• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Travelling off route..

Status
Not open for further replies.

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,821
This is from MSE where there seems to be conflicting views on what shouldve happened
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=3044108
On Tuesday I travelled to Lancaster to Winchester with an open return I'd bought on thetrainline.com. I hadn't noticed that the return ticket said via Banbury. It was in small print and it hadn't occurred to me that my return would be restricted to a certain route.

I went from Winchester to Waterloo, where I intended to take the tube to Euston. My ticket wouldn't let me through the barriers but the first ticket inspector just let me through. The next one told me to buy a tube ticket (£4) - I couldn't understand this but I bought it. Then when it came to take a train from Euston to Lancaster the Virgin ticket checkers told me my ticket wasn't valid for their train and so I had to buy a new ticket for just over £50.

I'm frustrated that the ticket the trainline sold me was actually a restricted return. But I've a feeling I don't have a leg to stand on here. Is there anyone I could complain to on this one or would I be wasting my time?

Now im not too sure what the guard shouldve done here - excessed it from Winchester to a via London ticket or was right in giving the person involved a new ticket..

Alas not being at work i cant check whether the excess wouldve been the same price as the single nor do i have any fares manuals at hand.. s
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,820
Location
Back office
Change of route excess is the correct course of action. Penalty Fares or singles to/from where you've "deviated" from the line of route are incorrect.
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,821
Ahh but look at what the journey entailed - outward journey routed one way and back another via Banbury - now if they were advance singles then the guard would not have been able to excess it up would he/her?
 

FGWman

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2010
Messages
177
Well looking at the fares manual an Anytime return from Lancaster to Winchester via banbury is £175.00. An anytime return any permitted is £353.00. When changing route you pay half the difference which would have been £89.00.

Again looking at the manual a Off peak single from London to Lancaster is £76.50 which is cheaper and the guard could have sold her. However the OP says she was only charged £50.00 so it looks like the guard has undercharged her !!
 

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
The traveller should have been given an excess to the fare valid by that route. The single fare is only officially an option if no through fare is valid by that route.

The guard probably sold the traveller an Off-Peak Single (SVS) from London to Stafford (£51.80)

Ahh but look at what the journey entailed - outward journey routed one way and back another via Banbury - now if they were advance singles then the guard would not have been able to excess it up would he/her?

It's not the same thing.
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,461
Well looking at the fares manual an Anytime return from Lancaster to Winchester via banbury is £175.00. An anytime return any permitted is £353.00. When changing route you pay half the difference which would have been £89.00.

Why an Anytime Return? Although I can't check for now, I doubt that she would have been sold an Anytime Return as I hardly believe that a Lancaster - Winchester Off-Peak Return would have a big restriction on it. More likely to be "valid after 0500" or something similar.

Again looking at the manual a Off peak single from London to Lancaster is £76.50 which is cheaper and the guard could have sold her. However the OP says she was only charged £50.00 so it looks like the guard has undercharged her !!

It sounds about right with railcard discount applied.
 

34D

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2011
Messages
6,044
Location
Yorkshire
Well looking at the fares manual an Anytime return from Lancaster to Winchester via banbury is £175.00. An anytime return any permitted is £353.00. When changing route you pay half the difference which would have been £89.00.

Again looking at the manual a Off peak single from London to Lancaster is £76.50 which is cheaper and the guard could have sold her. However the OP says she was only charged £50.00 so it looks like the guard has undercharged her !!

I don't see why a ticket to Lancaster would have been needed. By my logic, (subject to her trains' calls) all that would have been needed is a Euston-Nuneaton ticket. Was this train really first stop Lancaster? Or possibly Rugby - I'm not sure whether Winchester-Reading-Banbury-Cov-Rugby-Lancaster would be valid or not without further checking.
 

embers25

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2009
Messages
2,162
Obviously we don't have the full facts here but the Stafford ticket seems to match up well with the info. Rugby or Nuneaton may be valid though unlikely (haven't checked the routeing guide) but if the ticket collector decided that Stafford was the first place back on route that is not that bad. Also given most Lancaster trains are non-stop to Warrington and certainly very few stop at Rugby or Nuneaton then Stafford may well have been fortunate as it's likely the single should have been to Warrington being as this was the first stop.

