danielnez1
Member
Class 305/307/308 refurbishments may count (removal of compartments and fitting of gangways) : http://citytransport.info/Compartment.htm
Converting class 306 units from DC to AC was a bit of a rebuild. Moved the guards brake and pantograph to a different coach.
Less said about the class 309 refurb the better. Still nice units but in their original condition there was nothing finer.
What refurbs and mods have made the biggest change to a train, either for the better or for the worse?
I think the Scotrail 156 refurb might be in with a shout. Huge downgrade in passenger experience with the ironing boards, and also the replacement of the entire toilet cubicle, interior repaint and PIS.
Won’t take the title for most changes, however WAGN’s class 317/2 refurbishment was fairly extensive. New interior and seats, first class moved. Not a bad refurbishment, a shame only 24 were done.
The 317s refurbished for Stansted Express went a bit further.
Yes, I remember those. Didn't they end up with an interior that was almost identical to a 365.
In a similar vein, the "Turbomotive" 46202 converted to a piston-engined "Princess" in 1952 (and written off in the Harrow disaster a few months later)LMSR "Fury" high-pressure 4-6-0 steam loco with parallel boiler converted into the first "Rebuilt Scot" with taper boiler, LMS 6170/BR 46170, "British Legion"
Have you been on a 156 since the upgrades? They're quite a lot better now.What refurbs and mods have made the biggest change to a train, either for the better or for the worse?
I think the Scotrail 156 refurb might be in with a shout. Huge downgrade in passenger experience with the ironing boards, and also the replacement of the entire toilet cubicle, interior repaint and PIS.
Plus the 86s. Weren't there some 03s exported that ended up with hydraulic transmission and a Deutz engine? Definitely been some drastic rebuilds abroad where just frame and bogies used, rest is new.The class 87s that were exported to Bulgaria now look completely different.
Been on a Northern one since the upgrade, which was the same as ScotRail but retaining the original seats because Northern are cheapskates. It's definitely a downgrade.Have you been on a 156 since the upgrades? They're quite a lot better now.
Nowhere near being the most changed, though, and I’d say they don’t look completely different: they’re still easily recognisable as an 87.The class 87s that were exported to Bulgaria now look completely different.
What refurbs and mods have made the biggest change to a train, either for the better or for the worse?
I think the Scotrail 156 refurb might be in with a shout. Huge downgrade in passenger experience with the ironing boards, and also the replacement of the entire toilet cubicle, interior repaint and PIS.
However, over in the 484 thread the view (based on information from SWR PR so far) seems to be that the interiors will hardly be changed at all?Also D78 to 484
Err, as detailed in my post #23In a similar vein, the "Turbomotive" 46202 converted to a piston-engined "Princess" in 1952 (and written off in the Harrow disaster a few months later)
The HST MTU re-power was really only engine and cooler group and was less extensive than Class 57, 56 to 69 and 73/9 rebuilds. The HST MTU programme was no more extensive than the VP185 programme though cooler groups could be done separately for that.Loco Class: 57/3/6 and MTU powered HST
The class 307 driving trailers converted into PCVs (Propelling Control Vehicles) for mail trains was quite a change.Class 305/307/308 refurbishments may count (removal of compartments and fitting of gangways) : http://citytransport.info/Compartment.htm