Butts
Veteran Member
So they're only refusing elective surgery. Frankly nobody should be smoking these days. With obesity I have a great deal more sympathy as the issue isn't always "you sit around all day and eat too much".
Says who ? , are you in favour of paying higher taxes to make up the revenue shortfall. The taxation raised from tobacco products more than eclipses the amount it costs the NHS to treat those affected by smoking related diseases. We are talking billions more - not chicken feed
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
This is rubbish. You can eat healthy very cheaply. People just don't want to invest the time to do so as a microwave meal or take out is easier
Agreed - the lard arses are to idle , anyone who watches Benefits Britain or the ilk is aware of this
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Same with smokers - I'd rather that finite resources were targeted at those at least trying to quit - or operations become little more than a sticking plaster (no pun intended...).
Benson and Hedges should be available on prescription - I'd get them free up here
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
The NHS is overburdened with Fat. Fat Cats who pay themselves what they like and if they oversee a foul up, as we have seen this week, they just step down and then some "mates" (also fat cats) create a job for them at a similar salary and nobody does anything to stop this gravy train. These people then blame the media for the problem, not themselves. The lady in question should have been SACKED as she probably would have been if she'd been a nurse.
Well I suppose it depends on what your definition of a "Fat Cat" is - someone on £150,000 a year or a Premiership Footballer on £1.5 Million per year for an average player.
The bottom line is with the advances in medicine and increases in life expectancy costs continue to escalate. So a decision has to be made about how much to spend and on what. Unfortunately like most other aspects of Social Policy everyone expects someone else to pay for it - ie anyone earning more than them.
Fraternal postulations with regard to the poor and ill don't extend to the ballot box when an individuals wallet is to be the source of funding a fairer and healthier society.
Last edited:
