Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Plus with those mentioned, there are very different intermediate stops which are arguably where the primary flows are (excepting GWR to Devon/Cornwall) and aren't the same routes, only final destinations or share very small sections of track.
CrossCountry and GWR on the corridor to and from Banbury & Reading and Penzance & Bristol Temple Meads, TPExpress, LNER and CrossCountry to and from Leeds / York and Edinburgh - LNER when running the 07:10ish from Leeds to Aberdeen and 18:18 from Aberdeen to Edinburgh.
There's several more I could list but it'll take me a while to list them.
Transport for Wales and West Midlands Trains both run between Birmingham and Shrewsbury, although Transport for Wales services are limited stop whereas West Midlands Trains serve all stations.
Avanti share their route entirely with other operators.
Euston - Birmingham/Trent Valley - Liverpool with LNWR
Coventry - Birmingham - Crewe with XC
Crewe /Stoke - Manchester with XC & Northern
Crewe - Chester & beyond with TfW
As stated above Wigan / Preston - Glasgow / Edinburgh with TPE.
Wigan - /Blackpool Oxenholme with Northern (albeit different Northern services).
Euston - Glasgow / Edinburgh with Caledonian Sleeper
I'm sure there are more with Avanti alone.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
LNER share their route with:
GC from King's Cross to Northallerton
HT from King's Cross to Doncaster
Great Northern from King's Cross to Peterborough
EMR from Peterborough to Grantham, Doncaster to Leeds, and Doncaster to York
Northern from Doncaster to Leeds / Skipton / Harrogate
XC from Leeds/ Doncaster to Aberdeen
TPE from Leeds to Edinburgh
Northern from Darlington - Alnmouth
Scotrail from Dunbar - Aberdeen/Inverness
Caledonian Sleeper from Edinburgh - Aberdeen/Inverness
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
TPE only are the sole operator on the line between York and Seamer (for now).
Everywhere else is shared with at least one of Northern, LNER or Avanti.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Hull Trains shares its route entirely with LNER
GC shares its route with LNER, TPE and Northern on the Sunderland leg, and LNER and partially northern on the Bradford leg.
Merseyrail, as far as I am aware do not share their route with anyone. I'm not sure if any other TOC is in this position?
XC shares its route in far too many places to count. It shares its route with Scotrail, Avanti, Caledonian Sleeper, LNER, TPE, GC, HT, Northern, EMR, WMT/LNER, GWR, SWT, AGA, TSGN, TfW. That's 15 ToCs and I presume that is the maximum.
Avanti share their route entirely with other operators.
Euston - Birmingham/Trent Valley - Liverpool with LNWR
Coventry - Birmingham - Crewe with XC
Crewe /Stoke - Manchester with XC & Northern
Crewe - Chester & beyond with TfW
As stated above Wigan / Preston - Glasgow / Edinburgh with TPE.
Wigan - /Blackpool Oxenholme with Northern (albeit different Northern services).
Euston - Glasgow / Edinburgh with Caledonian Sleeper
I'm sure there are more with Avanti alone.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
LNER share their route with:
GC from King's Cross to Northallerton
HT from King's Cross to Doncaster
Great Northern from King's Cross to Peterborough
EMR from Peterborough to Grantham, Doncaster to Leeds, and Doncaster to York
Northern from Doncaster to Leeds / Skipton / Harrogate
XC from Leeds/ Doncaster to Aberdeen
TPE from Leeds to Edinburgh
Northern from Darlington - Alnmouth
Scotrail from Dunbar - Aberdeen/Inverness
Caledonian Sleeper from Edinburgh - Aberdeen/Inverness
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
TPE only are the sole operator on the line between York and Seamer (for now).
Everywhere else is shared with at least one of Northern, LNER or Avanti.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Hull Trains shares its route entirely with LNER
GC shares its route with LNER, TPE and Northern on the Sunderland leg, and LNER and partially northern on the Bradford leg.
Merseyrail, as far as I am aware do not share their route with anyone. I'm not sure if any other TOC is in this position?
