• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Ticket costing less than its face value.

Status
Not open for further replies.

amn140174

Member
Joined
12 Sep 2009
Messages
31
I have just bought two single tickets from Durham to Manchester through the Transpenninexpress/sale.co.uk web site, nothing strange there I guess.....

But on the screen the price was £18.80 for two people with a disabled railcard discount, so guessing it was £9.40 each.

Now my card has been billed correctly for £18.80 but each ticket has a fare of £11.55 printed on them totaling £23.10.

Might just be me being strange but I find this odd.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Lampshade

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2009
Messages
3,777
Location
South London
I get this whenever I use the student discount, it's because the ticket itself would cost that normally, they are just applying the discount to the transaction as opposed to changing the price of the tickets.
 

googolplex

Member
Joined
28 Mar 2009
Messages
220
Southern do it how you would expect - when I bought the 90% off advance tickets for Earth Day (or whatever it was) they were printed with the price of £0.75 with a discount field on the ticket showing "90%".
Would this not be a something TPE could use to avoid confusion (people thinking they've been overcharged etc)?
 

Max

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
5,468
Location
Cambridge
Similarly when Scotrail offered 50% off to their 'advance' members, the full price was printed on the ticket but the receipt showed the price with the discount.
 

Dolive22

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2009
Messages
464
I thought that was illegal. I am pretty certain that one of the old acts still requires tickets to show their price on them. Doesn't make any difference, just strange.
 

John @ home

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2008
Messages
5,148
I thought that was illegal. I am pretty certain that one of the old acts still requires tickets to show their price on them. Doesn't make any difference, just strange.
It seems that the provision in Section 6 of the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 was repealed by the 1993 Act.
Regulation of Railways Act 1889 said:
Passenger ticket to have fare printed thereon.
6.From and after a date to be fixed by order of the Board of Trade, and subject to such exceptions, if any, as may be allowed by such order, every passenger ticket issued by any railway company in the United Kingdom shall bear upon its face, printed or written in legible characters, the fare chargeable for the journey for which such ticket is issued, and any railway company issuing any passenger ticket in contravention of the provisions of this section shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding [level 1 on the standard scale] for every ticket so issued, to be recovered on summary conviction.

Amendments
S. 6 repealed (E.W.S.) (1.4.1994) by 1993 c. 43, ss. 150(1)(o), 152(1)(3), Sch. 12 para. 1, Sch.14; S.I. 1994/571, art. 5

http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/conten...061371&ActiveTextDocId=1061371&filesize=45573
 

Dolive22

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2009
Messages
464
That'll teach me to pay more attention to the notes.

I thought I was the only SLD fan on here. Are you a pro or just a well equipped amateur?
 

metrocammel

Verified Rep - Retro Railtours
Joined
11 Aug 2005
Messages
954
If you were delayed, and applied for a refund, I wonder if they would calculate the refund from the face value, or the transaction value?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top