To answer the forum question though, no they have no grounds to complain as it was their error and their responsibility to read the ticket. Whilst many routeings are vague even when printed on the ticket this one is about as clear as it gets. Arguing that the text was small is a joke really as you could use that argument to claim you couldn't read STD on the ticket and so travel in 1st (I know the STD is printed bigger).
 

LexyBoy

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
4,478
Location
North of the rivers
Seems to me...

1) He's stated that it was an 'open return'. I reckon he went via Banbury on the outbound (and therefore didn't notice the routeing) and via London on the return. This is perfectly reasonable if he just looked up the train times for the times he was wanting to travel, as both are comparable in time.

2) When told the ticket wasn't valid, I think he may have just bought himself a new ticket for Euston-Lancaster. If he did explain what had happened at the ticket office then I'd be shocked that he wasn't sold an excess, but most likely wasn't aware that this is possible (along with most of the MSE posters it would seem)

3) Most likely he was on an Off-Peak Return, which would be valid via London anyway as it's more expensive than the +Any Permitted!

I would ask (a) what exactly the ticket was; (b) what happened at Euston - did they ask for a ticket to Lancaster or explain the situation?

It's disappointing to see so many posts on MSE saying that they should have read the T&Cs and their ticket was totally invalid :roll:

edit: for point 2, I'm guessing that he was turned away at the barriers at Euston rather than on the train. If it were on board, the guard should have excessed (or sold an undiscounted SOS if they didn't know what they were doing)
 
Last edited:

34D

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2011
Messages
6,044
Location
Yorkshire
Seems to me...

1) He's stated that it was an 'open return'. I reckon he went via Banbury on the outbound (and therefore didn't notice the routeing) and via London on the return. This is perfectly reasonable if he just looked up the train times for the times he was wanting to travel, as both are comparable in time.

2) When told the ticket wasn't valid, I think he may have just bought himself a new ticket for Euston-Lancaster. If he did explain what had happened at the ticket office then I'd be shocked that he wasn't sold an excess, but most likely wasn't aware that this is possible (along with most of the MSE posters it would seem)

3) Most likely he was on an Off-Peak Return, which would be valid via London anyway as it's more expensive than the +Any Permitted!

I would ask (a) what exactly the ticket was; (b) what happened at Euston - did they ask for a ticket to Lancaster or explain the situation?

It's disappointing to see so many posts on MSE saying that they should have read the T&Cs and their ticket was totally invalid :roll:

edit: for point 2, I'm guessing that he was turned away at the barriers at Euston rather than on the train. If it were on board, the guard should have excessed (or sold an undiscounted SOS if they didn't know what they were doing)

Opinions invited whether (at point 2) he could have walked to Marylebone and boarded a train for the midlands there?
 

LexyBoy

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
4,478
Location
North of the rivers
Opinions invited whether (at point 2) he could have walked to Marylebone and boarded a train for the midlands there?

It's via Banbury so I would guess it would have to be valid? Unless perhaps WIN-BAN isn't valid via London?

I've had a look and a Lancaster-Winchester SVR is valid on any train departing at or after 0415, so it must have been an Off-Peak ticket. The via London ticket has restriction code 3A so as long as the journey was within the times specified he should have been sold an excess.
 

Paul Kelly

Verified Rep - BR Fares
Joined
16 Apr 2010
Messages
4,228
Location
Reading
3) Most likely he was on an Off-Peak Return, which would be valid via London anyway as it's more expensive than the +Any Permitted!

If this is true, then the fact that the (70p more expensive) route BANBURY SVR is valid on any train from 0415 onwards could be a nice way of working around the restrictions on arrival time into London on the route +LONDON SVR?
 
Last edited:

LexyBoy

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
4,478
Location
North of the rivers
... also to correct my earlier post there is no +Any Permitted fare for this route (SVR), only London or Banbury. Somewhat annoying considering the two routes are very similar in time.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
If this is true, then the fact that the (70p more expensive) route BANBURY SVR is valid on any train from 0415 onwards could be a nice way of working around the restrictions on arrival time into London on the route +LONDON SVR?

