what the guard had said to diffuse the situation they would have got a thump .Id rather send someone that confrontational and volatile to a ticket office. That's not dumping on my colleagues in the ticket office , that's common sense sending someone like that to where the staff will most likely have a panic button , a nice glass screen and a faster BTP response than I have on the train .

At least you where behind your nice ticket office window and im sure BTP arrived much quicker than they might have done had this incident happened on a train in the middle of nowhere . Where me and the other passengers dont have a glass screen to protect us from this maniac .

Ive sent people to ticket offices before with duff information before . We are human we do get it wrong sometimes , that does not mean that the person we have given wrong information to is in any way justified in smashing the ticket office window

I do agree with some of what you are saying , about some guards speaking to passengers in a certain way , and some guards certainly agitate confrontations with passengers . But we should still condemn people who chose to channel their anger through their fists and physically assault someone in the workplace regardless of how badly that person has been treated by the member of staff .

Some passengers especially teenagers know they can get away with murder and agitate confrontation with railway staff . Im not sure if you would take the same stance in defending the guard if they thumped a fare evader because the fare evader talked to the guard like he was a piece of c**p off the bottom of his shoes which very often happens .

I am certainly aware of how I behave and speak to customers when I am guarding because I am mindful of he fact that out there on the train it is just myself and the passengers and I cant rely on backup arriving quickly .

That being said I remember one incident when I asked politely that a passenger extinguish their cigarette as smoking was not permitted on board . The response was Or what you little p**k . Upon asking again I was threatened with violence . Needless to say said incident was reported to the BTP to try and get them to meet me at the trains terminus which was the next stop in about 8 minutes . By the time they arrived he was long gone and I was preparing for my return journey .

I have also had confrontation when asking a passenger to refrain from using their electronic cigarette after another passenger complained which led to a threat of violence . I even pointed out to them that I know that they are not harmful however the TOC I work for has decided that they do not permit them being used on the train .

I think the point you are missing is guards just like you will have to in a booking office have to tell passengers things they dont want to hear , be it that ticket is not valid and the ticket you need is £100 or stop smoking , or stop swearing . Sometimes you have to go out there and confront behavior directly because it is not acceptable . Unfortunately some people especially those who know they shouldn't be doing certain things wont take kindly to this and might react with threats and violence . Am I then to stop asking someone to put their cigarette out or stop swearing on a train full of children whose parents are complaining just because they have made a fuss or threatened me . If we go down those lines then they have won . Sometimes you have to confront someones behavior regardless .
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
Of course, if I work the train from the guards van, only stepping out to open and close the door, and never walk through the train unless absolutely necessary, keeping all passenger interactions to a minimum, I have reduced my risk of assault, abuse, complaints about how rude I am when telling somebody they have an invalid ticket, and generally avoided incident forms...
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
Of course, if I work the train from the guards van, only stepping out to open and close the door, and never walk through the train unless absolutely necessary, keeping all passenger interactions to a minimum, I have reduced my risk of assault, abuse, complaints about how rude I am when telling somebody they have an invalid ticket, and generally avoided incident forms...

And kept your Manger happy, until he looks at your takings for the month! ;)
 

muz379

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2014
Messages
2,501
Of course, if I work the train from the guards van, only stepping out to open and close the door, and never walk through the train unless absolutely necessary, keeping all passenger interactions to a minimum, I have reduced my risk of assault, abuse, complaints about how rude I am when telling somebody they have an invalid ticket, and generally avoided incident forms...
how dare you warn a drunken passenger that if they pull a pascom one more time they will be off at the next station .

Just after I had passed out as a guard the first late Friday I worked I was working a service from a notorious trouble spot and I had 3 pascom applications in the space of 2 stations .

As a result I warned all of the passengers who had obviously not seen anything despite being sat in the vicinity of the same pascom that had been pulled 3 times that if it happened again they would all be off at the next station . and would need to find alternative transport home . The rest of the journey was smooth .
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
On SWT the managers are always bleating on about the guards takings being below average blah blah blah, I thought FGW would be the same.

Naw, once there are no delays or incident forms, you're fine.
 

