• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Tree Stumps Left to Re-Grow

Status
Not open for further replies.

Envoy

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2014
Messages
3,126
I see that where large trees are felled near tracks, that they are not injected with poison to kill them off. I notice that new grow is growing from the stumps that have been left behind following felling. Surely this is just making work for the future along with the problem of leaves causing traction issues? I can understand why the tree roots are not ripped from the ground as this would cause erosion issues.

I also see that felled timber is left the side of rail tracks. Surely, such timber could be lifted onto flat wagons and taken away and sold - even if just for firewood? See attached photo:>
 

Attachments

  • GWML Plymouth Woods.jpeg
    GWML Plymouth Woods.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 159
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
6,851
I also see that felled timber is left the side of rail tracks. Surely, such timber could be lifted onto flat wagons and taken away and sold - even if just for firewood? See attached photo:>
The majority is removed/chipped. What's mainly left behind is deliberately left for ecological reasons i.e. to provide habitats.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,482
Location
Northampton
I see that where large trees are felled near tracks, that they are not injected with poison to kill them off. I notice that new grow is growing from the stumps that have been left behind following felling. Surely this is just making work for the future along with the problem of leaves causing traction issues? I can understand why the tree roots are not ripped from the ground as this would cause erosion issues.
Injecting the tree with poison would have significant ecological risks. Given that *something* will grow back, letting the tree send up shoots again and coming back in a year to hack it all back down again is a lesser evil.
I also see that felled timber is left the side of rail tracks. Surely, such timber could be lifted onto flat wagons and taken away and sold - even if just for firewood? See attached photo:>
The cost of recovering and selling the wood would far outweigh any revenue from a timber merchant. NR leaves the wood stacked up for invertebrates and other woodland creatures to use.
 

LUYMun

Established Member
Joined
15 Jul 2018
Messages
1,381
Location
Cancelled
Removing the tree stump would also cause issues with land and soil stability, resulting in erosion.
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
3,278
Location
East Midlands
Apart from the other negatives of poisoning them, in the cases where the tree roots are holding an embankment together, maybe you really need them to not just remain in place, but actually stay alive in order to remain effective?
 

tumbledown

Member
Joined
5 Nov 2024
Messages
272
Location
UK
The usual treatment to prevent regrowth of stumps is injection of fungal spores under the bark, which doesn't endanger intact trees or other species.
 

Pacef8

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2020
Messages
479
Location
Wirral
After a talk with the woodland trust and a senior rail-track employee blue nails that they hammer into the stumps are now banned . I mention this as i saw them being used on the last cutback on a embankment in port sunlight .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top