You really do like rewriting history to make keep your crusade against NEXUS going. I suggest you try reading the ITA minutes from when the invigoration project was first announced. They were awarded government funding on the basis that a concession was let and stock was given life extending refurbs. New stock was and is still part of phase 3 of the process which will only get the final go ahead once phase 2 government targets have been shown to have been met.
I don't have a crusade against Nexus... They've done quite a lot for our transport, but when they mess things up why shouldn't they be pointed out? Why can't facts be posted? Metro has no money, because they are being fined by Nexus. That means no new staff employed by DB and no money from DB being put back into the system. The no new staff also means they can't get more staff in the depot to help maintain the trains better which also won't be helping.
I'm well aware of why they couldn't get new trains, they weren't sure if the Government at the time would fund new trains and so by choosing to go for refurbishment they were almost guaranteed the funding. However, they knew these refurbs wouldn't last 20 years, but that's what they are wanting now and quite simply it isn't going to work. As I mentioned previously, a member of Nexus staff in the travel shop was saying how she's heard that in 10/15 years we will be seeing a reduced train service because the trains won't be able to cope. And that's from a Nexus member of staff, it may just be rumour but there sure is likely some truth behind it.
If people don't question these things than nothing will be done and we'll just have to suffer an inferior service. The Metro service is booming, lots of people using it to get around and ditching their cars. You will lose all those people if nothing is done and it will only put more pressure onto our already overcrowded roads.
Indeed, it was always agreed new stock would not come until Phase 3 of the project and perhaps in hindsight, Nexus should of started to draw up plans earlier on about new stock instead of concentrating on unrealistic(imo) projects of street tram running but DB knew what they were signing up for and they know if they don't meet Nexus targets then they will risk of incurring fines.
The trains are showing their age but as a regular user of the Metro to head to and from work, I can honestly say there was only one occasion where I thought I was going to be late due to an issue on the metro since starting me job last August and I have to use the metro 5 days a week.
Its not perfect and yes there are countless trains withdrawn from service which don't get reported but considering the units are over 30 years old, is this really too much of a surprise? Most delays on the Metro are not especially severe(compare to the mainline) and I just feel people need to head out earlier just in the event of any delays.
And there is one of the problems, Nexus want to try and have to many vanity projects. I'm surprised Nexus didn't start pushing for new trains, since the Autumn statement is supposedly going to include huge new infrastructure projects for the North East. Nexus could have used that as a way to pressure for new trains as well as potentially new routes.
I have to ask but which is your line, are you on the South Gosforth - Pelaw section or on one of the branches?
I travel roughly 5 days a week and I can guarantee at least 3 of those days will have some problem whether it be a door fault, train fault, or the train just generally running late because the train that was 3 minutes early was let go early.
But that's the problem, the trains are 30 years old and train failures will happen but why should the public have to put up with it? Don't get me wrong, without the Metro we'd all be lost - thankfully the local bus is more frequent than the Metro and operates longer hours than the Metro, but for some people the Metro is the only way they can get into town.