This Saturday I wish to make a three-legged journey, firstly from Cambridge to Reading (CBG-RDG), then from Reading to Henley-on-Thames (RDG-HOT), and then Henley-on-Thames back to Cambridge (HOT-CBG).
Afer playing around a bit with National Rail Enquiries, I saw that London Terminals to HOT via RDG tickets exist, which seem to be just what I need. Checking on brfares.com showed these also exist from Boundary Zone 6. This leads me to believe that the following is a valid ticket combination for my journey, and is the cheapest I can find (all prices include Network Railcard discount):
* CBG to London day return + Travelcard: £14.85
* BZ6 - HOT day return, route Any Permitted: £6.85
* Excess outward leg of BZ6 - HOT to be via Reading, costing half the difference: (£11.15-£6.85)/2 = £2.15
Total cost = £23.85
Firstly, the simple questions: Am I correct to say that this is valid? Am I using/calculating excess fares correctly? And am I allowed to excess the BZ6-HOT ticket at the same time as buying it?
Secondly, the hard questions: I made the mistake of trying to understand *why* the London (or BZ6) to HOT, via RDG, is a valid route, which led to a whole can of worms that I now wish I hadn't opened!
To start with, the route clearly has a double-back between Twyford and Reading, something which I thought wasn't allowed? I can't find any easement in the routeing guide to allow it, so why is it allowed?
I dug deeper into the routeing guide, initially using an old copy of the instructions that I had saved on my computer (from before the currently published version dated 26th August). This states that "where the fare specifies a particular route, you may choose only those routes listed in the guide which pass through the station shown in the route description". Now since there are no routes on a London to Henley ticket which pass through Reading, the logical conclusion is that I'm not allowed to choose any routes at all on a London to Henley via Reading ticket! This of course begs the question of why the ticket exists at all if it can't be used on any valid route, so what am I missing?
In the latest published (26th August) version of the instructions, the sentence I quoted has been replaced with "where the fare specifies a particular route, there will be restrictions in the fares route data that will affect the routes listed in the guide which pass through the station shown in the route description". I don't really understand what this is going on about - is the "fares route data" referring to the fares check rule for choosing routeing points? Or something else? Either way, I don't see how it helps, because no route in the guide for London-HOT passes through Reading in the first place, so such a route can't be affected by the fares route data, whatever it is!
Although I'm happy to travel on my suggested tickets based on the route offered by National Rail Enquiries (which seems to be perfectly sensible from a purely common-sense perspective), I'd really like to understand why it's valid, and would be grateful if anybody could explain.
Afer playing around a bit with National Rail Enquiries, I saw that London Terminals to HOT via RDG tickets exist, which seem to be just what I need. Checking on brfares.com showed these also exist from Boundary Zone 6. This leads me to believe that the following is a valid ticket combination for my journey, and is the cheapest I can find (all prices include Network Railcard discount):
* CBG to London day return + Travelcard: £14.85
* BZ6 - HOT day return, route Any Permitted: £6.85
* Excess outward leg of BZ6 - HOT to be via Reading, costing half the difference: (£11.15-£6.85)/2 = £2.15
Total cost = £23.85
Firstly, the simple questions: Am I correct to say that this is valid? Am I using/calculating excess fares correctly? And am I allowed to excess the BZ6-HOT ticket at the same time as buying it?
Secondly, the hard questions: I made the mistake of trying to understand *why* the London (or BZ6) to HOT, via RDG, is a valid route, which led to a whole can of worms that I now wish I hadn't opened!
To start with, the route clearly has a double-back between Twyford and Reading, something which I thought wasn't allowed? I can't find any easement in the routeing guide to allow it, so why is it allowed?
I dug deeper into the routeing guide, initially using an old copy of the instructions that I had saved on my computer (from before the currently published version dated 26th August). This states that "where the fare specifies a particular route, you may choose only those routes listed in the guide which pass through the station shown in the route description". Now since there are no routes on a London to Henley ticket which pass through Reading, the logical conclusion is that I'm not allowed to choose any routes at all on a London to Henley via Reading ticket! This of course begs the question of why the ticket exists at all if it can't be used on any valid route, so what am I missing?
In the latest published (26th August) version of the instructions, the sentence I quoted has been replaced with "where the fare specifies a particular route, there will be restrictions in the fares route data that will affect the routes listed in the guide which pass through the station shown in the route description". I don't really understand what this is going on about - is the "fares route data" referring to the fares check rule for choosing routeing points? Or something else? Either way, I don't see how it helps, because no route in the guide for London-HOT passes through Reading in the first place, so such a route can't be affected by the fares route data, whatever it is!
Although I'm happy to travel on my suggested tickets based on the route offered by National Rail Enquiries (which seems to be perfectly sensible from a purely common-sense perspective), I'd really like to understand why it's valid, and would be grateful if anybody could explain.
Last edited: