• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

UK Network ranked no.1 for improvements - is this an April Fool?

Status
Not open for further replies.

daccer

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2009
Messages
373
The following report has appeared on Network Rail's website. Just wondered if it is an unfunny April Fool or is the network really improving so rapidly? If it is a serious comparison then the total subsidy figures make for interesting reading (esp Germany).

http://www.networkrailmediacentre.c...sive-European-rail-comparison-study-published

Most comprehensive European rail comparison study published

Britain's railways are the most improved in Europe, according to the most comprehensive comparison study yet published of the rail networks in all 27 EU countries.

The report looks at how the railways in Europe have progressed and improved since the 1990s according to a range of 14 different factors. Britain came top in four of the factors, second and third in another two and fourth in three, coming top overall (see footnote 1)*.

Europe’s other big rail networks - Germany, France and Italy - came 7th, 10th and 23rd respectively.

Network Rail's chief executive, David Higgins said: "We made clear in our five year plan published in January that we are under no illusion about the challenges that both we, and the passengers who use the railway, face on a daily basis, and the need to keep improving from the low base to which Britain's railway had sunk in the 1990s. We continue to work with other railways so that we can all learn from best practice in our businesses and we welcome efforts by the Commission to provide improved consistency and transparency of data.

“This report shows both the progress that we have made in driving forward our performance, and the very real challenges and opportunities that the growth in demand poses for us all. We run one of Europe’s most intense, fastest growing railways with all the implications for wear and tear as well as congestion that that implies. That is why we have made the case for sustained investment in both renewing and modernising the railway while increasing its capacity.”

Vice-President of the Commission, Transport Commissioner Siim Kallas, said: “Europe's railways are in transition. New investment and new business models are needed to take advantage of the opportunities arising from high fuel costs, urbanisation and the need to decarbonise – and to counter the loss of government subsidies in a time of economic difficulty. That is why in January the Commission proposed major reforms in particular for the European passenger market. Today's report helps us compare railways across the EU in order to identify best practice. And it shows that there are many lessons to be learnt from the UK experience."

Michael Roberts, chief executive of the Association of Train Operating Companies, said: “This assessment highlights the real benefit which privately-run, publicly-accountable train companies have brought to passengers and taxpayers in Britain. After decades of decline, a booming railway is generating more money to pay for improvements both now and in the future, and it is good news if others in Europe can benefit from our experience.

“But we know there is still much to improve and many challenges to meet in the coming years, so we are working hard with the rest of the industry to make rail travel more affordable and offer even more and faster services that meet passengers’ expectations.”

Graham Smith, director-general of the Rail Delivery Group said; ‘It is pleasing to see the UK at the top of the European rail league in so many respects. It is the job of the Rail Delivery Group to keep the UK in that position and to lead the industry in improving its placing where there are opportunities for improvement’.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

daccer

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2009
Messages
373
I think my April Fool crack was a bit tongue in cheek. I did assume it was straight up but I thought it made interesting reading considering some of the angst we have been through recently over the cost of the railways.
 

CallySleeper

Established Member
Joined
27 Jun 2006
Messages
1,662
Location
trentbartonland
The most surprising bit for me was that we have better punctuality figures than France and Germany - although are they recorded using the same "late" value?
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,948
Location
Fenny Stratford
No, it is entirely true. It has been on the intranet for some time and we got a heads up about 10 days ago.
 

chuckles1066

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2010
Messages
361
One of my beefs with the rail network, when I had the misfortune to be forced into using it, had nothing to do with punctuality......I can put up with a train turning up a few minutes late, in the grand scheme of life it's nothing.

It was to do with one train an hour turning up shortformed so that you were forced to stand around on a platform in temperatures of -8C for another hour.

Where is that in the report, I'd be interested to read it?
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
As the man from Network Rail says, the UK has improved in a number of areas, but from a low base. Ridership per capita is still considerably lower than in many other European countries, particularly if you strip out the London & SE commuter market. In other words, the UK is catching up, but still has some way to go.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,731
Mr Higgins was making a big thing about it over the last couple of weeks at the yearly NR staff conference things.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,963
. Ridership per capita is still considerably lower than in many other European countries, particularly if you strip out the London & SE commuter market.

If you strip out LSE for the GB figures, then presumably you would strip out the Ile de France from the SNCF figures, and the Berlin & Munich S-bahns from the DB figures.

In other news Wolves is the best supported football club in the UK per head of population - if you strip out all the others that have more.
 

Cherry_Picker

Established Member
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
2,825
Location
Birmingham
Quite pleased by this. The myth that it's only the UK where trains are late, everything is brilliant everywhere else and we should be ashamed of ourselves is one of the things that annoys me most when people start talking about the railways.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
If you strip out LSE for the GB figures, then presumably you would strip out the Ile de France from the SNCF figures, and the Berlin & Munich S-bahns from the DB figures.

In other news Wolves is the best supported football club in the UK per head of population - if you strip out all the others that have more.

Not really a fair comparison because the SE commuter area is far more captive and extensive than say those in Berlin and Munich. The UK does well on trips where the car is not a great option, which is mainly trips to London. Rail travel is still a more effective competitor against the car in, say, Germany on trips where car travel is viable. Hopefully schemes like the Northern Hub and Transpennine electrification will mean that ridership outside the SE will reach levels comparable with places like Munich.
 

WestCoast

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,665
Location
South Yorkshire
Some very interesting and encouraging figures in that report, motivational for the people making it happen. I'm very impressed about how much rail traffic has grown in recent years, it appears we really are living in the 'age of the train'.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
If you strip out LSE for the GB figures, then presumably you would strip out the Ile de France from the SNCF figures, and the Berlin & Munich S-bahns from the DB figures.

In other news Wolves is the best supported football club in the UK per head of population - if you strip out all the others that have more.

No, Radamfi is right, regional public transport ridership per capita is still significantly higher in many European countries that are comparable to the UK. Taking away Berlin and Munich S-Bahns from DB's figures would still leave you with e.g. the Hamburg S-Bahn (~600,000 daily), Rhein-Main and Rhein-Neckar (~550,000 daily), Stuttgart (~340,000 daily), Rhein-Ruhr (~340,000 daily) e.t.c. I believe LM's daily ridership, the principal rail operator in Britain's second largest conurbation, carry about 160,000 - 180,000 daily, based on their annual figures (and that's including traffic on the non-local routes).

London and the SE is the primary hub of the rail system in the UK and where the per capita ridership rates are the highest.
 
Last edited:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,963
I didn't explain myself very well. What I meant was that this report is a comparison of national rail networks. To strip out the busiest bit of our network and then say it doesn't compare well is doing us down.

Fact of the matter is that LSE is part of the GB network (an admittedly significant part), and the national comparisons stand as they are.

Regardless, it is good to see a piece of research like this. It evidences what many of us have thought / known for a good few years. I wonder if the D*ily M*il will run the story.
 

WestCoast

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,665
Location
South Yorkshire
I didn't explain myself very well. What I meant was that this report is a comparison of national rail networks. To strip out the busiest bit of our network and then say it doesn't compare well is doing us down.

Yes, I'd agree with that, you can only compare what you have.

Improving regional ridership in the UK is an entirely different matter, which may come into fruition in the long-term by further economic decentralisation, rising fuel costs and resulting infrastructure improvements.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
Over the period studied, the demographic changes in the UK were rather different to those in the three other countries in the comparison. Germany and Italy especially experienced much lower population growth compared to the UK due to low birth rates and much lower rates of immigration. Eastern European immigrants to the UK are very likely to use public transport as they were used to doing so back home. The UK economy grew substantially faster than the other three countries in the survey over the period in question. The London economy in particular has boomed and only experienced a modest recession compared to the rest of the UK. London's population grew substantially. Of course, all public transport in London, not just National Rail, has seen a dramatic increase in patronage.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,279
Of course if you start from a lower base, it's easier to improve. German railways were very good 20 years ago already. The French had some of their TGV lines already (their classic lines are nowhere near as good)

If you go to Europe you notice the frequency is often worse than here. There aren't too many intercity connections with a 20 or 30 minute frequency like we have between London and Birmingham and Manchester. In Italy, I've been caught out by how infrequent some of the services can be, and this wasn't in some remote part of the country.

Oh, in the Netherlands last summer, there were major problems on the route I wanted to take, so it's not just here where things go wrong...
 

332 > 444

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2007
Messages
532
Location
London
From travelling quite a bit around Germany especially the Bavaria region, services are good but when they are delayed, THEY ARE DELAYED! I'm talking over an hour delays especially when the frequency is like 1ph or 1p2h to major destinations.

On the other hand, delayed trains of say maybe 10 - 15 mins, connecting trains do actually wait unlike here where any train can depart from any platform, they 95% of the time always depart from the same platform.

Also the rural lines are quite neglected in terms of infrastructure, like single track (esp at some of Munich's S-Bahn routes) quite infrequent services served by 1 or 2 car trains, so its not just here that sometimes suffer. Metropolitan areas always will have a higher rider ship than smaller towns.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top