• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Tyndrum (Upper and Lower)

Status
Not open for further replies.

JamieL

Member
Joined
6 Aug 2022
Messages
913
Location
UK
I understand that Tyndrum is the smallest village in the world to have two railway stations. Clearly this is a consequence of the junction at Crianlarich where the Oban line branches from the West Highland line. But it seems strange that the small village retained two stations post-Beeching. Anyone travelling up to Glasgow is served equally by both as the trains join at Crianlarich. And for down passengers Oban is presumably the main destination as it is a shorter journey to the supermarket. It is difficult to imagine many Tyndrum passengers bound for Fort William.

Given the above, it seems odd that Tyndrum Lower wasn't retained as the sole station and Tyndrum Higher closed. Was there any reason which kept both open? And why are both still open?
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,490
Location
Northampton
I imagine traffic patterns in the 1960s were quite different to today. The sleeper would probably have been viewed as very important in the context of slower daytime trains and much more need to travel to do business in person. Nowadays do the stations form part of the operating procedure for the junction in the Up/southbound direction?
 

Class 170101

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,661
Might be of more value if the Sleeper had three departures from Euston
Lowland, Inverness / Aberdeen and Oban / Fort William
 

Big Jumby 74

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2022
Messages
2,231
Location
UK
There are many tourist walks/cycle ways in the West Highlands these days which rely on such stations being kept open, these tourist ways etc, being (in many cases) the original routes that the Army marched from Scotland to all parts South in years past, long before any railway existed in the area, but the very reason these routes exist today.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,490
Location
Northampton
Might be of more value if the Sleeper had three departures from Euston
Lowland, Inverness / Aberdeen and Oban / Fort William
Is there really the market for that, or would you open the West Highland train up to Edinburgh passengers as well?
 

Peter0124

Established Member
Joined
20 Nov 2016
Messages
2,745
Location
Glasgow
Is there really the market for that, or would you open the West Highland train up to Edinburgh passengers as well?
Wouldn't it be better to just run the West Highlander direct via Glasgow in that case as the split could happen at Carstairs, or maybe Crianlarich if it can handle it?
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,490
Location
Northampton
Wouldn't it be better to just run the West Highlander direct via Glasgow in that case as the split could happen at Carstairs, or maybe Crianlarich?
You are still going to need something other than London-West Highland passengers to cover the costs of running a dedicated train. At the moment 1 16-carriage train covers all 3 destinations.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,175
Location
0035
ls there really much cost of keeping a station open in such the circumstances, especially at low-speed locations such as this? Many of the Beeching-era closures took place at a time where stations were quite heavily manned, and were criticised for failing to consider other ways of reducing costs such as de-staffing, replacing expensive-to-maintain buildings with simpler shelters, etc., which is not so much of an issue today.
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,712
The trains didn't split/join at Crianlarich in the Beeching era though did they?
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,490
Location
Northampton
ls there really much cost of keeping a station open in such the circumstances, especially at low-speed locations such as this? Many of the Beeching-era closures took place at a time where stations were quite heavily manned, and were criticised for failing to consider other ways of reducing costs such as de-staffing, replacing expensive-to-maintain buildings with simpler shelters, etc., which is not so much of an issue today.
Was either Tyndrum station a Block Post before RETB came in? If it was just an unstaffed platform then there probably wasn't much to be gained from closure - it's not like the site would be particularly valuable for development.
 

Class 170101

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,661
Is there really the market for that, or would you open the West Highland train up to Edinburgh passengers as well?
Maybe in the summer, but might worth opening to Edinburgh as you say, but to be honest is there a big market for any of the sleeper services?
 

Railsigns

Established Member
Joined
15 Feb 2010
Messages
2,754
I understand that Tyndrum is the smallest village in the world to have two railway stations. Clearly this is a consequence of the junction at Crianlarich where the Oban line branches from the West Highland line.
It's not a consequence of the junction at Crianlarich; Tyndrum has two stations (and Crianlarich used to have two) because the Callander and Oban Railway and the West Highland Railway both constructed separate lines through Strath Fillan, each with their own separate stations.

If Upper Tyndrum station was closed, every train would still need to stop there because it's an RETB token exchange point. It's also the boundary between the north and south RETB interlocking areas and a crossing loop location.
 

BlueLeanie

On Moderation
Joined
21 Jul 2023
Messages
723
Location
Haddenham
You're overthinking this.

Even today, there's a reason why the first train of the day into Oban is at 08:35, and there's a service that goes to Dalmally just after 16:00

Oban station is a 10 minute walk from Oban High.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
12,962
Location
Up the creek
Was either Tyndrum station a Block Post before RETB came in? If it was just an unstaffed platform then there probably wasn't much to be gained from closure - it's not like the site would be particularly valuable for development.

My well-thumbed 1978 rail atlas shows Upper as a passing loop, but not Lower. I think the loop at Lower went fairly early; Railscot says 1969.

The trains didn't split/join at Crianlarich in the Beeching era though did they?

Until the end of 1965 the trains to Oban came via Callender, with only a few excursions using the connection.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
10,488
Location
Preston Lancs
I remember in my bashing days that there were some good moves available. Class 37 to upper, then walk to lower and another Class 37 etc.
 

hermit

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2019
Messages
443
Location
Isle of Wight
No one has mentioned the most interesting question, which is why the stations are named Upper Tyndrum and Tyndrum Lower, with the adjectives respectively before and after the place name.
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,712
No one has mentioned the most interesting question, which is why the stations are named Upper Tyndrum and Tyndrum Lower, with the adjectives respectively before and after the place name.