Sorry, I wasn't really thinking that through fully. Since the Banbury fare is more expensive, there would be a zero excess to change to a +London SVR. The ticket would then be a +London SVR and the same restrictions would apply - travelling earlier than allowed would mean it should be excessed to a +London SOR (or I think half the excess for a single leg).
 
Last edited:

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
It's via Banbury so I would guess it would have to be valid? Unless perhaps WIN-BAN isn't valid via London?....

The Winchester-Banbury fare/routeing has nothing to do with the routeing from Winchester to Lancaster or vice-versa.

If this is true, then the fact that the (70p more expensive) route BANBURY SVR is valid on any train from 0415 onwards could be a nice way of working around the restrictions on arrival time into London on the route +LONDON SVR?

If the rte Banbury ticket is used on a route via London (and not Banbury) at a time when the rte London SVR is not valid, the rte Banbury SVR would likely not be valid either as it would be compared to the SOR/SDR fare. instead.
 

LexyBoy

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
4,478
Location
North of the rivers
The Winchester-Banbury fare/routeing has nothing to do with the routeing from Winchester to Lancaster or vice-versa.

No, that's what I thought. So unless there's something in the Routeing Guide to prevent the route via MYB and BAN then it would be valid (and should be accepted on the Underground, probably necessitating plenty of arguing about that little +).
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,461
If the rte Banbury ticket is used on a route via London (and not Banbury) at a time when the rte London SVR is not valid, the rte Banbury SVR would likely not be valid either as it would be compared to the SOR/SDR fare. instead.

My understanding from previous discussions is that the SVR would have to be excessed to SOR first (change of ticket type - full difference) then the return leg is excessed to the appropriate route (off-route excess - half difference). Of course that was the documented process for the old version.

The new mechanism brought in in September(?) I believe have complicated things non-end.
 

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
What I mean is...

If you travel via London (not Banbury) at a time when the rte London SVR is valid, but the rte Banbury ticket is more expensive then it is valid. But when the rte London SVR is not valid, the cheapest ticket to compare with is the SOR, which will surely be more expensive than the rte Banbury SVR, thus making it invalid.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,339
Location
Yorkshire
The customer says they had an "open return". Is that the SOR, formerly Standard Open Return and now called Anytime Return? The term Open used to mean "Valid for 1 month and valid on any train" however Thetrainline muddied the waters from around 1999 and used the term to mean that it was a walk-on ticket. If they mean thetrainline definition, the ticket could be an SVR, formerly Saver Return, now called Off Peak Return.

We do not know what train the customer caught.

If the customer held an Anytime Return route Banbury, priced at £175.00 and travelled on a train from Euston on which an Off Peak Return route +London was not permitted, then the excess would be half the huge difference in fares, ((353.00-175.00)/2 = £89.00).

However if they held an Anytime return route Banbury, priced at £175.00 and travelled on a train from Euston on which an Off Peak Return route +London was permitted, then the excess would be zero as the customer already has a ticket that costs more than the appropriate ticket for that route. Note however that some railway staff do not like issuing excess fares; that's their problem though, not the customers.

However if they held an Off Peak Return route Banbury, priced at £98.00 and travelled on a train from Euston on which an Off Peak Return route +London was not permitted, then the excess would be half the huge difference in fares, ((353.00-98.70)/2 = £127.15)

However if they held an Off Peak Return route Banbury, priced at £98.00 and travelled on a train from Euston on which an Off Peak Return route +London was permitted, then the excess would be half the tiny difference in fares, ((98.70-98.70)/2 = £00.35).
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I'd also like to add that if the customer was travelling on a train for which an Off Peak Rte +London was not valid, and the train was not a fast to Warrington train, then it would be cheaper to sell an Anytime ticket to the next station.

