anti-pacer
Established Member
Is your "local" TV news appropriate to you? Has the TV region changed over recent years. Do you live in a region not well covered by your supposedly local news?
In Scotland the ITV version for where I live covers an area that could best be describe as Grampian, Highland and Islands and the BBC one covers all of Scotland so neither of them are really "local" in the true sense of the word.
I've newer understood why Scotland; Wales and Northern Ireland get national news programs but not regional news ones and England gets regional news but not national news.
On the radio front, would a BBC Radio England station work?
I remember when Radio 1 evening show use to go to the nations every Thursday. England would get Zane Lowe who'd presented every other night of the week, where as the others would get different people.
I always felt the person covering England should be have been different too.
Is your "local" TV news appropriate to you? Has the TV region changed over recent years. Do you live in a region not well covered by your supposedly local news?
On the radio front, would a BBC Radio England station work?
I've newer understood why Scotland; Wales and Northern Ireland get national news programs but not regional news ones and England gets regional news but not national news.
On the radio front, would a BBC Radio England station work?
I remember when Radio 1 evening show use to go to the nations every Thursday. England would get Zane Lowe who'd presented every other night of the week, where as the others would get different people.
I always felt the person covering England should be have been different too.
Politics and population.
Wales didn't used to have a unified ITV region but the WG pushed for it.
Isn't the most Southern bit of Scotland still covered by ITV Border & Tyne Tees?
Scotland isn't any bigger than Yorkshire in population terms, so does it need to be split?
If anything you could argue Wales on it's own is too small to get it's own ITV region.
I get Midlands Today in Brum. Who'd have thunk it?
In Scotland the ITV version for where I live covers an area that could best be describe as Grampian, Highland and Islands and the BBC one covers all of Scotland so neither of them are really "local" in the true sense of the word.
Scotland isn't any bigger than Yorkshire in population terms, so does it need to be split?
The ITV/STV broadcasting areas can be broken up into "micro-regions" for advertising purposes so it would be technically possible to localise news broadcasts further. I'm not sure if the BBC would be able to do this.
Not sure there's enough news in Wales to merrit the cost of a dedicated channel.
Things do happen over here sometimes, you know! Maybe not a dedicated channel for Wales (well, aside from S4C of course), but I see no reason a Welsh news programme wouldn't work, bearing in mind that such a programme would be able to draw on the national content from the main BBC broadcast as appropriate (the pre-recorded segments would be ideal for this). It would mean that Welsh national issues devolved to the assembly could be given appropriate prominence, whilst filtering out the stuff that is completely irrelevant (people in Bangor have little interest in English education policy, for example).
Scotland's population is nearly twice the size of Wales. What services would you cut to fund more political assembly stuff (which I believe is nowhere near the scope of Scotland's powers). Would this just be an extended Wales bulletin? Would you replace the Six - baring in mind that it was found that the Six has enough news to be relevant to Scotland to keep it. If it's a new channel what else would it be filled with? If not replacing the Six, and keeping the 1830 program, what would you remove? Eastenders? The One Show? A Wales only slot on BBC2? How about a red-button only option on the Six?
I'd replace the 6pm news with an hour long show in both Scotland and Wales. This would take a lot of content from the main BBC news programme (recorded interviews and news segments and the like), with the editorial stance focussed on the Scottish/Welsh audience. So major news in Health and Education would get relative priority, while relatively minor things from England that are less relevant would get a lower billing, or cut altogether. It would be a relatively low cost solution, in that the major and international stories would still be covered by one national reporting team who send their footage to the Scottish and Welsh programmes in addition to broadcasting it in England. (There's little point in sending multiple journalists to cover a US presidential event, for example). This would obviously be a mutual thing too; if there was a major event in Edinburgh, this could be covered by the Scottish news team and sent around the UK.

Do any Mancunians ever watch Channel 7 on Freeview which appears to carry much in the way of news specific to Manchester.
... When you look at STV's plans for STV Aberdeen, Dundee and Ayr (yes, really, Ayr is going to have its own TV channel), I have to wonder quite how much there is at the bottom of the barrel to scrape.
I live in Lowestoft. We get Look East, which isn't too bad, covers most local stuff as the region is split into two (East/West) however, on a Sunday at least I find that they just do one programme for the region and we get stuff from Northampton way.
We also get updates when the West Coast Mainline Through Milton Keynes is disrupted which amuses me as when you think of East Anglia, it's not the first rail line that comes to mind!