InkyScrolls
On Moderation
Fantastic to see the (hopefully long term) fall of the SNP!
i agree - they will have to be open and transparent about their donors and have their policy scrutinised in much more detail! I am sure Farage will be pleased to have retained his seat on question time west.Yes, exactly this. Reform only got the votes they did because (a) they were seen as an alternative to the Tories (a protest vote if you like), and (b) the Tories were so incredibly unpopular. However, there was incredibly little light shone on what Reform actually stood for, since Farage only jumped on his own bandwagon four weeks before the election.
Now they have four MPs the light will be upon them and will probably reveal them for what they are i.e. a bunch of chancers with shoddy and un-costed policies and a more than slight dose of racism and bigotry thrown in.
You clearly don't understand UK politics.There's history, antagonism and egos to contend with, but one lesson from the election (which the government lost - it wasn't a huge endorsement of Labour - is that in a couple of years, the right wing parties of Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Reform UK ought consider merging, or if that's impossible, striking a formal Coalition agreement. Not suggesting this is easy.
This is what in Queensland, Australia, the Liberals (conservatives) and Nationals (historically rural-based as the Country Party) did. Although my nation has vastly different preferential voting to your FPTP, Federally as well as in some states, being united has been seen as maximising the utility of the non-Labor (our spelling) vote.
NZ has a three party Coalition government not long elected. But again, a vastly different electoral system to the UK (and Australia).
It's hard to see Mr Farage's Reform party winning on its own.
Labour/Labor is the enemy, and a formidable one.
With only a 1.7% increase of the vote based on the 2019 election, it would be safe to say that the Labour popularity has not increased significantly to warrant the landslide, rather that the Conservative vote has been decimated and spread out between others, not necessarily to Labour (as Yardley showed as an example) - there is plenty of work for Labour to doToday is a great day. Labour have won a massive landslide. However, the hard work starts now. it isn't the same as 1997. It is graft everyday from now. Labour have to be perfect everyday or the Tory press will attack them in a way they wont when the Tory's mess up. There is no honeymoon to be had. it is an extraordinary victory but means nothing without delivery, improvement and change. However, things can only get better!
im afraid a total lack of humility and integrity from any of them for their failings really upset loyal Tory voters who stayed awayAs a Conservative supporter, I'm not surprised at the hammering they have received in the election. The combination of scandal, division and chaos from Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Liz Truss made it unwinnable for them.
I hope not the Tory party need to implode and reincarnate themselves as one nation tory grouping and the rest can fuse themselves with reform then we might get a half decent centrist party which people can get behind.However, I do take some comfort from that a quite a few of the hard right MPs have list their seats, so hopefully, the part can refocus on becoming center-right and rebuild.
[Ducks back behind the parapet]
I find that rather hilarious and more than a little disingenuous. The SNP are widely known for caring about only one thing, Scottish independence, which any sane person realises would be a massive case of Scotland shooting itself in the foot. To claim that that stance had nothing to do with their defeat last night is, simply put, nonsense.Alex Salmond, who preceded Ms Sturgeon as SNP leader and first minister, said the "slaughter of the SNP" was not due to its support for Scottish independence.
He added: "How could it be? The SNP did not even campaign on it."
In my opinion he would be the best leader out of the likely candidates to rebuild the party as a sane and electable one, but he won't get the job even if he makes the cut to be one of the two choices given to the membership (assuming the system is similar to last time). The membership will go for whoever stands against him, which will condemn the party to being out of power for longer than otherwise.Jeremy Hunt will almost certainly try and become party leader IMO it's a surprise he kept his seat.
Its a futile to rebuild the party it needs to force a split into one nation grouping and a right wing grouping otherwise the wounds will never heal and more importantly the country wont have an electable centrist party that has a chance of a majority.In my opinion he would be the best leader out of the likely candidates to rebuild the party as a sane and electable one, but he won't get the job even if he makes the cut to be one of the two choices given to the membership (assuming the system is similar to last time). The membership will go for whoever stands against him, which will condemn the party to being out of power for longer than otherwise.
But I say that as a former middle-of-the-road Conservative, and we're out of fashion at the moment.
lf Hunt becomes leader then all it will show is that the party hasn’t learned its lesson as to why they lost.Jeremy Hunt will almost certainly try and become party leader IMO it's a surprise he kept his seat.
the Tories are saying the Labour majority is " a mile wide and an inch deep" and i agree. In the north east seats i know there was a large swing to Reform. There hard work starts now.With only a 1.7% increase of the vote based on the 2019 election, it would be safe to say that the Labour popularity has not increased significantly to warrant the landslide, rather that the Conservative vote has been decimated and spread out between others, not necessarily to Labour (as Yardley showed as an example) - there is plenty of work for Labour to do
I don't get this idea of the "Tory press". All I see is an establishment press. Both the Tories and Labour are establishment and parties that will essentially keep the status quo. The press are far more anti-establishment so parties like Reform are their target, not Labour.Today is a great day. Labour have won a massive landslide. However, the hard work starts now. it isn't the same as 1997. It is graft everyday from now. Labour have to be perfect everyday or the Tory press will attack them in a way they wont when the Tory's mess up. There is no honeymoon to be had. it is an extraordinary victory but means nothing without delivery, improvement and change. However, things can only get better!
As an aside i wonder if there are people in certain constituencies waking up regretting that vote for the greens or lib dems that led to a Tory keeping their seat?
