• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Transport for Wales Class 231 / 756 Stadler FLIRTs

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,829
Yes indeed. Another thought - would track access charges reduce with a lower maximum speed ?. What are the maximum line speeds for the valleys etc anyway.
I've no idea on the impact of track access charges, but the top speed on the Valleys is 75mph. There's not much at that speed though.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,840
Location
Croydon
I wonder if it means they can eliminate a yaw damper somewhere? Like with the 458s, which had the yaw damper removed when they were re-geared to 75?
Ha ha, I can see it now. Use of 458s on the Portmouth direct postponed indefinitely as there are no Yaw Dampers available.
 

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,998
Will main line traincrew sign 756s? I'd guess not, so the question of borrowing them won't arise.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,829
won't the 231s and 756s be interchangeable for signing purposes?

I don't know, but maybe somebody else does?
TfW have stated that one of the benefits of using 231s on the Rhymney Valley now is the similarity for training purposes when the 756s arrive. They did say however that crews would need to undergo a short training course all the same, implying they will be separate for traction card purposes.

That said, the 756s are planned to work the Bridgend via VOG services, which are currently worked by Cardiff Mainline and Carmarthen crews between Cardiff and Bridgend. If that continues mainline crews will need to sign 756s regardless.
 

Jez

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2011
Messages
2,341
Location
Neath
TfW have stated that one of the benefits of using 231s on the Rhymney Valley now is the similarity for training purposes when the 756s arrive. They did say however that crews would need to undergo a short training course all the same, implying they will be separate for traction card purposes.

That said, the 756s are planned to work the Bridgend via VOG services, which are currently worked by Cardiff Mainline and Carmarthen crews between Cardiff and Bridgend. If that continues mainline crews will need to sign 756s regardless.
Do Carmarthen only sign that route so they can send the mainline trains via the VOG when there is engineering works between Cardiff and Bridgend?
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,829
Do Carmarthen only sign that route so they can send the mainline trains via the VOG when there is engineering works between Cardiff and Bridgend?
It's a handy diversion route - not just for planned engineering work but also frequently used for last minute disruption on the mainline. Pretty much everyone at TfW who signs West of Cardiff signs the VOG.
 

Chris217

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2018
Messages
646
I doubt it but i wonder if any 231s will ever work in pairs lol.
Going to Cardiff on Monday.
Judging by most of the positive remarks here,I might try and sample one of these.
Maybe sit myself near to the thrash cupboard
 

Jez

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2011
Messages
2,341
Location
Neath
It's a handy diversion route - not just for planned engineering work but also frequently used for last minute disruption on the mainline. Pretty much everyone at TfW who signs West of Cardiff signs the VOG.
it is but what i was wondering is do Carmarthen crews have any booked workings on the VOG or is simply for when disruption happenes. If they dont then i cant see them being trained on the FLIRTS as it would be 197s they would be running when diversions happened.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I doubt it but i wonder if any 231s will ever work in pairs lol.
Going to Cardiff on Monday.
Judging by most of the positive remarks here,I might try and sample one of these.
Maybe sit myself near to the thrash cupboard
I doubt they would ever work in pairs for 2 reasons. There are only 11 of them and they would be needed individually to cover all booked workings and they are already 4 carriages which would mean 8 carriages and likely a lot of platforms wouldn't have enough space.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,829
it is but what i was wondering is do Carmarthen crews have any booked workings on the VOG or is simply for when disruption happenes. If they dont then i cant see them being trained on the FLIRTS as it would be 197s they would be running when diversions happened.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
They have booked work - but only a small amount.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,840
Location
Croydon
I doubt it but i wonder if any 231s will ever work in pairs lol.
Going to Cardiff on Monday.
Judging by most of the positive remarks here,I might try and sample one of these.
Maybe sit myself near to the thrash cupboard
Thrash cupboard.
My granddaughter noticed the sign saying do not hang around in the corridor (or words to that effect).
I did'nt notice the sign :oops::so_O:E
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
2,642
Location
South Staffordshire
won't the 231s and 756s be interchangeable for signing purposes?