The first station which is definitely valid would be Nuneaton, the SOS is £65. Rugby might be valid, which would be £58.00. Tamworth would be £76.50, Stafford £93.00 etc. It is possible the guard sold the ticket to Rugby on the basis that the RG may (I've not checked) well permit Winchester-Coventry-Rugby-Lancaster. Also while the train should really call at the station where you change from one ticket to the next, the guard could have been lenient.

The charge of "just over £50" sounds like a fair outcome if the customer had departed Euston before 0905.

If the customer had departed Euston at or after 0905 then they have been overcharged and a complaint should be made.

As you say you don't have a leg to stand on. It would have been on the terms when you booked the ticket.

Sadly this is the sort of absolute gibberish that you can sometimes get on MSE by a minority of people who post incorrect info as fact, despite knowing absolutely nothing about the subject, whatsoever!
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
Sadly this is the sort of absolute gibberish that you can sometimes get on MSE by a minority of people who post incorrect info as fact, despite knowing absolutely nothing about the subject, whatsoever!
Kinda like here sometimes :p (with certain honourable exceptions!)
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,339
Location
Yorkshire
Kinda like here sometimes :p (with certain honourable exceptions!)
When it comes to opinions and general posts, yes, but far less so when it comes to fares advice, in general the people who post fares advice here tend to know their stuff! Of course not everyone can know everything but you don't tend to see here people saying things that are totally and utterly untrue when it comes to fares information.

Anyway for the avoidance of doubt the rules are:

East Coast Revenue Protection Handbook said:
C7.1.1. Travel by a Different Route - with a higher fare

Return Tickets - Travel in one direction

Ticket held:
Standard Anytime / Day Return
First Anytime / Day Return
Off-peak Return / Day Return
Super Off-Peak Return
Weekender Return

Action:
Charge half the difference between the fare paid
and the appropriate Return fare for the journey
being made. If no through fare, charge the
appropriate Single fare for the part of the journey
not covered by the ticket held.

Also another TOC provided this:

Travel by a different route with a higher fare– Opportunity to buy before boarding

Return Tickets (Standard & First Class)
a) Travel in One Direction

Charge HALF the difference between the fare paid and the appropriate Return fare for the journey being made
If no through fare, charge the appropriate Single fare for the part of the journey not covered by the ticket

Notes:
Railcard discounts are allowed provided the original ticket is discounted;

Reference to 'appropriate fare' means the cheapest Single or Return fare available for immediate travel on the chosen service.
Important notes (myth-busters!)
- The excess is the same regardless of whether there was or was not opportunity to buy before boarding, there is NO penalty for buying on board
- Railcard discounts ARE allowed (providing original ticket has a Railcard discount)
- The full difference is not charged. HALF the difference is charged
- The excess is to the APPROPRIATE fare, that means (Super) Off Peak (Day) where valid. It does NOT mean the excess has to be to an Anytime, even if the original ticket is an anytime (there is an example in The Manual of a Not London Anytime ticket being excessed to a Super Off Peak valid via London)

Routeing Guide has this to say
http://www.atoc.org/clientfiles/File/RSPDocuments/instructions.pdf
Where two or more permitted routes are available for a specific journey, customers may wish to travel out by one route and return by another. If a higher fare applies for the return leg of the journey the customer should be issued with a ticket for the more direct route and an excess fare issued to cover the difference in fare for the return routeing. This option should be made available to customers who wish to pre-book a dual routed ticket prior to travel.
Sadly Thetrainline will not offer this option, a ticket office would need to be sell the ticket to do that at the time of purchase (a ticket office wouldn't charge Thetrainline's awful fees either).

The NR CoC has this to say
http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/system/galleries/download/misc/NRCOC.pdf
13 (e) If you make your journey by a route other than those referred to in (a) and (b)
above, you will be liable to pay an excess fare. This excess fare will be the
difference between the price paid for the ticket you hold and the price of the
lowest priced ticket(s) available for immediate travel that would have entitled you
to travel by that route.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
The OP has provided info as follows:

(All prices are with a 16-25 railcard which was held by the OP)

Original ticket held:
Lancaster to Winchester SVR Rte Banbury £64.70
Correct excess:
Lancaster to Winchester SVR Rte +London £0.25 (or is it 0.20? not sure if you round up or down)
Advice given by barrier staff at Euston:
New ticket London to Lancaster SVS Rte + London £50.50
For travel on 1S06 1930 EUS-GLC between EUS and LAN.