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,815
Location
Back office
Im sorry but if someone become like that at the ticket office window over not being able to have a handout they where told they could have then you should not be suprised the guard sent them to you , regardless of what the guard had said to diffuse the situation they would have got a thump .Id rather send someone that confrontational and volatile to a ticket office. That's not dumping on my colleagues in the ticket office , that's common sense sending someone like that to where the staff will most likely have a panic button , a nice glass screen and a faster BTP response than I have on the train .

At least you where behind your nice ticket office window and im sure BTP arrived much quicker than they might have done had this incident happened on a train in the middle of nowhere . Where me and the other passengers dont have a glass screen to protect us from this maniac .

Ive sent people to ticket offices before with duff information before . We are human we do get it wrong sometimes , that does not mean that the person we have given wrong information to is in any way justified in smashing the ticket office window

I do agree with some of what you are saying , about some guards speaking to passengers in a certain way , and some guards certainly agitate confrontations with passengers . But we should still condemn people who chose to channel their anger through their fists and physically assault someone in the workplace regardless of how badly that person has been treated by the member of staff .

Some passengers especially teenagers know they can get away with murder and agitate confrontation with railway staff . Im not sure if you would take the same stance in defending the guard if they thumped a fare evader because the fare evader talked to the guard like he was a piece of c**p off the bottom of his shoes which very often happens .

I am certainly aware of how I behave and speak to customers when I am guarding because I am mindful of he fact that out there on the train it is just myself and the passengers and I cant rely on backup arriving quickly .

That being said I remember one incident when I asked politely that a passenger extinguish their cigarette as smoking was not permitted on board . The response was Or what you little p**k . Upon asking again I was threatened with violence . Needless to say said incident was reported to the BTP to try and get them to meet me at the trains terminus which was the next stop in about 8 minutes . By the time they arrived he was long gone and I was preparing for my return journey .

I have also had confrontation when asking a passenger to refrain from using their electronic cigarette after another passenger complained which led to a threat of violence . I even pointed out to them that I know that they are not harmful however the TOC I work for has decided that they do not permit them being used on the train .

I think the point you are missing is guards just like you will have to in a booking office have to tell passengers things they dont want to hear , be it that ticket is not valid and the ticket you need is £100 or stop smoking , or stop swearing . Sometimes you have to go out there and confront behavior directly because it is not acceptable . Unfortunately some people especially those who know they shouldn't be doing certain things wont take kindly to this and might react with threats and violence . Am I then to stop asking someone to put their cigarette out or stop swearing on a train full of children whose parents are complaining just because they have made a fuss or threatened me . If we go down those lines then they have won . Sometimes you have to confront someones behavior regardless .

I understand it is very much a judgement call. Personally I wouldn't run the risk for a fare on a train. Smoking or anti social behaviour is a different matter - where safety is at risk, something has to be done. I worked as a proud London night bus driver for a bit and often had smokers on board. I'd stop the moment I got a whiff of it, get out of my cab, go upstairs and request they stop. Maybe I was lucky that they did every time. Sometimes I told them to got off. Once they moved so quickly they left their belongings behind. I got a few death threats, always on day routes but I never took them seriously. Funnily enough, it was because I chose to tell them to pay if they wanted to travel. I never, ever called the police.

I appreciate a train is a very different environment. It's great if the problem is easily solved. Unfortunately some people are very quick to get verbal, then physical. I respect the decision to apprehend such incidents then defer to the BTP. I also understand why a ticket office might seem like a good place to tell an aggrieved passenger to go - but if that placates them, it is really the case that nothing else can be said that will?

Hard as it is to say, it's an occupational hazard of working on the front line that people will occasionally talk to like you're something they stepped in. I operate on a "sticks and stones" basis whenever I'm on duty. It's natural to want to react but I override that and others do too. I wouldn't defend a member of staff who thumped such a passenger - unfortunately, a verbal provocation isn't a valid reason for hitting someone. It won't cover loss of income or becoming a litigant, no matter how much sympathy it might elicit.

People who do assault others quite rightly ought to be condemned. It is inexcusable. I feel it's also important to look into how the situation developed to see if it could have been avoided, if only to help others avoid a similar fate.
 
Last edited:

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,498
On SWT the managers are always bleating on about the guards takings being below average blah blah blah, I thought FGW would be the same.

Best thing about my TOC, most Managers don't give a damn about revenue taken. The few that do care don't really have any way to do anything about it. It took me a while to appreciate it, but my life is a lot less stressful now I do. The 'Kings of tickets' who take unbelievable amounts of money and those who don't even usually take a machine with them most shifts get treated exactly the same, with indifference. The former get more trouble from managers though because they're the ones who are more likely to delay trains, encounter trouble, screw up with the doors or have SASSPADs...

As much as it'll pain some people on this forum, in the eyes of management the key to the job is to keep your head down, keep the train moving safely and on time, make your announcements and avoid conflict. Frankly they make the job better than it should be!
 
Last edited:

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
The former get more trouble from managers though because they're the ones who are more likely to delay trains, encounter trouble, screw up with the doors or have SASSPADs...

Hopefully the driver spots it and doesnt move! :oops:
Milk and 2 sugars in my posh coffee please. ;)
 

Cumberlandkev

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2011
Messages
40
Location
Penrith
Published at 12:18, Monday, 01 September 2014
A Carlisle man who beat up a railway conductor after being thrown off a train for having no ticket has been sent to prison for 16 months.

Reece Bellas, 23, was on an early morning London-Glasgow train when the Asian inspector found he had no ticket.

He became abusive, shouting racist insults at the conductor, so was put off at Oxenholme station.

But there, he launched a lengthy attack on the conductor, knocking him to the platform and punching and kicking him as he lay on the ground.

Bellas, of Borland Avenue, Carlisle, pleaded guilty at the city's Crown Court to racially aggravated assault.

Published by http://www.newsandstar.co.uk
 

Merseysider

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
22 Jan 2014
Messages
5,625
Location
Birmingham
Published at 12:18, Monday, 01 September 2014
A Carlisle man who beat up a railway conductor after being thrown off a train for having no ticket has been sent to prison for 16 months.

Reece Bellas, 23, was on an early morning London-Glasgow train when the Asian inspector found he had no ticket.

He became abusive, shouting racist insults at the conductor, so was put off at Oxenholme station.

But there, he launched a lengthy attack on the conductor, knocking him to the platform and punching and kicking him as he lay on the ground.

Bellas, of Borland Avenue, Carlisle, pleaded guilty at the city's Crown Court to racially aggravated assault.

Published by http://www.newsandstar.co.uk

Excellent news. Personally, I'd have put him away for at least 3 years but 16 months is better than a soft community sentence.
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
Hope the guard is recovered from this. There but for the grace of God goes a lot of us.
 

ATW Alex 101

Established Member
Joined
28 Dec 2010
Messages
2,087
Location
Ellesmere port
This guy turns up an interesting Google search...

It's an embarrasment to live in the same world as these kind of people.
 

Merseysider

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
22 Jan 2014
Messages
5,625
Location
Birmingham
The pr*ck in question has already been jailed for racially aggravated assault (2012), burglary (2011), another burglary (2011), assault (2011), and god knows what else.

The fact he's been behind bars before for similar offences and yet is free to repeat them shows a failure in our justice system.
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,588
Location
Leeds
Published at 12:18, Monday, 01 September 2014
A Carlisle man who beat up a railway conductor after being thrown off a train for having no ticket has been sent to prison for 16 months.

Reece Bellas, 23, was on an early morning London-Glasgow train when the Asian inspector found he had no ticket.

He became abusive, shouting racist insults at the conductor, so was put off at Oxenholme station.

But there, he launched a lengthy attack on the conductor, knocking him to the platform and punching and kicking him as he lay on the ground.

Bellas, of Borland Avenue, Carlisle, pleaded guilty at the city's Crown Court to racially aggravated assault.

Published by http://www.newsandstar.co.uk
An excellent outcome. Here's hoping the TM recovers fully from this disgusting assault.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top