Would I be right in thinking the 756s have a different arrangement in the power wagon ? Back when the Stadlers came to Anglia I believe the 755/4s had four engines and the 755/3s two or maybe three engines.

IIRC the 231s are diesel only equivalents of the 755/4s with different bodyside furniture. The 756s are more complex in the power department with AC 25kV, batteries and diesel, so the crew would need a different knowledge to sign them
 

XAM2175

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2016
Messages
3,471
Location
Glasgow
Would I be right in thinking the 756s have a different arrangement in the power wagon ? Back when the Stadlers came to Anglia I believe the 755/4s had four engines and the 755/3s two or maybe three engines.
755/3s have two engines; /4s have four. 231s also have four. 756s have only one engine; the three other bays hold the batteries.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
6,035
Thrash cupboard.
My granddaughter noticed the sign saying do not hang around in the corridor (or words to that effect).
I did'nt notice the sign :oops::so_O:E

I like the English translation on the narrow gauge GTW's in Slovakia (which despite being pure electric have a power pack, I believe to reduce weight by the bodies not having to be strong enough to support equipment on the roof).

I may not remember entirely correctly, but it is something like "No riding in the lane on the run".
 

AlexNL

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2014
Messages
1,721
In a GTW, no matter if diesel or electric, all traction equipment is located in a power pack. The passenger coaches are unpowered.

I believe the idea behind this design is that it'd be possible to swap diesel for electrics at any point of the unit's life without having to make any changes to the passenger coaches, but I'm not aware of any GTW operator ever having done that.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,909
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
In a GTW, no matter if diesel or electric, all traction equipment is located in a power pack. The passenger coaches are unpowered.

I believe the idea behind this design is that it'd be possible to swap diesel for electrics at any point of the unit's life without having to make any changes to the passenger coaches, but I'm not aware of any GTW operator ever having done that.

It's a simpler design generally, with the powered bogie being under the power pack (making it more like a cabless short locomotive) and the trailers hung off it rather than articulated with it, which allows a longer low floor section than a FLIRT. It's a predecessor of the FLIRT, but it's really more like a tram or a fancy Pacer.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
6,035
It's a simpler design generally, with the powered bogie being under the power pack (making it more like a cabless short locomotive) and the trailers hung off it rather than articulated with it, which allows a longer low floor section than a FLIRT. It's a predecessor of the FLIRT, but it's really more like a tram or a fancy Pacer.

It also allows the saloon to extend to the cab so you can see out of the front/back, rather than having the area behind the cabs full of cabinets.

What I have read (and perhaps it is not correct) is that the power pack enables a low floor train while keeping heavy components floor mounted to give a lightweight design as the bodies don't have to support heavy roof mounted equipment. And that due to increasingly strict crash-worthiness requirements the weight of new designs has crept up until there is no benefit any more.

The standard gauge GTW's I've been on have certainly not felt like a tram or a Pacer.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,909
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The standard gauge GTW's I've been on have certainly not felt like a tram or a Pacer.

The only standard gauge GTWs I've been on are the Thurbo sets, and they have 3+2 seating and definitely do feel like a fancy tram/Pacer. I've also been on the narrow gauge ones on the Vevey-Blonay service, and they definitely do feel like an oversized tram.
 

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
5,247
So with 003 entering service, my records have it as only 009 and 011 are yet to carry passengers?
 

Chris217

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2018
Messages
646
I managed a ride out on a class 231 on my recent Cardiff visit.
In all fairness,I quite like them.
Fast and quiet even next to the thrash cupboard lol.
The one I had was 231007 although there was another in service and 2 on driver training.
I also managed some 769s before their imminent demise. Which seemed very poor by comparison.
Although I'd still prefer the 769s over the horrid 150s.
At times like this I realised how much I miss the 142s and 143s.
 

Top