Therefore the OP was overcharged by approx £50.25 (I am not including the £4 LU fare).

This is absolutely absurd and inexcusable action by Virgin Trains ticket barrier staff. Not only did they ignore the rules of excessing, but also ignored the fact that the original ticket was valid from the first calling point, Warrington. Therefore the customer was only not valid between London and Warrington, not all the way to Lancaster. The price of making the ticket be valid was 25p not £50.

This is not the first time (by any means) we've had reports of awful barrier staff at Euston, and I fear it will not be the last, as Virgin appear to have taken insufficient steps to ensure that their staff are appropriately trained.

Virgin 100% to blame here for overcharging a customer by £50. I expect not just the money back but some compensation from Virgin for stress and inconvenience caused.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,270
I think you have the fares the wrong way round Yorkie. Unless NR's OJP is displaying it incorrectly, the Offpeak Return (SVR) is £98.70 route Banbury and £98.00 any permitted.

So a zero excess?

In fact looking back, LexyBoy already pointed this out on page 1
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,339
Location
Yorkshire
I think you have the fares the wrong way round Yorkie. Unless NR's OJP is displaying it incorrectly, the Offpeak Return (SVR) is £98.70 route Banbury and £98.00 any permitted.

So a zero excess?

In fact looking back, LexyBoy already pointed this out on page 1
Apologies, yes you are right. The excess is £0.00!
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
It is always worth asking for if a zero fares excess if changing trains tio prove that the conversation has been had. I seem to remember posts on here where guards have refused to accept tickets on the next train (Cardiff Valleys lines, ISTR) when the original guard asked had said "It's the same price, don't worry".
 

LexyBoy

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
4,478
Location
North of the rivers
It is always worth asking for if a zero fares excess if changing trains tio prove that the conversation has been had. I seem to remember posts on here where guards have refused to accept tickets on the next train (Cardiff Valleys lines, ISTR) when the original guard asked had said "It's the same price, don't worry".

I think that example involved an overdistance excess, in which case it's necessary to obtain the excess before embarking on the extra section, as otherwise effectively no ticket is held for that part. For change of route I'd agree that it's best to do it as early as possible, but not essential since the only action that can be taken is to excess the ticket en-route (unless I suppose the passenger was obviously trying to avoid it, hiding in the loo or the like).
 

Solent&Wessex

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2009
Messages
2,747
I have often issued zero fare excesses to people who are travelling on a different route or going slightly over distance where the original fare paid is the same or more than the fare for the new route. I don't see what the problem is.

I also regularly do "over distance" excess fares to save folk money. For example I had a passenger the other day with a ticket from Manchester to Leeds, but then asked to buy a single from Leeds to York. The passenger was using the return portion of an off peak return. Despite allegedly (in other topics) being one of the nasty commission hungry jobsworths, and the fact that the passenger just asked to purchase a single from Leeds to York I offered to do an over distance excess which was considerably cheaper than the cost of a new single fare. The passenger didn't even know you could do such a thing and was pleased.

Excess fares are not difficult although the training we get on them is minimal and as the various procedures and policies seem to change from place to place and year to year it is something which I think people shy away from.

We also have no info about the routeing guide or suchlike, and Avantix mobile journey enquiry doesn't use it, so again mistakes caused by ignorance are not uncommon.
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,461
I think that example involved an overdistance excess, in which case it's necessary to obtain the excess before embarking on the extra section, as otherwise effectively no ticket is held for that part.

A few days ago, I started off at Southampton Central and needed an over-distance excess for the return. On the way back the guard had already packed up his machine to go off duty at Soton so I couldn't get my excess before reaching back at my starting point. Luckily I had to change trains there and asked the FGW guard for my next leg if he would be happy to do it onboard. He just waved me on. He eventually let me off as he didn't have change for a fiver. :D

Seems a bit hit and miss with guards on this one from previous experience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top