I always enjoy this idea that once people know who Reform/Farage really are, they will think twice. Can people such as yourself simply not believe that some people want lower immigration, lower taxes, more freedom/democracy and repeal of the equality act which has fuelled so much of the divisive DEI agenda? Just to name a few things that no other party offers.i agree - they will have to be open and transparent about their donors and have their policy scrutinised in much more detail! I am sure Farage will be pleased to have retained his seat on question time west.
Perhaps the media will give the Greens, who have 4 seats like Reform, a similar platform.
He really fought for it in the end, apparently he personally funded his campaign somewhat and he also had to do a lot of local work, rather than support the national campaign.Jeremy Hunt will almost certainly try and become party leader IMO it's a surprise he kept his seat.
Jeremy Hunt's wife works for the Chinese Communist Party. It would be dangerous to continue to allow Hunt to assume senior positions.In my opinion he would be the best leader out of the likely candidates to rebuild the party as a sane and electable one, but he won't get the job even if he makes the cut to be one of the two choices given to the membership (assuming the system is similar to last time). The membership will go for whoever stands against him, which will condemn the party to being out of power for longer than otherwise.
But I say that as a former middle-of-the-road Conservative, and we're out of fashion at the moment.
So, did Labour win the election, or did Reform and Apathy lose it for the conservstives?
I’m looking forward to some analysis which shows what would have happened if all Reform votes had been made for the conservatives instead.
There's also the factor that any move by the Conservatives towards Reform policies loses them votes to the LibDems or Labour. Perhaps not so much this time because most of those swing voters had probably given up on the Tories already, but it does highlight that it's simplistic just to add the two figures together and say they would have won if united.That analysis only makes sense if you presume that Reform have taken votes almost exclusively from the Conservatives - and I don't believe that for a moment. From what I saw of poll trends, it seemed to me that when the Reform vote rose in the opinion polls, Labour and Tories tended to fall equally. My impression is that Reform voters tend to be pro-Brexit people who now hate the Tories but don't trust Labour/want something totally different. I reckon at least something like 40% of those people would break for Labour if Reform didn't exist.
They'll be supporting Rejoin then...In Northern Ireland Jim Allister has ended 54 years of the Paisley dynasty sitting in parliament and taken North Antrim from the DUP. He stood as a candidate TUV-ReformUK alliance (with TUV - No Sea Border on the ballot papers but equal prominence to TUV and ReformUK on publicity.)
Elsewhere in NI, an independent has won in North Down. Arlene Foster said on GBNews this morning he would also sit with Reform but cannot see this mentioned anywhere else other than the fact that TUV supported him for the seat and didn’t stand a candidate of their own.
The fragility of his majority is another factor that counts against him.In my opinion he [Hunt] would be the best leader out of the likely candidates to rebuild the party as a sane and electable one, but he won't get the job even if he makes the cut to be one of the two choices given to the membership (assuming the system is similar to last time). The membership will go for whoever stands against him, which will condemn the party to being out of power for longer than otherwise.
It's easy enough to be taken in by a party's policies at the outset, then change your mind once you take a deeper look. Despite Reform's claims that they were vetting candidates, it didn't take long for the nasty element to rear its ugly head. Comments about the PM being a p*** and using migrants for target practice is not a good look.I always enjoy this idea that once people know who Reform/Farage really are, they will think twice. Can people such as yourself simply not believe that some people want lower immigration, lower taxes, more freedom/democracy and repeal of the equality act which has fuelled so much of the divisive DEI agenda? Just to name a few things that no other party offers.
Exit Poll:
Lab 410
Con 131
LD 61
Ref 13
SNP 10
PC 4
Grn 2
I'm afraid a total lack of humility and integrity from any of them for their failings really upset loyal Tory voters who stayed away
But I say that as a former middle-of-the-road Conservative, and we're out of fashion at the moment.
As much as I am very happy to see labour win. This highlights the issue with FPTTP, The country is ruled by a party who do not have a majority of the people voting for them.Attached from Reuters (https://www.reuters.com/graphics/BRITAIN-ELECTION/RESULTS/lbvgllknbpq/) showing vote share.
2019 Conservative 43.6% - Other 8.4%
2024 Conservative 23.7% - Other 27.3%
All other parties not significantly changed.
1997 Labour 43.2%
2024 Labour 33.8%
The way our systems works translates this into a Labour "landslide" but it isn't really, or at least it only is in terms of numbers of seats, which is of course important. But it does not indicate a "seismic" change if the Conservatives can get their act together. I predict they won't for quite a while to come, though.
View attachment 161297
I don't agree one bit, his relatively small majority today represents a low point under unusual circumstances and will be replaced with a healthy "business as usual" majority in future elections.The fragility of his majority is another factor that counts against him.
Absolutely. Hopefully having to actually do some work will mean that Reform fall off a cliff, but the thinness of even some of the "safe" Labour majorities is definitely cause for concern there.the Tories are saying the Labour majority is " a mile wide and an inch deep" and i agree. In the north east seats i know there was a large swing to Reform. There hard work starts now.
Yes, lots of people want those things. The sort of people who believe "equality" is not a good thing, clearly. We have a word for such people.I always enjoy this idea that once people know who Reform/Farage really are, they will think twice. Can people such as yourself simply not believe that some people want lower immigration, lower taxes, more freedom/democracy and repeal of the equality act which has fuelled so much of the divisive DEI agenda? Just to name a few things that no other party offers.
Totally well deserved and it's going to be such fun watching the SNP and its many supporters not admitting defeat or losing badly and trying ever so ever so ever so hard not to gloat for the next whileProbably not wise to crow too much. The SNP got just as big a spanking as the Tories. Which is just as funny and just as deserved.