• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

train carrying aircraft derails in Montana, USA

Status
Not open for further replies.

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,775
A train carrying Boeing 737 fueslages has derailed, with the planes ending up in a river

SUPERIOR, MONTANA -- The investigation continues into the derailment of a train near the town of Superior, Montana Thursday night.

Some of the cars carried aircraft components.

Nineteen cars on the westbound train derailed. Three of the cars contained aircraft parts and ended up in the Clark Fork River. Sources tell KING5 the parts were heading to Boeing in Renton.

Crews spent the night and into this morning cleaning up.

No one was hurt and the cause is under investigation.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
The Americans do seem to have a thing about rivers and aircraft dont they! :lol:
 
Last edited:

Strathclyder

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
3,856
Location
Clydebank
Ouch! That's gonna be expensive!
Just out of curiosity, who was it that was hauling them? Union Pacific?
 
Last edited:

DownSouth

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2011
Messages
1,545
That route is Montana Rail Link (reporting mark MRL) which both operates their own trains and sells track access to BNSF to link between two parts of BNSF's own network.
 

DownSouth

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2011
Messages
1,545
Confirmed it was a MRL train, not a BNSF train operating on MRL tracks.
Oops. That is going to be expensive for someone.
Or for someone's insurer. This is why businesses pay premiums!
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
Confirmed it was a MRL train, not a BNSF train operating on MRL tracks.

Or for someone's insurer. This is why businesses pay premiums!

Yeah mate, I worked for 10 years in insurance. It is still going to cost someone a lot of money. My best mate is an actuary, he can probably tell you who.
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
Oops. That is going to be expensive for someone.

At least one has creasing at the Crown, it is repairable but very expensive job (I believe it cost about £20million for Thomson's Bent 767 at Bristol) so that'll probably be scrapped and another built in it's place. They are just empty shells so depending on damage the others may be repairable. Either way it's going to hold production up for a few days (typically a complete 737 comes off the line at Renton every day)

For those that don't know - 737 fuselage shells are built in Kansas and are then shipped by rail to Renton (near Seattle) for completion.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,775
Boeing are aiming to up the construction of 737s to "rate 40" or more- that's 40 planes per month, average.
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
I prefer Easyjet and Airbus to Ryanair anyway so I can't see it having any impact on me in the short term. Ha ha.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Inquiry has concluded with a failure to find a direct cause for the accident but ruling out staff or trailer load as cause. Its being put down as a 'track geometry' issue possibly caused by traffic weight, i.e. repeated heavy loads had caused the rails to shift.

The accident caused 6 737 Fuselages to be written off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top