For clarity when RETB was introduced. Up until then there was consistency

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Until the end of 1965 the trains to Oban came via Callender, with only a few excursions using the connection.

Indeed. And then separate trains until after sprinterisation
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
11,957
Location
here to eternity
No one has mentioned the most interesting question, which is why the stations are named Upper Tyndrum and Tyndrum Lower, with the adjectives respectively before and after the place name.

So as to avoid communication confusions when using RETB signalling.
 

BlueLeanie

On Moderation
Joined
21 Jul 2023
Messages
723
Location
Haddenham
Tyndrum is just outside the catchment area for Oban High School, as well as being in a different council area.

We're talking 1965. From what I can see Stirling Council wouldn't have existed back then, the predecessor Central Council wouldn't have existed back then, and according to old maps it was in Perthshire.

There have always been local arrangements for awkward geography and access to services. They probably took the train to McLaren High in Callander until the line closed.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,295
Location
Glasgow
The trains didn't split/join at Crianlarich in the Beeching era though did they?
Only since Sprinterisation. Even when the C&O shut, Oban trains ran seperate from Fort William/Mallaig ones.

Until the end of 1965 the trains to Oban came via Callender, with only a few excursions using the connection.
There was a regular SX limited stop 'Diesel Express' from Glasgow Queen Street to Oban in the morning and vice-versa in the evening since 1962 running via the West Highland to Oban instead of the C&O route. Complementing the 4 day trains and one sleeper via the traditional route.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
12,962
Location
Up the creek
We're talking 1965. From what I can see Stirling Council wouldn't have existed back then, the predecessor Central Council wouldn't have existed back then, and according to old maps it was in Perthshire.

There have always been local arrangements for awkward geography and access to services. They probably took the train to McLaren High in Callander until the line closed.

I have a feeling that they might have been weekly boarders somewhere. There was a weekday turn when the Killin branch train went to Callender in the afternoon to bring the Killin children back, but on Fridays it went through from Callender to (I think) Luib with the weekly boarders, before returning to Killin Junction to collect the Killin children who had been kicking their heels at the Junction. I would therefore presume that Tyndrum’s children also boarded somewhere; perhaps they also boarded at Callender, but had to wait for a later train home to avoid really messing up the Killin branch service.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,353
Location
Somerset
Anyone travelling up to Glasgow is served equally by both as the trains join at Crianlarich.

Given the above, it seems odd that Tyndrum Lower wasn't retained as the sole station and Tyndrum Higher closed. Was there any reason which kept both open? And why are both still open?
The trains may join / split at Crianlarich now - but that was not the case prior to the introduction of multiple units.
Sorry - this has already been said!
 

Cantab26

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2016
Messages
1,948
We're talking 1965. From what I can see Stirling Council wouldn't have existed back then, the predecessor Central Council wouldn't have existed back then, and according to old maps it was in Perthshire.
It was in the Western District of Perth.
There have always been local arrangements for awkward geography and access to services. They probably took the train to McLaren High in Callander until the line closed.
They did - and now travel back and forth by bus.
I have a feeling that they might have been weekly boarders somewhere. There was a weekday turn when the Killin branch train went to Callender in the afternoon to bring the Killin children back, but on Fridays it went through from Callender to (I think) Luib with the weekly boarders, before returning to Killin Junction to collect the Killin children who had been kicking their heels at the Junction. I would therefore presume that Tyndrum’s children also boarded somewhere; perhaps they also boarded at Callender, but had to wait for a later train home to avoid really messing up the Killin branch service.
Yes, at the time there were weekly boarders at McLaren.

Killin was also formerly a junior high school and took pupils up to Second Year to reduce the need to travel and board.

And it’s Callander, not Callender.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
12,962
Location
Up the creek
Yes, at the time there were weekly boarders at McLaren.

I looked at a contemporary map and you crossed into Dunbarton a short way south and into Argyll a short way west, while to the north there is nothing, so I presume that pupils from Crianlarich and Tyndrum would have weekly boarded. I presume that the school day was arranged to allow them to arrive on the 06.05 Oban, at least on Monday.

And it’s Callander, not Callender.

I was concentrating too much on getting the last vowel correct!
 

hermit

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2019
Messages
443
Location
Isle of Wight
There are many tourist walks/cycle ways in the West Highlands these days which rely on such stations being kept open, these tourist ways etc, being (in many cases) the original routes that the Army marched from Scotland to all parts South in years past, long before any railway existed in the area, but the very reason these routes exist today.

Most notably, the West Highland Way, which has become extremely popular in recent years, passes through Tyndrum on its way from Milngavie to Fort William. There must be a lot of walkers who make a planned or unplanned stop there. If you are tired and/or wet I don’t think you would care which of the stations you used to escape, and would be glad that trains on both lines stopped there.

The Tyndrum stations are also used as jumping-off points for the surrounding hills. I have vivid memories of the Lower station where a friend and I parked when climbing Ben Lui. After a long but rewarding expedition we returned to discover that my friend had lost his car keys on the mountain. We then became very familiar with the limited amenities of the station for a couple of hours while waiting for the AA to come and open up the car. The midges didn’t help.

Incidentally, the passenger statistics show that usage of the stations is roughly equal - 4,000+ each pa. So if there was a move to ’rationalise’ it would be hard to decide which one to close.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top