• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

"Too much information?"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,183
Location
Bolton
"Service calls Mauldeth Burnage Didsbury Gatley Heald Green Airport Styal Wimslow Alderley Homes Chapel Sandbach terminates Crewe."

They are WRONG! That's what's up with it! Sorry, my bad for not making that clear :oops:

Crewe 16:46

Via Manchester Airport
Calling at:
Mauldeth Road
Burnage
East Didsbury
Gatley
Heald Green
Manchester Airport
Styal
Wilmslow
Alderley Edge
Holmes Chapel
Sandbach
& Crewe

Northern
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
They are WRONG! That's what's up with it! Sorry, my bad for not making that clear :oops:

Crewe 16:46

Via Manchester Airport
Calling at:
Mauldeth Road
Burnage
East Didsbury
Gatley
Heald Green
Manchester Airport
Styal
Wilmslow
Alderley Edge
Holmes Chapel
Sandbach
& Crewe

Northern

How are they wrong? The list in your first post is the same stations as the list above?
 

Jona26

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2013
Messages
273
Location
West Sussex
Just be thankful you don't have to travel on the new Arriva buses from Wrexham to Chester. All stops announced as "arriving at xxx next stop yyy" and on departure ""next stop zzz". All in English and Welsh. As the stops are so close together it's practically non-stop announcements for 45 minutes!
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,183
Location
Bolton
How are they wrong? The list in your first post is the same stations as the list above?

He reads them out wrong though. It wasn't a sic quote because I couldn't remember it. It's "Mauldeth Road" not "Mauldeth" and "Alderley Edge" not just "Alderley" ! Where else do you get that? It also omits the time, the Via point, the TOC...
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
FGW guards seem to have cut back on the level of announcements in the last month or so. Unfortunately the customer hosts tend to take up the slack.

Both have different scripts, CH's keep getting told to sell the cafe.
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
He reads them out wrong though. It wasn't a sic quote because I couldn't remember it. It's "Mauldeth Road" not "Mauldeth" and "Alderley Edge" not just "Alderley" ! Where else do you get that? It also omits the time, the Via point, the TOC...

So? whats wrong with that? I often abbreviate stations in announcements-all stations to Welwyn (not GC), all stations via Hertford (not north), next station will be southgate followed by oakleigh park and Barnet.

Not a big deal. I never include the train operator in announcements, I usually state the departure time but its not a big deal-if the train goes where people want it to then the departure time doesn't matter-everyone can look at a clock/watch! I rarely announce the departure time at moorgate for example-I often just say 'this train calls at all stations to Welwyn' before departing. Can't see an issue with it-the exact stops are on the platform screens and on board maps!

I think you are looking too far into this!
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,183
Location
Bolton
So? whats wrong with that? I often abbreviate stations in announcements-all stations to Welwyn (not GC), all stations via Hertford (not north), next station will be southgate followed by oakleigh park and Barnet.

Not a big deal. I never include the train operator in announcements, I usually state the departure time but its not a big deal-if the train goes where people want it to then the departure time doesn't matter-everyone can look at a clock/watch! I rarely announce the departure time at moorgate for example-I often just say 'this train calls at all stations to Welwyn' before departing. Can't see an issue with it-the exact stops are on the platform screens and on board maps!

I think you are looking too far into this!

I suppose you think its OK to just put 'Victoria' or 'Waterloo' on the departure board then too? I mean fair enough if you do, you've got a point, but...
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
I suppose you think its OK to just put 'Victoria' or 'Waterloo' on the departure board then too? I mean fair enough if you do, you've got a point, but...

What's wrong with just Victoria or Waterloo?

When I drove on southern I often said 'this train is for Victoria'. No point saying London Victoria is there? I doubt anyone getting on a train at dorking, Croydon, Brighton, oxted etc is honestly going to get confused and wonder if they at going to London, Southend or Manchester...

Now I never say 'London kings x/London moorgate', no point, everyone knows the train is for the kings x or moorgate in London.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,183
Location
Bolton
What's wrong with just Victoria or Waterloo?

When I drove on southern I often said 'this train is for Victoria'. No point saying London Victoria is there? I doubt anyone getting on a train at dorking, Croydon, Brighton, oxted etc is honestly going to get confused and wonder if they at going to London, Southend or Manchester...

Now I never say 'London kings x/London moorgate', no point, everyone knows the train is for the kings x or moorgate in London.


Well it is 'wrong' even if it does 'help' passengers in the short term. Especially in the case of London Waterloo - it absolutely must be called that in a national application. Perhaps I take objection to the practice because if it were widely used it would lead to the Victoria being the London one... the others would still have to be referred to as "Manchester Victoria" ect. Perhaps that can't be helped anyway.

But, there's no point arguing, so we shall agree to disagree :D
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
Well it is 'wrong' even if it does 'help' passengers in the short term. Especially in the case of London Waterloo - it absolutely must be called that in a national application. Perhaps I take objection to the practice because if it were widely used it would lead to the Victoria being the London one... the others would still have to be referred to as "Manchester Victoria" ect. Perhaps that can't be helped anyway.

But, there's no point arguing, so we shall agree to disagree :D

Ok, you may be reading too much into this! I don't think many other people bat an eyelid about abbreviating stations or leaving out the city especially local or commuter journies! Even intercity tocs often say just kings x or euston.

If you catch a train from Leeds to Victoria there is little doubt which city you will end up in. Same if you catch a Victoria train from Kent or Surrey and if you catch a train to Waterloo from Woking you wouldn't imagine from a second that you would end up in Liverpool, same that a train going via Waterloo from southport certainly won't be running through London!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top