XC shares its route in far too many places to count. It shares its route with Scotrail, Avanti, Caledonian Sleeper, LNER, TPE, GC, HT, Northern, EMR, WMT/LNER, GWR, SWT, AGA, TSGN, TfW. That's 15 ToCs and I presume that is the maximum.
If you could be bothered, I believe it would be legal to string together a GWR/XC train from Exeter to Bristol, a GWR train from Bristol to Newport, a TfW train to Shrewsbury, and a WMT/TfW train to Birmingham. So in that sense, GWR/TfW is in competition with XC for Exeter to Birmingham traffic
This is shared by TPE from York to Northallerton (and then the same track used to Eaglescliffe but not the same calls).
GC overlaps with the Metro for a couple of hundred yards just south of Sunderland station but again doesn't share any calls.
One of the few flows where genuine competition seems to exist, especially between Avanti and Chiltern. Depending on where the origin / destination is in London Chiltern can be as quick if not quicker
Depends what level you count, I suppose! Skipton and Bradford FS have one LNER train a day in each direction but is this really enough to count as competition for Northern, who run every other service?
I think you will find that one of the principles of privatisation in the form adopted was that it was a way to enable Government to fund a loss-making industry in a financially transparent manner so meeting the EU requirements for state aid to private industry.
You are quite wrong in suggesting that on-rail competition was intended to reduce fares on certain traffic flows. The competition was for the franchises, with the aim of reducing the global subsidy. In turn this may have had some effect on fares, but as from the beginning of privatisation the Government had always controlled the levels of key fares wide scale fare cutting was never going to happen.
In the foreword to the White Paper, New Opportunities for the Railways: ‘more competition, greater efficiency and a wider choice of services more closely tailored to what customers want’.
Competition usually either provides an increased customer experience for the same price as before, or provides the same customer experience for a lower price.
One of the effects of "competitive" routes is they take a disproportionate share of capacity and management attention, just to scoop revenue off the other operator.
For example, the East Coast runs from London to Edinburgh. But the West Coast has got into the act, not by direct services as they don't have any, but by their through-routed trains via Birmingham, on which they employ substantial marketing effort, to the extent of selling first class advances at pretty much what the ECML operator is charging for standard. This is great, it means when one of these through trains comes into Birmingham New Street it's already pretty full in First Class, and those there travelling back from business meetings to Preston, or (me) Carlisle where there is no competition find there are no such seats left, despite having paid a substantial multiple of those making the full journey. I do accept that if there's a trainload already waiting to travel from Birmingham and I don't get sat down, that's tough. What is less reasonable is that accommodation provided for this has already been given out to quite a different flow, already catered for elsewhere on the franchised railway. Furthermore there appears to be no capacity control on these tickets, they seem to happily fully fill up the accommodation with them. It is notably concealed that such services take much longer than the direct service. Sure it's in there somewhere, but not obvious to the casual user.
Same elsewhere. Chiltern put so much effort into ORCATS-raiding GWR on Oxford to London, while continuing to send out short formations such that those from High Wycombe etc boarding find there are no seats left.
I think there's a perception that mainstream flows at TOCs are pretty much a sure thing, once you have won the franchise, and you don't have to bother too much about them any more. It's the extra, over and above the franchise, that has the interest.
Thameslink also covers part of the same route - London Bridge to Norwood Jcn, and the route is served by TfL and Southern.
Thameslink goes on to serve East Croydon alongside Southern services and then out to Horsham, which is also served by Southern.
Most posts have missed the stipulation that they need to both be end to end services between A and B.
Using that rule I offer:
Bradford to London (LNER and GC)
Leeds to London (LNER and East Midlands whatever they call themselves now)
Birmingham to London (Avant and Chiltern)
Inverness/Aberdeen to London (LNER and Caledonian Sleeper)
Most posts have missed the stipulation that they need to both be end to end services between A and B.
Using that rule I offer:
Bradford to London (LNER and GC)
Leeds to London (LNER and East Midlands whatever they call themselves now)
Birmingham to London (Avant and Chiltern)
Inverness/Aberdeen to London (LNER and Caledonian Sleeper)
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.
